Gonzalez-Heydrich Joseph, Hsin Olivia, Gumlak Sarah, Kimball Kara, Rober Ashley, Azeem Muhammad W, Hickory Meredith, Mrakotsky Christine, Torres Alcy, Mezzacappa Enrico, Bourgeois Blaise, Biederman Joseph
Department of Psychiatry, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Epilepsy Behav. 2014 Jul;36:102-7. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.04.026. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
To retrospectively examine response to stimulant treatment in patients with epilepsy and ADHD symptoms as predicted by seizure freedom for six months, use of methylphenidate (MPH) versus amphetamine (AMP) preparations, cognitive level, and medical records were searched for patients under the age of 18 with epilepsy and ADHD symptoms treated with MPH or AMP (n=36, age=10.4 ± 3.5; male=67%). "Responders" had a CGI-improvement score of ≤ 2 and did not stop medication because of adverse effects. "Worsened" patients discontinued medication because of agitation/emotional lability. Seizure freedom did not predict treatment response. Lower cognitive level was associated with increased rate of worsening (p=0.048). No patients who were seizure-free at the start of the medication trial experienced an increase in seizures. Of the patients having seizures at the start of trial, one patient on MPH and two patients on AMP had increased seizures during the trial. Seizures returned to baseline frequency or less after stimulant discontinuation or anticonvulsant adjustment. Methylphenidate was associated with a higher response rate, with 12 of 19 given MPH (0.62 ± 0.28 mg/kg/day) compared with 4 of 17 given AMP (0.37 ± 0.26 mg/kg/day) responding (p=0.03). Methylphenidate treatment and higher cognitive level were associated with improved treatment outcome, while seizure freedom had no clear effect. Confidence in these findings is limited by the study's small, open-label, and uncontrolled design.
为了回顾性研究癫痫合并注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)症状患者对兴奋剂治疗的反应,以六个月无癫痫发作作为预测指标,检索了18岁以下使用哌甲酯(MPH)或苯丙胺(AMP)治疗癫痫合并ADHD症状患者的病历(n = 36,年龄 = 10.4±3.5;男性占67%)。“反应者”的临床总体印象改善量表(CGI)得分≤2,且未因不良反应停药。“病情恶化”的患者因激越/情绪不稳定而停药。无癫痫发作并不能预测治疗反应。较低的认知水平与病情恶化率增加相关(p = 0.048)。在药物试验开始时无癫痫发作的患者中,没有患者癫痫发作增加。在试验开始时有癫痫发作的患者中,1例使用MPH的患者和2例使用AMP的患者在试验期间癫痫发作增加。在停用兴奋剂或调整抗惊厥药物后,癫痫发作频率恢复到基线水平或更低。哌甲酯的反应率更高,19例使用MPH(0.62±0.28mg/kg/天)的患者中有12例有反应,而17例使用AMP(0.37±0.26mg/kg/天)的患者中有4例有反应(p = 0.03)。哌甲酯治疗和较高的认知水平与较好的治疗结果相关,而无癫痫发作没有明显影响。本研究的小样本、开放标签和非对照设计限制了这些发现的可信度。