Grande David, Gollust Sarah E, Pany Maximilian, Seymour Jane, Goss Adeline, Kilaru Austin, Meisel Zachary
David Grande (
Sarah E. Gollust is an assistant professor in the Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, in Minneapolis.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jul;33(7):1278-85. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0300. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
As the United States moves forward with health reform, the communication gap between researchers and policy makers will need to be narrowed to promote policies informed by evidence. Social media represent an expanding channel for communication. Academic journals, public health agencies, and health care organizations are increasingly using social media to communicate health information. For example, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention now regularly tweets to 290,000 followers. We conducted a survey of health policy researchers about using social media and two traditional channels (traditional media and direct outreach) to disseminate research findings to policy makers. Researchers rated the efficacy of the three dissemination methods similarly but rated social media lower than the other two in three domains: researchers' confidence in their ability to use the method, peers' respect for its use, and how it is perceived in academic promotion. Just 14 percent of our participants reported tweeting, and 21 percent reported blogging about their research or related health policy in the past year. Researchers described social media as being incompatible with research, of high risk professionally, of uncertain efficacy, and an unfamiliar technology that they did not know how to use. Researchers will need evidence-based strategies, training, and institutional resources to use social media to communicate evidence.
随着美国推进医疗改革,研究人员与政策制定者之间的沟通差距需要缩小,以促进基于证据的政策制定。社交媒体是一个不断扩展的沟通渠道。学术期刊、公共卫生机构和医疗保健组织越来越多地利用社交媒体来传播健康信息。例如,疾病控制与预防中心现在定期向29万名关注者发布推文。我们对健康政策研究人员进行了一项调查,了解他们使用社交媒体以及两种传统渠道(传统媒体和直接宣传)向政策制定者传播研究结果的情况。研究人员对这三种传播方法的效果评价相似,但在三个方面对社交媒体的评价低于其他两种方法:研究人员对自己使用该方法能力的信心、同行对其使用的尊重程度以及在学术晋升中对它的看法。在我们的参与者中,只有14%的人报告在过去一年里发过推文,21%的人报告写过关于他们研究或相关健康政策的博客。研究人员将社交媒体描述为与研究不兼容、职业风险高、效果不确定以及是一种他们不知道如何使用的陌生技术。研究人员需要基于证据的策略、培训和机构资源来利用社交媒体传播证据。