• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在使用MitraClip系统进行经皮二尖瓣修复中,深度镇静与全身麻醉相比的安全性和有效性。

Safety and efficacy of deep sedation as compared to general anaesthesia in percutaneous mitral valve repair using the MitraClip system.

作者信息

Rassaf Tienush, Balzer Jan, Zeus Tobias, Rammos Christos, Shayganfar Sascha, Hall Silke V, Wagstaff Rabea, Kelm Malte

机构信息

Medical Faculty, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Oct 1;84(4):E38-42. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25570. Epub 2014 Jul 4.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.25570
PMID:24909413
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the safety and efficacy of deep sedation (DS) as compared to general anaesthesia (GA) in percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) using the MitraClip system.

BACKGROUND

PMVR with the MitraClip system has emerged as a therapeutic alternative to surgical valve repair in high-risk patients. The PMVR procedure is typically performed under GA. Due to their high surgical risk, avoidance of GA in many of those patients would be desirable.

METHODS

In an open-label observational study 21 patients with severe mitral regurgitation were randomized to either GA or DS using propofol. Primary endpoints of this comparison were related to safety with rate of conversion from DS to GA, bleeding, aspiration, and pneumonia. Secondary endpoints were related to efficacy with procedural, in-hospital, and mid-term outcome at 1 month.

RESULTS

All clips have been implanted successfully in both groups. No conversion from DS to GA was necessary. Four patients undergoing GA suffered from upper respiratory tract infections and two from peripheral vascular complications during placement of central venous catheter for GA. Short- and mid-term efficacy were comparable in both groups with a reduced hospital stay in the DS group.

CONCLUSION

PVMR in high-risk patients performed under DS is as safe and effective as with GA, preventing complications related to GA and shortening hospital stay.

摘要

目的

比较在使用MitraClip系统进行经皮二尖瓣修复术(PMVR)时,深度镇静(DS)与全身麻醉(GA)的安全性和有效性。

背景

对于高危患者,使用MitraClip系统进行PMVR已成为手术瓣膜修复的一种治疗替代方案。PMVR手术通常在GA下进行。由于这些患者手术风险高,许多患者希望避免使用GA。

方法

在一项开放标签观察性研究中,21例严重二尖瓣反流患者被随机分为使用丙泊酚进行GA或DS的两组。该比较的主要终点与安全性相关,包括从DS转换为GA的比率、出血、误吸和肺炎。次要终点与1个月时的手术、住院和中期结局的有效性相关。

结果

两组所有夹子均成功植入。无需从DS转换为GA。4例接受GA的患者在放置GA中心静脉导管期间患上呼吸道感染,2例出现外周血管并发症。两组的短期和中期疗效相当,DS组住院时间缩短。

