Lai Nai Ming, Ahmad Kamar Azanna, Choo Yao Mun, Kong Juin Yee, Ngim Chin Fang
School of Medicine, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 1;8(8):CD011891. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011891.pub2.
Neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia is a common problem which carries a risk of neurotoxicity. Certain infants who have hyperbilirubinaemia develop bilirubin encephalopathy and kernicterus which may lead to long-term disability. Phototherapy is currently the mainstay of treatment for neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia. Among the adjunctive measures to compliment the effects of phototherapy, fluid supplementation has been proposed to reduce serum bilirubin levels. The mechanism of action proposed includes direct dilutional effects of intravenous (IV) fluids, or enhancement of peristalsis to reduce enterohepatic circulation by oral fluid supplementation.
To assess the risks and benefits of fluid supplementation compared to standard fluid management in term and preterm newborn infants with unconjugated hyperbilirubinaemia who require phototherapy.
We used the standard search strategy of Cochrane Neonatal to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2017, Issue 5), MEDLINE via PubMed (1966 to 7 June 2017), Embase (1980 to 7 June 2017), and CINAHL (1982 to 7 June 2017). We also searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials.
We included randomised controlled trials that compared fluid supplementation against no fluid supplementation, or one form of fluid supplementation against another.
We extracted data using the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group using the Covidence platform. Two review authors independently assessed the eligibility and risk of bias of the retrieved records. We expressed our results using mean difference (MD), risk difference (RD), and risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Out of 1449 articles screened, seven studies were included. Three articles were awaiting classification, among them, two completed trials identified from the trial registry appeared to be unpublished so far.There were two major comparisons: IV fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation (six studies) and IV fluid supplementation versus oral fluid supplementation (one study). A total of 494 term, healthy newborn infants with unconjugated hyperbilirubinaemia were evaluated. All studies were at high risk of bias for blinding of care personnel, five studies had unclear risk of bias for blinding of outcome assessors, and most studies had unclear risk of bias in allocation concealment. There was low- to moderate-quality evidence for all major outcomes.In the comparison between IV fluid supplementation and no supplementation, no infant in either group developed bilirubin encephalopathy in the one study that reported this outcome. Serum bilirubin was lower at four hours postintervention for infants who received IV fluid supplementation (MD -34.00 μmol/L (-1.99 mg/dL), 95% CI -52.29 (3.06) to -15.71 (0.92); participants = 67, study = 1) (low quality of evidence, downgraded one level for indirectness and one level for suspected publication bias). Beyond eight hours postintervention, serum bilirubin was similar between the two groups. Duration of phototherapy was significantly shorter for fluid-supplemented infants, but the estimate was affected by heterogeneity which was not clearly explained (MD -10.70 hours, 95% CI -15.55 to -5.85; participants = 218; studies = 3; I² = 67%). Fluid-supplemented infants were less likely to require exchange transfusion (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.71; RD -0.01, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.02; participants = 462; studies = 6; I² = 72%) (low quality of evidence, downgraded one level due to inconsistency, and another level due to suspected publication bias), and the estimate was similarly affected by unexplained heterogeneity. The frequencies of breastfeeding were similar between the fluid-supplemented and non-supplemented infants in days one to three based on one study (estimate on day three: MD 0.90 feeds, 95% CI -0.40 to 2.20; participants = 60) (moderate quality of evidence, downgraded one level for imprecision).One study contributed to all outcome data in the comparison of IV versus oral fluid supplementation. In this comparison, no infant in either group developed abnormal neurological signs. Serum bilirubin, as well as the rate of change of serum bilirubin, were similar between the two groups at four hours after phototherapy (serum bilirubin: MD 11.00 μmol/L (0.64 mg/dL), 95% CI -21.58 (-1.26) to 43.58 (2.55); rate of change of serum bilirubin: MD 0.80 μmol/L/hour (0.05 mg/dL/hour), 95% CI -2.55 (-0.15) to 4.15 (0.24); participants = 54 in both outcomes) (moderate quality of evidence for both outcomes, downgraded one level for indirectness). The number of infants who required exchange transfusion was similar between the two groups (RR 1.60, 95% CI 0.60 to 4.27; RD 0.11, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.34; participants = 54). No infant in either group developed adverse effects including vomiting or abdominal distension.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence that IV fluid supplementation affects important clinical outcomes such as bilirubin encephalopathy, kernicterus, or cerebral palsy in healthy, term newborn infants with unconjugated hyperbilirubinaemia requiring phototherapy. In this review, no infant developed these bilirubin-associated clinical complications. Low- to moderate-quality evidence shows that there are differences in total serum bilirubin levels between fluid-supplemented and control groups at some time points but not at others, the clinical significance of which is uncertain. There is no evidence of a difference between the effectiveness of IV and oral fluid supplementations in reducing serum bilirubin. Similarly, no infant developed adverse events or complications from fluid supplementation such as vomiting or abdominal distension. This suggests a need for future research to focus on different population groups with possibly higher baseline risks of bilirubin-related neurological complications, such as preterm or low birthweight infants, infants with haemolytic hyperbilirubinaemia, as well as infants with dehydration for comparison of different fluid supplementation regimen.
