Suppr超能文献

电子健康记录是如何被使用的?利用电子健康记录数据评估医生在技术使用方面的个体差异。

How is the electronic health record being used? Use of EHR data to assess physician-level variability in technology use.

作者信息

Ancker Jessica S, Kern Lisa M, Edwards Alison, Nosal Sarah, Stein Daniel M, Hauser Diane, Kaushal Rainu

机构信息

Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Center for Healthcare Informatics and Policy, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA Health Information Technology Evaluation Collaborative (HITEC), New York, USA.

Institute for Family Health, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):1001-8. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002627. Epub 2014 Jun 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies of the effects of electronic health records (EHRs) have had mixed findings, which may be attributable to unmeasured confounders such as individual variability in use of EHR features.

OBJECTIVE

To capture physician-level variations in use of EHR features, associations with other predictors, and usage intensity over time.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of primary care providers eligible for meaningful use at a network of federally qualified health centers, using commercial EHR data from January 2010 through June 2013, a period during which the organization was preparing for and in the early stages of meaningful use.

RESULTS

Data were analyzed for 112 physicians and nurse practitioners, consisting of 430,803 encounters with 99,649 patients. EHR usage metrics were developed to capture how providers accessed and added to patient data (eg, problem list updates), used clinical decision support (eg, responses to alerts), communicated (eg, printing after-visit summaries), and used panel management options (eg, viewed panel reports). Provider-level variability was high: for example, the annual average proportion of encounters with problem lists updated ranged from 5% to 60% per provider. Some metrics were associated with provider, patient, or encounter characteristics. For example, problem list updates were more likely for new patients than established ones, and alert acceptance was negatively correlated with alert frequency.

CONCLUSIONS

Providers using the same EHR developed personalized patterns of use of EHR features. We conclude that physician-level usage of EHR features may be a valuable additional predictor in research on the effects of EHRs on healthcare quality and costs.

摘要

背景

关于电子健康记录(EHRs)影响的研究结果不一,这可能归因于未测量的混杂因素,如EHR功能使用中的个体差异。

目的

了解医生层面在EHR功能使用上的差异、与其他预测因素的关联以及随时间的使用强度。

方法

对符合在联邦合格健康中心网络中实现有意义使用条件的初级保健提供者进行回顾性队列研究,使用2010年1月至2013年6月的商业EHR数据,在此期间该组织正为有意义使用做准备并处于早期阶段。

结果

对112名医生和执业护士的数据进行了分析,包括与99,649名患者的430,803次诊疗。开发了EHR使用指标来记录提供者如何访问和添加患者数据(如问题列表更新)、使用临床决策支持(如对警报的响应)、沟通(如打印就诊后总结)以及使用面板管理选项(如查看面板报告)。提供者层面的差异很大:例如,每位提供者更新问题列表的诊疗的年平均比例在5%至60%之间。一些指标与提供者、患者或诊疗特征相关。例如,新患者比老患者更有可能更新问题列表,警报接受率与警报频率呈负相关。

结论

使用相同EHR的提供者形成了个性化的EHR功能使用模式。我们得出结论,医生层面的EHR功能使用可能是研究EHRs对医疗质量和成本影响的一个有价值的额外预测因素。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
The Elements of Style for Interruptive Electronic Health Record Alerts.中断式电子健康记录警报的风格要素
Appl Clin Inform. 2025 Mar;16(2):402-408. doi: 10.1055/a-2508-7039. Epub 2024 Dec 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Overrides of medication-related clinical decision support alerts in outpatients.门诊患者中药物相关临床决策支持警报的覆盖。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):487-91. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001813. Epub 2013 Oct 28.
10
The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records.电子健康记录的“有意义使用”规定。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 5;363(6):501-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1006114. Epub 2010 Jul 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验