• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双相情感障碍的经济学评估:系统评价与批判性评估

Economic evaluations in bipolar disorder: a systematic review and critical appraisal.

作者信息

Abdul Pari Anees Ahmed, Simon Judit, Wolstenholme Jane, Geddes John R, Goodwin Guy M

机构信息

Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Bipolar Disord. 2014 Sep;16(6):557-82. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12213. Epub 2014 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1111/bdi.12213
PMID:24917477
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bipolar disorder (BD) is a chronic illness and is one of the worldwide leading causes of disability. It is often a lifelong illness and incurs a substantial economic burden on the health care system, the patients, and society as a whole. However, there are few studies evaluating the economic impact of alternative strategies in the management of BD.

OBJECTIVES

We reviewed and critically appraised the available published economic evidence on BD management. In addition, we explored advantages and disadvantages of different methods used in the economic evaluation of the management of BD.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was undertaken using seven electronic databases to identify all English language articles published between January 1980 and March 2012 that provided data on complete economic evaluations for any treatment strategy for BD. The quality of included studies was appraised according to recommendations from the Cochrane Collaboration.

RESULTS

A total of 7,284 citations were obtained. After initial screening, 20 eligible studies were identified, five of which were trial-based, and 15 of which were model-based economic evaluations. Given the variability in methods and the quality of the identified studies, no conclusive recommendation for the most cost-effective therapy for BD could be provided.

CONCLUSIONS

The cost-effectiveness of different treatment strategies varied between settings, and transferability of these results across settings remains questionable. Although additional research using a longer time horizon is required to validate the findings for trial-based economic evaluations, discrete event simulation appears to be the most natural and plausible technique for modeling the cost-effectiveness of alternative BD treatment strategies.

摘要

背景

双相情感障碍(BD)是一种慢性疾病,是全球导致残疾的主要原因之一。它通常是一种终身疾病,给医疗保健系统、患者及整个社会带来巨大的经济负担。然而,很少有研究评估双相情感障碍管理中替代策略的经济影响。

目的

我们回顾并批判性地评价了双相情感障碍管理方面已发表的现有经济证据。此外,我们探讨了双相情感障碍管理经济评估中使用的不同方法的优缺点。

方法

使用七个电子数据库进行系统的文献检索,以识别1980年1月至2012年3月期间发表的所有英文文章,这些文章提供了双相情感障碍任何治疗策略的完整经济评估数据。根据Cochrane协作网的建议对纳入研究的质量进行评估。

结果

共获得7284条引文。初步筛选后,确定了20项符合条件的研究,其中5项基于试验,15项基于模型的经济评估。鉴于所确定研究的方法和质量存在差异,无法为双相情感障碍最具成本效益的治疗提供确凿建议。

结论

不同治疗策略的成本效益因环境而异,这些结果在不同环境中的可转移性仍值得怀疑。虽然需要使用更长时间跨度的额外研究来验证基于试验的经济评估结果,但离散事件模拟似乎是模拟双相情感障碍替代治疗策略成本效益的最自然和合理的技术。

相似文献

1
Economic evaluations in bipolar disorder: a systematic review and critical appraisal.双相情感障碍的经济学评估:系统评价与批判性评估
Bipolar Disord. 2014 Sep;16(6):557-82. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12213. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
2
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
3
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal of Economic Evaluations of Pharmacological Interventions for People with Bipolar Disorder.双相情感障碍患者药物干预经济评估的系统评价与批判性评估
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Mar;35(3):271-296. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0473-1.
6
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.
7
A systematic review and economic evaluation of the use of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors, adalimumab and infliximab, for Crohn's disease.TNF-α 抑制剂(阿达木单抗和英夫利昔单抗)治疗克罗恩病的系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Feb;15(6):1-244. doi: 10.3310/hta15060.
8
Management of frozen shoulder: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.冻结肩的治疗:系统评价和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(11):1-264. doi: 10.3310/hta16110.
9
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
10
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing work life through social cognition: the effect of SCIT in bipolar disorder.通过社会认知改善工作生活:社交认知训练(SCIT)对双相情感障碍的影响。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 30;15:1470191. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1470191. eCollection 2024.
2
Appraisal of patient-level health economic models of severe mental illness: systematic review.严重精神疾病患者层面健康经济模型评估:系统评价
Br J Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 19;220(2):1-12. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2021.121.
3
Characteristics of help-seeking behavior among bipolar disorder patients: A study in Hunan, China.
双相情感障碍患者寻求帮助行为的特征:一项在中国湖南开展的研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(46):e17687. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017687.
4
Targets and outcomes of psychotherapies for mental disorders: an overview.精神障碍心理治疗的目标与结果:综述
World Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;18(3):276-285. doi: 10.1002/wps.20661.
5
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluations of Psychological Therapies for Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Review.精神分裂症和双相情感障碍的心理治疗的成本效益评估:系统评价。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019;35(4):317-326. doi: 10.1017/S0266462319000448. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
6
Comparative economic evaluation of quetiapine plus lamotrigine combination vs quetiapine monotherapy (and folic acid vs placebo) in patients with bipolar depression (CEQUEL).喹硫平联合拉莫三嗪与喹硫平单药治疗(叶酸与安慰剂)双相抑郁患者的成本效果比较(CEQUEL)。
Bipolar Disord. 2018 Dec;20(8):733-745. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12713. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
7
The Behavioral Approach System (BAS) Model of Vulnerability to Bipolar Disorder: Evidence of a Continuum in BAS Sensitivity across Adolescence.双相障碍易感性的行为趋近系统(BAS)模型:青少年期 BAS 敏感性连续体的证据。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2018 Aug;46(6):1333-1349. doi: 10.1007/s10802-017-0363-9.
8
Computer simulation models of pre-diabetes populations: a systematic review protocol.糖尿病前期人群的计算机模拟模型:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 5;7(10):e014954. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014954.
9
Is treatment for bipolar disorder more effective earlier in illness course? A comprehensive literature review.双相障碍治疗在疾病早期更有效吗?一项全面的文献综述。
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2016 Dec;4(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40345-016-0060-6. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
10
Welfarism versus extra-welfarism: can the choice of economic evaluation approach impact on the adoption decisions recommended by economic evaluation studies?福利主义与超福利主义:经济评价方法的选择会影响经济评价研究推荐的采用决策吗?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Jun;33(6):571-9. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0261-3.