• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

披露,还是不披露?背景很重要。

To disclose, or not to disclose? Context matters.

作者信息

Rahimzadeh Vasiliki, Avard Denise, Sénécal Karine, Knoppers Bartha Maria, Sinnett Daniel

机构信息

Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Department of Pediatrics, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Mar;23(3):279-84. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.108. Epub 2014 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1038/ejhg.2014.108
PMID:24916647
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4062531/
Abstract

Progress in understanding childhood disease using next-generation sequencing (NGS) portends vast improvements in the nature and quality of patient care. However, ethical questions surrounding the disclosure of incidental findings (IFs) persist, as NGS and other novel genomic technologies become the preferred tool for clinical genetic testing. Thus, the need for comprehensive management plans and multidisciplinary discussion on the return of IFs in pediatric research has never been more immediate. The aim of this study is to explore the views of investigators concerning the return of IFs in the pediatric oncology research context. Our findings reveal at least four contextual themes underlying the ethics of when, and how, IFs could be disclosed to participants and their families: clinical significance of the result, respect for individual, scope of professional responsibilities, and implications for the healthcare/research system. Moreover, the study proposes two action items toward anticipatory governance of IF in genetic research with children. The need to recognize the multiplicity of contextual factors in determining IF disclosure practices, particularly as NGS increasingly becomes a centerpiece in genetic research broadly, is heightened when children are involved. Sober thought should be given to the possibility of discovering IF, and to proactive discussions about disclosure considering the realities of young participants, their families, and the investigators who recruit them.

摘要

利用下一代测序(NGS)在理解儿童疾病方面取得的进展预示着患者护理的性质和质量将得到极大改善。然而,随着NGS和其他新型基因组技术成为临床基因检测的首选工具,围绕偶然发现(IFs)披露的伦理问题依然存在。因此,制定全面的管理计划并就儿科研究中IFs的反馈进行多学科讨论的需求从未如此迫切。本研究的目的是探讨研究人员对儿科肿瘤学研究背景下IFs反馈的看法。我们的研究结果揭示了至少四个与IFs何时以及如何向参与者及其家属披露的伦理相关的背景主题:结果的临床意义、对个体的尊重、专业责任范围以及对医疗保健/研究系统的影响。此外,该研究针对儿童基因研究中IFs的预期治理提出了两项行动建议。当涉及儿童时,认识到在确定IFs披露实践中背景因素的多样性的必要性就更加突出了,尤其是随着NGS越来越成为广泛的基因研究的核心。应该认真考虑发现IFs的可能性,并根据年轻参与者、他们的家庭以及招募他们的研究人员的实际情况,积极开展关于披露的讨论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9681/4326705/fa1721c20517/ejhg2014108f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9681/4326705/fa1721c20517/ejhg2014108f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9681/4326705/fa1721c20517/ejhg2014108f1.jpg

相似文献

1
To disclose, or not to disclose? Context matters.披露,还是不披露?背景很重要。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Mar;23(3):279-84. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.108. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
2
The law of incidental findings in human subjects research: establishing researchers' duties.人类受试者研究中的偶然发现法则:确立研究者的职责
J Law Med Ethics. 2008 Summer;36(2):361-83, 214. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00281.x.
3
Research participants in NGS studies want to know about incidental findings.二代测序研究中的研究参与者想要了解偶发发现。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Oct;23(10):1423-6. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.298. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
4
Disclosure of incidental findings in cancer genomic research: investigators' perceptions on obligations and barriers.癌症基因组研究中偶然发现的披露:研究者对义务和障碍的看法
Clin Genet. 2015 Oct;88(4):320-6. doi: 10.1111/cge.12540. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
5
Ethical values supporting the disclosure of incidental and secondary findings in clinical genomic testing: a qualitative study.支持在临床基因组检测中披露偶然和次要发现的伦理价值观:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Jan 30;21(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-0452-0.
6
To disclose, or not to disclose? Perspectives of clinical genomics professionals toward returning incidental findings from genomic research.是否披露?临床基因组学专业人员对从基因组研究中返还偶然发现的观点。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jul 27;22(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00670-y.
7
Genetics specialists' perspectives on disclosure of genomic incidental findings in the clinical setting.遗传学专家对临床环境中基因组偶然发现的披露的看法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Jan;90(1):133-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.09.010. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
8
Differences in Conceptual Understanding of the "Actionability" of Incidental Findings and the Resultant Difference in Ethical Responsibility: An Empirical Study in Japan.偶然发现的“可操作性”的概念理解差异以及由此产生的伦理责任差异:日本的实证研究。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2020 Jul-Sep;11(3):187-194. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1784308. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
9
'Ethical responsibility' or 'a whole can of worms': differences in opinion on incidental finding review and disclosure in neuroimaging research from focus group discussions with participants, parents, IRB members, investigators, physicians and community members.“道德责任”还是“一团麻烦事”:通过与参与者、家长、机构审查委员会成员、研究人员、医生及社区成员进行焦点小组讨论,了解在神经影像研究中对偶然发现的审查与披露方面的意见分歧
J Med Ethics. 2015 Oct;41(10):841-7. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102552. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
10
Choices of incidental findings of individuals undergoing genome wide sequencing, a single center's experience.全基因组测序个体偶然发现结果的选择:单中心经验
Clin Genet. 2017 Jan;91(1):137-140. doi: 10.1111/cge.12829. Epub 2016 Jul 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Negotiating uncertainties: care-seeking in an algorithmic society.协商不确定性:算法社会中的求医行为
Med Humanit. 2025 Aug 21;51(3):415-422. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2024-012921.
2
A systematic approach to the disclosure of genomic findings in clinical practice and research: a proposed framework with colored matrix and decision-making pathways.临床实践和研究中基因组发现披露的系统方法:提出一个带有彩色矩阵和决策路径的框架。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Dec 25;22(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00738-9.
3
Incidental and clinically actionable genetic variants in 1005 whole exomes and genomes from Qatar.

