Elbuluk Ameer M, Coxe Francesca R, Fabricant Peter D, Ramos Nicholas L, Alaia Michael J, Jones Kristofer J
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 May 16;7(5):2325967119842881. doi: 10.1177/2325967119842881. eCollection 2019 May.
Double-row transosseous-equivalent (TOE) rotator cuff repair techniques have been widely accepted because of their superior biomechanical properties when compared with arthroscopic single-row repair. Concerns regarding repair overtensioning with medial-row knot tying have led to increased interest in knotless repair techniques; however, there is a paucity of clinical data to guide the choice of technique.
Arthroscopic TOE repair techniques using knotless medial-row fixation will demonstrate lower retear rates and greater improvements in the Constant score relative to conventional knot-tying TOE techniques.
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
A systematic review of 3 databases (PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase) was performed using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Inclusion criteria were English-language studies that examined repair integrity or Constant scores after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with TOE techniques. Two investigators independently screened results for relevant articles. Data regarding the study design, surgical technique, retear rate, and Constant shoulder score were extracted from eligible studies. A quality assessment of all articles was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria.
The systematic review identified a total of 32 studies (level of evidence, 1-4) that met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of the 32 studies, 5 reported on knotless TOE techniques, 25 reported on knot-tying TOE techniques, and 2 reported on both. In the knotless group, retear rates ranged from 6% to 36%, and Constant scores ranged from 38-65 (preoperative) to 73-83 (postoperative). In the knot-tying group, retear rates ranged from 0% to 48%, and Constant scores ranged from 42-64 (preoperative) to 55-96 (postoperative).
Despite several theoretical advantages of knotless TOE repair, both knotless and knot-tying techniques reported considerable improvement in functional outcomes after rotator cuff repair. Although tendon failure rates showed a downward trend in knotless studies, additional prospective studies are warranted to better understand the role of medial-row fixation on tendon repair integrity and postoperative clinical outcomes.
双排骨隧道等效(TOE)肩袖修复技术因其与关节镜下单排修复相比具有优越的生物力学性能而被广泛接受。对内侧排打结导致修复过紧的担忧引发了对无结修复技术的更多关注;然而,缺乏临床数据来指导技术选择。
相对于传统的打结TOE技术,使用无结内侧排固定的关节镜TOE修复技术将显示出更低的再撕裂率和Constant评分的更大改善。
系统评价;证据等级,4级。
按照PRISMA(系统Meta分析的首选报告项目)指南对3个数据库(PubMed、Cochrane和Embase)进行系统评价。纳入标准为检查使用TOE技术进行关节镜肩袖修复后修复完整性或Constant评分的英文研究。两名研究者独立筛选结果以获取相关文章。从符合条件的研究中提取有关研究设计、手术技术、再撕裂率和Constant肩关节评分的数据。使用非随机研究方法学指数(MINORS)标准对所有文章进行质量评估。
系统评价共确定了32项符合纳入和排除标准的研究(证据等级,1 - 4级)。在这32项研究中,5项报告了无结TOE技术,25项报告了打结TOE技术,2项同时报告了这两种技术。在无结组中,再撕裂率为6%至36%,Constant评分从术前的38 - 65分提高到术后的73 - 83分。在打结组中,再撕裂率为0%至48%,Constant评分从术前的42 - 64分提高到术后的55 - 96分。
尽管无结TOE修复有几个理论优势,但无结和打结技术在肩袖修复后的功能结果方面均有显著改善。虽然在无结研究中肌腱失败率呈下降趋势,但仍需要更多前瞻性研究以更好地了解内侧排固定对肌腱修复完整性和术后临床结果的作用。