Venetis Christos A
Women's & Children's Health, St George Hospital, 2nd Level - Prichard Wing, Gray Street, Kogarah P.C. 2217, NSW, Australia School of Women's & Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia
Hum Reprod. 2014 Sep;29(9):1839-41. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu138. Epub 2014 Jun 7.
The management of poor ovarian response (POR) remains one of the most significant challenges of in vitro fertilization. Numerous interventions have been proposed, yet few have been shown to be beneficial. The most important problem in evaluating the available evidence has been the lack of a standardized definition of POR. The Bologna criteria for POR have been recently introduced to provide a framework allowing future research in this field to be performed on a relatively homogenous population. However, it has been suggested that the population described by the Bologna criteria might not be sufficiently homogenous and for this reason stratified randomization should be used in relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Stratified randomization, besides its advantages, also has important shortcomings and for this reason it should be used only when there is clear evidence mandating such a design. Currently, there is insufficient data to support such practice in RCTs performed on the population described by the Bologna criteria for POR. Until such evidence becomes available, the scientific community should aim at evaluating interventions for POR according to the Bologna criteria in RCTs of sufficient sample size, with proper allocation concealment and masking.
卵巢低反应(POR)的管理仍然是体外受精面临的最重大挑战之一。人们已经提出了许多干预措施,但很少有被证明是有益的。评估现有证据时最重要的问题是缺乏POR的标准化定义。最近引入了POR的博洛尼亚标准,以提供一个框架,使该领域未来的研究能够在相对同质的人群中进行。然而,有人认为,博洛尼亚标准所描述的人群可能不够同质,因此在相关的随机对照试验(RCT)中应使用分层随机化。分层随机化除了有其优点外,也有重要的缺点,因此只有在有明确证据要求采用这种设计时才应使用。目前,在针对博洛尼亚标准所描述的POR人群进行的RCT中,没有足够的数据支持这种做法。在获得此类证据之前,科学界应致力于在样本量充足、分配隐藏适当且设盲的RCT中,根据博洛尼亚标准评估POR的干预措施。