Gardiner Alison Y, Fuller David G, Vuillermin Peter J
Occupational Therapy Department, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.
J Paediatr Child Health. 2014 Aug;50(8):626-31. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12608. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
The aim of this study was to describe paediatric feeding-tube weaning practice in Australian children's hospitals and to compare this with practice in tube weaning programmes internationally.
A literature review regarding tube weaning practices was conducted to inform questionnaire design. Six Australian children's hospitals and six international paediatric service providers completed a written questionnaire.
Four of six Australian children's hospitals surveyed reported that they have adopted informal paediatric tube weaning practices; four of six lacked clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), and five of six lacked a clearly defined case leadership. Practice varied substantially within and between these Australian feeding teams. By comparison, all six international feeding teams reported having developed formal CPGs. Five of six reported clearly defined case leadership with no more than three lead professionals overseeing cases and concordantly reported a high level of practice consistency within and between teams.
The majority of Australian children's hospitals lack a formal CPG and clearly defined case leadership to guide tube weaning practices, and accordingly, there is considerable practice variation. This is in contrast to the situation in a select group of international centres. There is a need for further research to define best practice models and for Australian CPGs.
本研究旨在描述澳大利亚儿童医院小儿喂养管撤管实践,并将其与国际上喂养管撤管项目的实践进行比较。
进行了一项关于喂养管撤管实践的文献综述,为问卷设计提供参考。六家澳大利亚儿童医院和六家国际儿科服务机构完成了一份书面问卷。
接受调查的六家澳大利亚儿童医院中有四家报告称他们采用了非正式的小儿喂养管撤管实践;六家中有四家缺乏临床实践指南(CPG),六家中有五家缺乏明确界定的病例负责人。这些澳大利亚喂养团队内部和之间的实践差异很大。相比之下,所有六家国际喂养团队均报告已制定正式的CPG。六家中有五家报告有明确界定的病例负责人,由不超过三名主要专业人员监督病例,并一致报告团队内部和之间的实践一致性较高。
大多数澳大利亚儿童医院缺乏正式的CPG和明确界定的病例负责人来指导喂养管撤管实践,因此,实践差异很大。这与一组国际中心的情况形成对比。需要进一步研究以确定最佳实践模式并制定澳大利亚的CPG。