Suppr超能文献

迈向精神障碍的认知行为分类系统。

Toward a cognitive-behavioral classification system for mental disorders.

作者信息

Hofmann Stefan G

机构信息

Boston University.

出版信息

Behav Ther. 2014 Jul;45(4):576-87. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 14.

Abstract

As is true for its predecessors, the recently published DSM-5 uses arbitrary criteria and cutoffs to define categories of mental disorders that are of questionable validity and that provide no guidance for treatment. Recently, the NIMH introduced an alternative classification system, the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC). Both the DSM-5 and the RDoC initiative make the strong assumption that psychological problems are expressions of specific latent disease entities. In contrast, the complex causal network approach conceptualizes psychological problems as mutually interacting, often reciprocally reinforcing, elements of a complex causal network. The cognitive behavioral model offers a classification framework that is compatible with the complex causal network approach and provides a treatment-relevant alternative to the latent disease model that is the basis for the DSM-5 and the RDoC initiative.

摘要

与之前的版本一样,最近发布的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM - 5)使用任意的标准和临界值来定义精神障碍类别,这些类别有效性存疑,且对治疗没有提供任何指导。最近,美国国立精神卫生研究所(NIMH)引入了一种替代分类系统,即研究领域标准(RDoC)。DSM - 5和RDoC计划都做出了一个强烈假设,即心理问题是特定潜在疾病实体的表现。相比之下,复杂因果网络方法将心理问题概念化为复杂因果网络中相互作用、通常相互强化的元素。认知行为模型提供了一个与复杂因果网络方法兼容的分类框架,并为作为DSM - 5和RDoC计划基础的潜在疾病模型提供了一个与治疗相关的替代方案。

相似文献

1
Toward a cognitive-behavioral classification system for mental disorders.迈向精神障碍的认知行为分类系统。
Behav Ther. 2014 Jul;45(4):576-87. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
2
Research Domain Criteria: toward future psychiatric nosologies.研究领域标准:迈向未来的精神疾病分类学
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2015 Mar;17(1):89-97. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2015.17.1/bcuthbert.
7
The role of RDoC in future classification of mental disorders
.RDoC 在未来精神障碍分类中的作用
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2020 Mar;22(1):81-85. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.1/bcuthbert.
8
Research Domain Criteria as Psychiatric Nosology.作为精神疾病分类学的研究领域标准
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2017 Oct;26(4):592-601. doi: 10.1017/S096318011700010X.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Rethinking Rumination.重新思考沉思。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Sep;3(5):400-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00088.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验