结论

高危患者在DS下进行的PVMR与GA一样安全有效,可预防与GA相关的并发症并缩短住院时间。

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy of deep sedation as compared to general anaesthesia in percutaneous mitral valve repair using the MitraClip system.在使用MitraClip系统进行经皮二尖瓣修复中,深度镇静与全身麻醉相比的安全性和有效性。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Oct 1;84(4):E38-42. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25570. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
2
Deep sedation versus general anesthesia in percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve reconstruction using the MitraClip system.经皮缘对缘二尖瓣修复术应用 MitraClip 系统时的深度镇静与全身麻醉比较。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 Jun;105(6):535-43. doi: 10.1007/s00392-015-0951-z. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
3
Deep sedation Vs. general anesthesia in 232 patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valve repair using the MitraClip system.232例使用MitraClip系统行经皮二尖瓣修复术患者的深度镇静与全身麻醉对比研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec 1;90(7):1212-1219. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26884. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
4
Comparison of Deep Sedation With General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair.比较经皮二尖瓣修复术中深度镇静与全身麻醉的效果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Dec 2;6(12):e007485. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007485.
5
Percutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip system according to the predicted risk by the logistic EuroSCORE: preliminary results from the German Transcatheter Mitral Valve Interventions (TRAMI) Registry.根据逻辑欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)预测的风险,使用MitraClip系统进行经皮二尖瓣修复:来自德国经导管二尖瓣介入治疗(TRAMI)注册研究的初步结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Oct 1;84(4):591-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25493. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
6
Percutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip® system under deep sedation and local anaesthesia.经皮二尖瓣修复术采用 MitraClip® 系统,在深度镇静和局部麻醉下进行。
EuroIntervention. 2012 Sep;8(5):587-90. doi: 10.4244/EIJV8I5A90.
7
Transcatheter mitral valve repair with the MitraClip(®) can be performed without general anesthesia and without conscious sedation.使用MitraClip(®)进行经导管二尖瓣修复术可以在不进行全身麻醉和不使用清醒镇静的情况下进行。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 Apr;105(4):297-306. doi: 10.1007/s00392-015-0918-0. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
8
Percutaneous mitral repair with the MitraClip system in patients with mild-to-moderate and severe heart failure: a single-centre experience.经皮二尖瓣修复术联合 MitraClip 系统治疗轻中度和重度心力衰竭患者:单中心经验。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2014 Apr;32(2):66-73. doi: 10.1111/1755-5922.12058.
9
Initial French experience of percutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip: a multicentre national registry.法国经皮二尖瓣修复术的初步经验:多中心全国注册研究。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2013 May;106(5):287-94. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2013.03.059. Epub 2013 May 28.
10
Predictors for prolonged hospital stay after transcatheter mitral valve repair with the MitraClip.经导管二尖瓣修复术(使用MitraClip)后延长住院时间的预测因素。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Oct 1;84(4):599-605. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25460. Epub 2014 Jun 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Sedation versus general anesthesia on all-cause mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.镇静与全身麻醉对接受经皮手术患者全因死亡率的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Apr 2;24(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02505-w.
2
Valve unit instead of intensive or intermediate care unit admission following transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair is safe and reduces postprocedural complications.经导管二尖瓣缘对缘修复术后采用瓣膜单元替代重症监护病房或中级监护病房收治是安全的,并可减少术后并发症。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Jul;114(7):818-826. doi: 10.1007/s00392-024-02384-8. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
3
Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Left-Atrial Appendage Occlusion with Conscious Sedation without an Anesthesiologist on Site: Results from a Multicenter Study.
经皮左心耳封堵术在无现场麻醉师的情况下进行镇静麻醉的临床结果:一项多中心研究的结果。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Nov 20;59(11):2041. doi: 10.3390/medicina59112041.
4
Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure for stroke prevention in patients with chronic renal disease.经皮左心耳封堵术用于慢性肾病患者的卒中预防
Arch Med Sci. 2020 Feb 25;19(2):331-336. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2020.92987. eCollection 2023.
5
Early Pacemaker Implantation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Impact of PlasmaBlade™ for Prevention of Device-Associated Bleeding Complications.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后早期植入起搏器:PlasmaBlade™ 预防器械相关出血并发症的影响。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Dec 5;57(12):1331. doi: 10.3390/medicina57121331.
6
Clinical outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion in general anaesthesia or conscious sedation: data from the prospective global Amplatzer Amulet Occluder Observational Study.全麻或清醒镇静下行经皮左心耳封堵术患者的临床结局:前瞻性全球 Amplatzer Amulet 封堵器观察研究的数据。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 24;11(3):e040455. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040455.
7
Deep sedation versus general anaesthesia for transcatheter mitral valve repair: an individual patient data meta-analysis of observational studies.经导管二尖瓣修复术的深度镇静与全身麻醉:观察性研究的个体患者数据荟萃分析。
EuroIntervention. 2021 Mar 19;16(16):1359-1365. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00607.
8
Comparing sedation vs. general anaesthesia in transoesophageal echocardiography-guided percutaneous transcatheter mitral valve repair: a meta-analysis.经食管超声心动图引导下经皮二尖瓣修复术时镇静与全身麻醉的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 May 1;21(5):511-521. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa019.
9
Historical Perspective on Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair.经皮二尖瓣修复术的历史回顾
Heart Views. 2018 Oct-Dec;19(4):160-163. doi: 10.4103/HEARTVIEWS.HEARTVIEWS_27_19.
10
Feasibility and safety of using local anaesthesia with conscious sedation during complex cardiac implantable electronic device procedures.在复杂心脏植入式电子设备手术中使用局部麻醉和清醒镇静的可行性和安全性。
Sci Rep. 2018 May 8;8(1):7103. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25457-x.