Park Young Eun, Shon Min Soo, Lim Tae Kang, Koh Kyoung Hwan, Jung Sung-Weon, Yoo Jae Chul
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Arthroscopy. 2014 Sep;30(9):1055-60. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.04.091. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
The purpose of this study was to compare morphologic features of the acromion after 2 different repair methods (single-row [SR] repair with a minimum of 4 knots and suture-bridge [SB] repair with minimal knots) in medium to large rotator cuff tears.
From May 2005 to July 2012, 1,693 rotator cuff repairs were performed, among them medium to large tears requiring more than 2 anchors for repair; those who had 6-month postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were included (221 shoulders). They were divided into 2 groups; group A (SR repair) and group B (SB repair). Acromial morphologic characteristics were evaluated using MRI 6 months postoperatively. An acromial defect was defined as an irregular defect or erosion on the flat acromion. Clinical measurements were performed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, and range of motion (ROM).
Erosion in the acromion was observed in 2 of 118 patients (1.7%) in group A and in 1 of 103 (1%) patients in group B. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .796). A statistically significant improvement was observed in the clinical scores measured (P = .0043). ROM was not fully recovered to the preoperative level at 6 months postoperatively. Acromioplasty was performed in 2 of 3 patients with acromial erosion. There was acromial erosion in one patient in group A without performing subacromial decompression.
Our study showed that there was no difference in acromial erosion in high-profile knots made by an SR compared with double-row (DR) SB low-profile repairs.
Level III, retrospective comparative study.
本研究旨在比较两种不同修复方法(单排[SR]修复,最少4个结;缝线桥[SB]修复,最少结)修复中到大型肩袖撕裂后肩峰的形态学特征。
2005年5月至2012年7月,共进行了1693例肩袖修复手术,其中中到大型撕裂需要超过2个锚钉进行修复;对术后6个月进行磁共振成像(MRI)扫描的患者(221例肩部)进行研究。将他们分为两组:A组(SR修复)和B组(SB修复)。术后6个月使用MRI评估肩峰形态学特征。肩峰缺损定义为平坦肩峰上的不规则缺损或侵蚀。使用美国肩肘外科医师(ASES)评分、Constant评分、视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分和活动范围(ROM)进行临床测量。
A组118例患者中有2例(1.7%)观察到肩峰侵蚀,B组103例患者中有1例(1%)观察到肩峰侵蚀。两组之间无统计学显著差异(P = 0.796)。观察到测量的临床评分有统计学显著改善(P = 0. .0043)。术后6个月ROM未完全恢复到术前水平。3例肩峰侵蚀患者中有2例进行了肩峰成形术。A组有一名患者出现肩峰侵蚀,未进行肩峰下减压。
我们的研究表明,与双排(DR)SB低结修复相比,SR制作的高结在肩峰侵蚀方面没有差异。
III级,回顾性比较研究。