Papathanasiou Athanasios
Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Hum Reprod. 2014 Sep;29(9):1835-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu135. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
The Bologna criteria for defining poor ovarian response (POR) during IVF provide a useful template for new research in this field of assisted conception. However, designing studies around the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology POR criteria can be methodologically challenging, as the new definition includes various POR subpopulations with diverse baseline characteristics and unknown clinical prognosis. When designing RCTs, potential result bias may be introduced if women from each subpopulation are not evenly allocated between intervention groups. In the case of small or moderate-size RCTs, a single-sequence randomization method may not ensure balanced allocation between groups. Stratified randomization methods provide an alternative methodological approach. Depending on the chosen methodology, patient characteristics and outcomes within each intervention group may be better reported according to relevant subpopulations.
体外受精(IVF)期间定义卵巢反应不良(POR)的博洛尼亚标准为这一辅助受孕领域的新研究提供了有用的模板。然而,围绕欧洲人类生殖与胚胎学会的POR标准设计研究在方法上可能具有挑战性,因为新定义包括具有不同基线特征和未知临床预后的各种POR亚群。在设计随机对照试验(RCT)时,如果每个亚群的女性没有在干预组之间均匀分配,可能会引入潜在的结果偏差。对于小型或中型RCT,单序列随机化方法可能无法确保组间的均衡分配。分层随机化方法提供了另一种方法学途径。根据所选方法,可以更好地按相关亚群报告每个干预组内的患者特征和结果。