Cardona Genís, Gómez Marcelo, Quevedo Lluïsa, Gispets Joan
Research Group of Centre Universitari de la Visió, Optics and Optometry Department, Technical University of Catalonia, Spain.
Cottet Optics, Barcelona, Spain.
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2014 Oct;37(5):363-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2014.05.005. Epub 2014 Jun 8.
A study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of three different strategies aiming at increasing spontaneous eyeblink rate (SEBR) during computer use.
A total of 12 subjects (5 female) with a mean age of 28.7 years were instructed to read a text presented on a computer display terminal during 15min. Four reading sessions (reference and three "blinking events" [BE]) were programmed in which SEBR was digitally recorded. "Blinking events" were based on either a slight distortion of the text characters or on the presentation of a white screen instead of the text, with or without accompanying blinking instructions. All BE had a duration of 20ms and occurred every 15s. Participants graded the intrusiveness of each BE configuration, and the number of lines participants read in each session was recorded.
Data from 11 subjects was analysed. A statistically significant difference in SEBR was encountered between the experimental configuration consisting on a white screen plus blinking instructions (7.8 blinks/min) and both reference (5.2 blinks/min; p=0.049) and white screen without blinking instructions (4.8 blinks/min; p=0.038). All three BE had superior levels of intrusiveness than reference conditions, although the performance of participants (line count) was not compromised.
The joint contribution of white screen and blinking instructions has been shown to result in a short term improvement in blinking rate in the present sample of non-dry eye computer users. Further work is necessary to improve the acceptance of any BE aiming at influencing SEBR.
设计一项研究以评估三种不同策略在计算机使用过程中提高自发眨眼率(SEBR)的效果。
共有12名受试者(5名女性),平均年龄28.7岁,被要求在15分钟内阅读计算机显示屏上呈现的一篇文章。安排了四个阅读时段(一个参考时段和三个“眨眼事件”[BE]),期间对SEBR进行数字记录。“眨眼事件”基于文本字符的轻微变形或呈现白色屏幕而非文本,并伴有或不伴有眨眼提示。所有BE的持续时间为20毫秒,每15秒出现一次。参与者对每种BE配置的干扰程度进行评分,并记录每个时段参与者阅读的行数。
分析了11名受试者的数据。在由白色屏幕加眨眼提示组成的实验配置(7.8次眨眼/分钟)与参考配置(5.2次眨眼/分钟;p = 0.049)和无眨眼提示的白色屏幕配置(4.8次眨眼/分钟;p = 0.038)之间,SEBR存在统计学上的显著差异。尽管参与者的表现(行数统计)未受影响,但所有三种BE的干扰程度均高于参考条件。
在本非干眼计算机用户样本中,白色屏幕和眨眼提示的共同作用已被证明可导致眨眼率的短期提高。有必要进一步开展工作以提高旨在影响SEBR的任何BE的可接受性。