Malwade Ujjwala S, Jardine Luke A
Department of Paediatrics, Mater Children's Hospital, Raymond Terrace, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4101.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 10;2014(6):CD010212. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010212.pub2.
Phototherapy is commonly used for the treatment of neonatal jaundice, and home-based phototherapy is now being used in certain centres. Home-based phototherapy offers possible advantages by avoiding prolonged hospital admissions, promoting mother-infant bonding and reducing hospitalisation costs. Potential problems include increased duration of phototherapy, increased readmission to hospital and increased risk of bilirubin encephalopathy.
To compare exclusively home-based versus exclusively hospital-based phototherapy or a combination of home- and hospital-based phototherapy for the management of non-haemolytic jaundice in term infants up to 28 days of age. We planned to include specific subgroups for duration in hospital, method of phototherapy and criteria for readiness for discharge.
We searched the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) January 2013, Issue 1, part of The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (from 1966 to 15 February 2013), CINAHL (from 1982 to 15 February 2013) and EMBASE (from 1988 to 15 February 2013). We searched for abstracts from the Pediatric Academic Societies' Annual Meetings 2000 to 2013. We searched for ongoing trials on the following websites: ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov/) and Current Controlled Trials (http://controlled-trials.com/).
Randomised and quasi-randomised studies comparing term infants who received phototherapy exclusively at home versus phototherapy exclusively in the hospital or a combination of the two for non-haemolytic jaundice.
Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.
No studies that met the predefined eligibility criteria were identified.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: No high-quality evidence is currently available to support or refute the practice of home-based phototherapy for non-haemolytic jaundice in infants at more than 37 weeks' gestation.
光疗常用于治疗新生儿黄疸,目前某些中心正在采用家庭式光疗。家庭式光疗具有避免长时间住院、促进母婴亲密接触和降低住院费用等潜在优势。潜在问题包括光疗时间延长、再次入院风险增加以及胆红素脑病风险增加。
比较单纯家庭式光疗与单纯住院式光疗或家庭与住院相结合的光疗方式,用于治疗28日龄及以下足月儿的非溶血性黄疸。我们计划纳入住院时长、光疗方法及出院准备标准等特定亚组。
我们检索了Cochrane新生儿综述组专业注册库、2013年1月第1期Cochrane系统评价数据库(CENTRAL)(Cochrane图书馆的一部分)、MEDLINE(1966年至2013年2月15日)、CINAHL(1982年至2013年2月15日)和EMBASE(1988年至2013年2月15日)。我们检索了2000年至2013年儿科学术协会年会的摘要。我们在以下网站检索了正在进行的试验:ClinicalTrials.gov(http://clinicaltrials.gov/)和Current Controlled Trials(http://controlled-trials.com/)。
随机和半随机研究,比较足月儿单纯在家接受光疗与单纯在医院接受光疗或两者结合治疗非溶血性黄疸的情况。
两位综述作者独立评估试验质量并提取数据。
未找到符合预定义纳入标准的研究。
目前尚无高质量证据支持或反驳对孕周超过37周的婴儿采用家庭式光疗治疗非溶血性黄疸的做法。