Geraets Liesbeth, Bessems Jos G M, Zeilmaker Marco J, Bos Peter M J
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), PO Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), PO Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014 Oct;70(1):54-64. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.05.024. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
In toxicity testing the oral route is in general the first choice. Often, appropriate inhalation and dermal toxicity data are absent. Risk assessment for these latter routes usually has to rely on route-to-route extrapolation starting from oral toxicity data. Although it is generally recognized that the uncertainties involved are (too) large, route-to-route extrapolation is applied in many cases because of a strong need of an assessment of risks linked to a given exposure scenario. For an adequate route-to-route extrapolation the availability of at least some basic toxicokinetic data is a pre-requisite. These toxicokinetic data include all phases of kinetics, from absorption (both absorbed fraction and absorption rate for both the starting route and route of interest) via distribution and biotransformation to excretion. However, in practice only differences in absorption between the different routes are accounted for. The present paper demonstrates the necessity of route-specific absorption data by showing the impact of its absence on the uncertainty of the human health risk assessment using route-to-route extrapolation. Quantification of the absorption (by in vivo, in vitro or in silico methods), particularly for the starting route, is considered essential.
在毒性测试中,口服途径通常是首选。通常情况下,缺乏适当的吸入和皮肤毒性数据。对后两种途径的风险评估通常不得不依赖于从口服毒性数据开始的途径间外推法。尽管人们普遍认识到其中涉及的不确定性(过大),但由于强烈需要评估与特定暴露场景相关的风险,途径间外推法在许多情况下仍被应用。为了进行充分的途径间外推,至少要有一些基本的毒代动力学数据是前提条件。这些毒代动力学数据包括动力学的所有阶段,从吸收(起始途径和目标途径的吸收分数和吸收速率)到分布、生物转化再到排泄。然而,在实际操作中,只考虑了不同途径之间吸收的差异。本文通过展示缺乏特定途径吸收数据对使用途径间外推法进行人体健康风险评估的不确定性的影响,证明了特定途径吸收数据的必要性。吸收的量化(通过体内、体外或计算机模拟方法),特别是对于起始途径,被认为是至关重要的。