• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为卫生政策翻译研究:研究人员对社交媒体的认知与使用

Translating research for health policy: researchers' perceptions and use of social media.

作者信息

Grande David, Gollust Sarah E, Pany Maximilian, Seymour Jane, Goss Adeline, Kilaru Austin, Meisel Zachary

机构信息

David Grande (

Sarah E. Gollust is an assistant professor in the Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, in Minneapolis.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jul;33(7):1278-85. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0300. Epub 2014 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0300
PMID:24907363
Abstract

As the United States moves forward with health reform, the communication gap between researchers and policy makers will need to be narrowed to promote policies informed by evidence. Social media represent an expanding channel for communication. Academic journals, public health agencies, and health care organizations are increasingly using social media to communicate health information. For example, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention now regularly tweets to 290,000 followers. We conducted a survey of health policy researchers about using social media and two traditional channels (traditional media and direct outreach) to disseminate research findings to policy makers. Researchers rated the efficacy of the three dissemination methods similarly but rated social media lower than the other two in three domains: researchers' confidence in their ability to use the method, peers' respect for its use, and how it is perceived in academic promotion. Just 14 percent of our participants reported tweeting, and 21 percent reported blogging about their research or related health policy in the past year. Researchers described social media as being incompatible with research, of high risk professionally, of uncertain efficacy, and an unfamiliar technology that they did not know how to use. Researchers will need evidence-based strategies, training, and institutional resources to use social media to communicate evidence.

摘要

随着美国推进医疗改革,研究人员与政策制定者之间的沟通差距需要缩小,以促进基于证据的政策制定。社交媒体是一个不断扩展的沟通渠道。学术期刊、公共卫生机构和医疗保健组织越来越多地利用社交媒体来传播健康信息。例如,疾病控制与预防中心现在定期向29万名关注者发布推文。我们对健康政策研究人员进行了一项调查,了解他们使用社交媒体以及两种传统渠道(传统媒体和直接宣传)向政策制定者传播研究结果的情况。研究人员对这三种传播方法的效果评价相似,但在三个方面对社交媒体的评价低于其他两种方法:研究人员对自己使用该方法能力的信心、同行对其使用的尊重程度以及在学术晋升中对它的看法。在我们的参与者中,只有14%的人报告在过去一年里发过推文,21%的人报告写过关于他们研究或相关健康政策的博客。研究人员将社交媒体描述为与研究不兼容、职业风险高、效果不确定以及是一种他们不知道如何使用的陌生技术。研究人员需要基于证据的策略、培训和机构资源来利用社交媒体传播证据。

相似文献

1
Translating research for health policy: researchers' perceptions and use of social media.为卫生政策翻译研究:研究人员对社交媒体的认知与使用
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jul;33(7):1278-85. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0300. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
2
The acceptability among health researchers and clinicians of social media to translate research evidence to clinical practice: mixed-methods survey and interview study.健康研究人员和临床医生对社交媒体将研究证据转化为临床实践的可接受性:混合方法调查与访谈研究
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 20;17(5):e119. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4347.
3
Social media, evidence-based tweeting, and JCEHP.社交媒体、基于证据的推文与《联合委员会健康专业教育杂志》
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2014 Fall;34(4):202-4. doi: 10.1002/chp.21250.
4
How is the use of research evidence in health policy perceived? A comparison between the reporting of researchers and policy-makers.研究证据在卫生政策中的应用是如何被感知的?研究人员和政策制定者报告的比较。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 20;16(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0345-6.
5
Twitter accounts followed by Congressional health staff.国会卫生工作人员关注的推特账户。
Am J Manag Care. 2017 Jul 1;23(7):e238-e244.
6
From "our world" to the "real world": Exploring the views and behaviour of policy-influential Australian public health researchers.从“我们的世界”到“现实世界”:探索有政策影响力的澳大利亚公共卫生研究人员的观点和行为。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Apr;72(7):1047-55. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.004. Epub 2011 Feb 26.
7
Examining the use of health systems and policy research in the health policymaking process in Israel: views of researchers.审视以色列卫生政策制定过程中卫生系统与政策研究的应用:研究人员的观点
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Sep 1;14(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0139-7.
8
Translating Research for Health Policy Decisions: Is It Time for Researchers to Join Social Media?为卫生政策决策翻译研究成果:研究人员是时候加入社交媒体了吗?
Acad Med. 2016 Oct;91(10):1341-1343. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001182.
9
Dissemination of evidence in paediatric emergency medicine: a quantitative descriptive evaluation of a 16-week social media promotion.儿科急诊医学中证据的传播:一项为期16周的社交媒体推广的定量描述性评估
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 6;8(6):e022298. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022298.
10
Reaching "an audience that you would never dream of speaking to": influential public health researchers' views on the role of news media in influencing policy and public understanding.触及“你做梦也想不到的受众”:有影响力的公共卫生研究人员对新闻媒体在影响政策和公众理解方面作用的看法。
J Health Commun. 2014;19(2):260-73. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2013.811327. Epub 2013 Oct 24.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of research on health education/health literacy on policymaking in Latin America and the Caribbean Region.研究对拉丁美洲和加勒比地区健康教育/健康素养政策制定的影响。
AIMS Public Health. 2024 Mar 18;11(2):330-348. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024017. eCollection 2024.
2
Training Health Policy Researchers on Policy Engagement and Research Translation for Greater Impact: Evaluation of the Amplify@LDI Program.培训卫生政策研究人员参与政策制定和研究转化以实现更大影响:Amplify@LDI 项目评估。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Oct;38(13):3073-3076. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08341-x. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
3
Beyond Journals-Visual Abstracts Promote Wider Suicide Prevention Research Dissemination and Engagement: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
超越期刊——可视化摘要促进更广泛的自杀预防研究传播与参与:一项随机交叉试验。
Front Res Metr Anal. 2020 Oct 14;5:564193. doi: 10.3389/frma.2020.564193. eCollection 2020.
4
Translational Medicine in the Era of Social Media: A Survey of Scientific and Clinical Communities.社交媒体时代的转化医学:对科学与临床领域的一项调查
Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Jul 3;6:152. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00152. eCollection 2019.
5
Possibilities and Pitfalls of Social Media for Translational Medicine.社交媒体在转化医学中的机遇与陷阱
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Dec 6;5:345. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00345. eCollection 2018.
6
The unbearable emptiness of tweeting-About journal articles.发推讲述期刊文章的难耐空虚
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 24;12(8):e0183551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183551. eCollection 2017.
7
Mutual Distrust: Perspectives From Researchers and Policy Makers on the Research to Policy Gap in 2013 and Recommendations for the Future.相互不信任:研究人员和政策制定者对2013年研究与政策差距的看法及未来建议
Inquiry. 2017 Jan 1;54:46958017705465. doi: 10.1177/0046958017705465.
8
Online Dissemination Strategies of a Canada Research Chair: Overview and Lessons Learned.加拿大研究主席的在线传播策略:概述与经验教训
JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Feb 24;6(2):e27. doi: 10.2196/resprot.6413.
9
The Impact of Social Media on Dissemination and Implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Longitudinal Observational Study.社交媒体对临床实践指南传播与实施的影响:一项纵向观察研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Aug 13;17(8):e193. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4414.