• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传统一线降压治疗的替代方案:未解决的问题与治疗困境。个人观点。

Alternatives to traditional first-line antihypertensive treatment: unresolved questions and therapeutic dilemmas. A personal approach.

作者信息

Zusman R M

机构信息

Hypertension Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114.

出版信息

Hypertension. 1989 May;13(5 Suppl):I154-7. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.13.5_suppl.i154.

DOI:10.1161/01.hyp.13.5_suppl.i154
PMID:2490819
Abstract

The best antihypertensive regimen for use in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension has not been determined. When nonpharmacological treatment of hypertension fails, initial drug treatment with diuretic drugs, sympatholytic agents (including beta-adrenergic receptor blockers), or vasodilators will result in satisfactory blood pressure control. However, each of these therapies has effects that are independent of their antihypertensive activity and that should be considered before a selection is made for initial therapy. The adverse effects of diuretic agents and beta-adrenergic receptor-blocking drugs on plasma lipid profiles may diminish the beneficial effects of blood pressure reduction. On the other hand, the hypocholesterolemic effect of alpha-adrenergic receptor antagonists, the potential cardioprotective effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, and the salutary effects of calcium channel blockers on left ventricular function are responses that would support the use of vasodilatory therapy. Vasodilating antihypertensive drugs may be more beneficial than "standard" therapy and should be considered for the initial treatment of newly diagnosed hypertensive patients.

摘要

轻度至中度高血压患者的最佳抗高血压治疗方案尚未确定。当高血压的非药物治疗失败时,使用利尿剂、抗交感神经药(包括β-肾上腺素能受体阻滞剂)或血管扩张剂进行初始药物治疗将使血压得到满意控制。然而,这些治疗方法中的每一种都有独立于其抗高血压活性的作用,在选择初始治疗方法之前应予以考虑。利尿剂和β-肾上腺素能受体阻断药对血浆脂质谱的不良影响可能会削弱血压降低的有益作用。另一方面,α-肾上腺素能受体拮抗剂的降胆固醇作用、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的潜在心脏保护作用以及钙通道阻滞剂对左心室功能的有益作用,这些反应都支持使用血管舒张疗法。血管舒张性抗高血压药物可能比“标准”疗法更有益,对于新诊断的高血压患者的初始治疗应予以考虑。

相似文献

1
Alternatives to traditional first-line antihypertensive treatment: unresolved questions and therapeutic dilemmas. A personal approach.传统一线降压治疗的替代方案:未解决的问题与治疗困境。个人观点。
Hypertension. 1989 May;13(5 Suppl):I154-7. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.13.5_suppl.i154.
2
Traditional first-line therapy. Overview of medical benefits and side effects.传统一线治疗。医学益处及副作用概述。
Hypertension. 1989 May;13(5 Suppl):I119-24. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.13.5_suppl.i119.
3
Goals of antihypertensive therapy.抗高血压治疗的目标。
Drugs. 1995 Feb;49(2):161-75. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199549020-00002.
4
Cochrane in context: pharmacological interventions for hypertension in children.Cochrane背景下:儿童高血压的药物干预
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Sep;9(3):581-3. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1975.
5
Pharmacological interventions for hypertension in children.儿童高血压的药物干预措施。
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Sep;9(3):498-580. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1974.
6
The role of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in elderly patients with hypertension.血管紧张素II 1型受体拮抗剂在老年高血压患者中的作用。
Drugs Aging. 2006;23(2):131-55. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200623020-00004.
7
[Are all antihypertensive drugs renoprotective?].[所有抗高血压药物都具有肾脏保护作用吗?]
Herz. 2004 May;29(3):248-54. doi: 10.1007/s00059-003-2508-6.
8
Association between cardiovascular outcomes and antihypertensive drug treatment in older women.老年女性心血管结局与降压药物治疗之间的关联
JAMA. 2004 Dec 15;292(23):2849-59. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.23.2849.
9
Are there benefits to specific antihypertensive drug therapy?特定的抗高血压药物治疗有什么益处吗?
Am J Hypertens. 2003 Nov;16(11 Pt 2):31S-35S. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2003.07.004.
10
Renal protection in hypertensive patients: selection of antihypertensive therapy.高血压患者的肾脏保护:抗高血压治疗的选择
Drugs. 2005;65 Suppl 2:29-39. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565002-00005.