Long Justin B, Birmingham Patrick K, De Oliveira Gildasio S, Schaldenbrand Katie M, Suresh Santhanam
From the Department of Anesthesiology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago; and Department of Anesthesiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Anesth Analg. 2014 Aug;119(2):395-399. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000284.
Currently, there is not enough evidence to support the safety of the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block when used to ameliorate postoperative pain in children. Safety concerns have been repeatedly mentioned as a major barrier to performing large randomized trials in children. The main objective of the current investigation was to determine the incidence of overall and specific complications resulting from the performance of the TAP block in children. In addition, we evaluated patterns of local anesthetic dosage selection in the same population.
This was an observational study using the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network database. A complication from the TAP block was defined by the presence of at least one of the following intraoperative and/or postoperative factors: puncture of the peritoneum or organs, vascular puncture, cardiovascular, pulmonary and/or neurological symptoms/signs, hematoma, and infection. Additional analyses were performed to identify patterns of local anesthetic dosage.
One thousand nine hundred ninety-four children receiving a TAP block were included in the analysis. Only 2 complications were reported: a vascular aspiration of blood before local anesthetic injection and a peritoneal puncture resulting in an overall incidence of complications (95% CI) of 0.1% (0.02%-0.3%) and a specific incidence of complications (vascular aspiration or peritoneal puncture) of 0.05% (0.0054%-0.2000%). Neither of these complications resulted in additional interventions or sequelae. The median (95% range) for the local anesthetic dose per weight for bilateral TAP blocks was 1.0 (0.47-2.29) mg of bupivacaine equivalents per kilogram; however, subjects' weights were not sufficient to explain much of the variability in dose. One hundred thirty-five of 1944 (6.9%; 95% CI, 5.8%-8.1%) subjects received doses that could be potentially toxic. Subjects who received potentially toxic doses were younger than subjects who did not receive potentially toxic doses, 64 (19-100) months and 108 (45-158) months, respectively (P < 0.001).
The upper incidence of overall complications associated with the TAP block in children was 0.3%. More important, complications were very minor and did not require any additional interventions. In contrast, the large variability of local anesthetic dosage used can not only minimize potential analgesic benefits of the TAP block but also result in local anesthetic toxicity. Safety concerns should not be a major barrier to performing randomized trials to test the efficacy of the TAP block in children as long as appropriate local anesthetic dose regimens are selected.
目前,尚无足够证据支持腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞用于改善儿童术后疼痛的安全性。安全问题一直被反复提及,是开展儿童大型随机试验的主要障碍。本研究的主要目的是确定儿童TAP阻滞导致的总体及特定并发症的发生率。此外,我们评估了同一人群中局部麻醉药剂量选择模式。
这是一项利用儿科区域麻醉网络数据库的观察性研究。TAP阻滞的并发症定义为存在以下至少一种术中及/或术后因素:腹膜或器官穿刺、血管穿刺、心血管、肺及/或神经症状/体征、血肿和感染。进行了额外分析以确定局部麻醉药剂量模式。
1994例接受TAP阻滞的儿童纳入分析。仅报告了2例并发症:局部麻醉药注射前血管内抽出血液和腹膜穿刺,总体并发症发生率(95%CI)为0.1%(0.02%-0.3%),特定并发症(血管内抽血或腹膜穿刺)发生率为0.05%(0.0054%-0.2000%)。这些并发症均未导致额外干预或后遗症。双侧TAP阻滞每千克体重局部麻醉药剂量的中位数(95%范围)为1.0(0.47-2.29)毫克布比卡因当量;然而,受试者体重不足以解释剂量的大部分变异性。1944例受试者中有135例(6.9%;95%CI,5.8%-8.1%)接受了可能有毒性的剂量。接受可能有毒性剂量的受试者比未接受可能有毒性剂量的受试者年龄小,分别为64(19-100)个月和108(45-158)个月(P<0.001)。
儿童TAP阻滞相关总体并发症的发生率上限为0.3%。更重要的是,并发症非常轻微,不需要任何额外干预。相比之下,局部麻醉药使用剂量的巨大变异性不仅会降低TAP阻滞的潜在镇痛效果,还会导致局部麻醉药毒性。只要选择合适的局部麻醉药剂量方案,安全问题不应成为开展随机试验以检验TAP阻滞在儿童中疗效的主要障碍。