本文引用的文献

1
Anticipate and communicate: Ethical management of incidental and secondary findings in the clinical, research, and direct-to-consumer contexts (December 2013 report of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues).预见和沟通:临床、研究和直接面向消费者背景下偶然和次要发现的伦理管理(生物伦理问题总统委员会 2013 年 12 月报告)。
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Sep 15;180(6):562-4. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu217. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
2
Return of results: ethical and legal distinctions between research and clinical care.结果反馈:研究与临床医疗之间的伦理和法律区别
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2014 Mar;166C(1):105-11. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31393. Epub 2014 Mar 10.
3
1005 个来自卡塔尔的全外显子组和基因组中的偶然和具有临床可操作性的遗传变异体。
Mol Genet Genomics. 2018 Aug;293(4):919-929. doi: 10.1007/s00438-018-1431-8. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
4
Towards a Universal Molecular Microbiological Test.迈向通用分子微生物检测
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Nov;55(11):3175-3182. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01155-17. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
5
Public's Views toward Return of Secondary Results in Genomic Sequencing: It's (Almost) All about the Choice.公众对基因组测序二次结果反馈的看法:几乎全关乎选择。
J Genet Couns. 2017 Dec;26(6):1197-1212. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0095-6. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
6
Navigating social and ethical challenges of biobanking for human microbiome research.应对人类微生物组研究生物样本库的社会和伦理挑战。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Jan 11;18(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0160-y.
7
Genetics and primary care: where are we headed?遗传学与初级保健:我们将走向何方?
J Transl Med. 2014 Aug 28;12:238. doi: 10.1186/s12967-014-0238-6.
The right to an open future concerning genetic information.
关于遗传信息的开放未来的权利。
Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(3):21-3. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.879952.
4
Predictive genomic testing of children for adult onset disorders: a Canadian perspective.对儿童进行成人期疾病的预测性基因组检测:加拿大视角。
Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(3):19-21. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.879960.
5
Addressing the ethical challenges in genetic testing and sequencing of children.探讨儿童基因检测和测序中的伦理挑战。
Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(3):3-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.879945.
6
Managing incidental genomic findings in clinical trials: fulfillment of the principle of justice.在临床试验中管理偶然发现的基因组结果:实现公正原则。
PLoS Med. 2014 Jan;11(1):e1001584. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001584. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
7
Returning genetic research results: study type matters.反馈基因研究结果:研究类型很重要。
Per Med. 2013 Jan;10(1):27-34. doi: 10.2217/pme.12.109.
8
Paternalism and the ACMG recommendations on genomic incidental findings: patients seen but not heard.家长主义与美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会关于基因组偶然发现的建议:患者被看到却未被倾听。
Genet Med. 2013 Sep;15(9):751-2. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.105.
9
Disclosing incidental findings in brain research: the rights of minors in decision-making.在脑科学研究中披露偶发发现:未成年人在决策中的权利。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Nov;38(5):1009-13. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24230. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
10
Return of whole-genome sequencing results in paediatric research: a statement of the P3G international paediatrics platform.儿科研究中全基因组测序结果的反馈:P3G国际儿科平台声明
Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 Jan;22(1):3-5. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.176. Epub 2013 Aug 7.