新生儿高胆红素血症是一个常见问题,存在神经毒性风险。某些患有高胆红素血症的婴儿会发展为胆红素脑病和核黄疸,这可能导致长期残疾。光疗是目前新生儿高胆红素血症的主要治疗方法。在补充光疗效果的辅助措施中,已提出补充液体以降低血清胆红素水平。提出的作用机制包括静脉输液的直接稀释作用,或通过口服补液增强蠕动以减少肠肝循环。
评估在需要光疗的足月和早产未结合型高胆红素血症新生儿中,补充液体与标准液体管理相比的风险和益处。
我们使用Cochrane新生儿的标准检索策略,检索Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL;2017年第5期)、通过PubMed检索MEDLINE(1966年至2017年6月7日)、Embase(1980年至2017年6月7日)和CINAHL(1982年至2017年6月7日)。我们还检索了临床试验数据库、会议论文集以及检索文章的参考文献列表,以查找随机对照试验和半随机试验。
我们纳入了比较补充液体与不补充液体,或一种液体补充方式与另一种液体补充方式的随机对照试验。
我们使用Cochrane新生儿综述小组的标准方法,通过Covidence平台提取数据。两位综述作者独立评估检索记录的合格性和偏倚风险。我们使用平均差(MD)、风险差(RD)和风险比(RR)以及95%置信区间(CI)来表达结果。
在筛选的1449篇文章中,纳入了7项研究。3篇文章等待分类,其中,从试验注册库中识别出的2项已完成试验似乎尚未发表。有两项主要比较:静脉补液与不补液(6项研究)以及静脉补液与口服补液(1项研究)。共评估了494名足月、健康的未结合型高胆红素血症新生儿。所有研究在护理人员盲法方面存在高偏倚风险,5项研究在结局评估者盲法方面的偏倚风险不明确,大多数研究在分配隐藏方面的偏倚风险不明确。所有主要结局的证据质量为低到中等。在静脉补液与不补液的比较中,在报告该结局的一项研究中,两组均无婴儿发生胆红素脑病。接受静脉补液的婴儿在干预后4小时血清胆红素较低(MD -34.00 μmol/L(-1.99 mg/dL),95% CI -52.29(3.06)至-15.71(0.92);参与者 = 67,研究 = 1)(证据质量低,因间接性和疑似发表偏倚各降级一级)。干预8小时后,两组血清胆红素相似。补充液体的婴儿光疗持续时间明显较短,但估计值受异质性影响,而异质性未得到明确解释(MD -
10.70小时,95% CI -15.55至-5.85;参与者 = 218;研究 = 3;I² = 67%)。补充液体的婴儿需要换血的可能性较小(RR 0.39,95% CI 0.21至0.71;RD -0.01,95% CI -0.04至0.02;参与者 = 462;研究 = 6;I² = 72%)(证据质量低,因不一致性和疑似发表偏倚各降级一级),估计值同样受未解释的异质性影响。根据一项研究,补充液体和未补充液体的婴儿在第1至3天的母乳喂养频率相似(第3天的估计值:MD 0.90次喂养,95% CI -0.40至2.20;参与者 = 60)(证据质量中等,因不精确性降级一级)。一项研究提供了静脉与口服补液比较的所有结局数据。在该比较中,两组均无婴儿出现异常神经体征。光疗4小时后,两组血清胆红素以及血清胆红素变化率相似(血清胆红素:MD 11.00 μmol/L(0.64 mg/dL),95% CI -21.58(-1.26)至43.58(2.55);血清胆红素变化率:MD 0.80 μmol/L/小时(0.05 mg/dL/小时),95% CI -2.55(-0.15)至4.15(0.24);两个结局参与者均为54)(两个结局的证据质量中等,因间接性各降级一级)。两组需要换血的婴儿数量相似(RR 1.60,95% CI 0.60至4.27;RD 0.11,95% CI -0.12至0.34;参与者 = 54)。两组均无婴儿出现包括呕吐或腹胀在内的不良反应。
对于需要光疗的健康足月未结合型高胆红素血症新生儿,没有证据表明静脉补液会影响胆红素脑病、核黄疸或脑瘫等重要临床结局。在本综述中,没有婴儿发生这些与胆红素相关的临床并发症。低到中等质量的证据表明,补充液体组和对照组在某些时间点的总血清胆红素水平存在差异,但在其他时间点则无差异,其临床意义尚不确定。没有证据表明静脉补液和口服补液在降低血清胆红素方面的效果存在差异。同样,没有婴儿因补液出现不良事件或并发症,如呕吐或腹胀。这表明未来的研究需要关注胆红素相关神经并发症基线风险可能更高的不同人群组,如早产儿或低出生体重儿、溶血性高胆红素血症婴儿以及脱水婴儿,以比较不同的补液方案。