Nasreen Farah, Athar Manazir, Khalid Atif, Mallur Divyashree S
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2021 Aug;49(4):304-311. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2021.790.
Paediatric pain management has remained understated practice over a period of time. Recently ultrasound-guided (USG) guided techniques are gaining popularity for perioperative analgesia, especially in the paediatric population. So, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of reduced dose ropivacaine-dexmedetomidine combination compared to standard 0.375% ropivacaine in USG guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block.
Sixty children of either sex, aged 2-10 years, posted for elective open herniotomy under general anaesthesia were randomly divided into two groups of 30 patients each. Group RD received 0.2% ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine 1 mg kg 1 while group R received 0.375% ropivacaine at 0.5mL kg 1. Meantime to first rescue and total analgesics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) and Ramsay sedation score, haemodynamic parameters and adverse effects were noted.
Time to first rescue analgesia in group RD and group R were 16.32 6 3.11 hours and 10.82 6 2.16 hours, respectively (P < .0001). Mean CHEOPS score were 4.48 6 1.1 and 6.3 6 1.74 (P < .024) in group RD and R. Post-op Ramsay sedation score was significantly greater in group RD. Heart rate and blood pressure remained similar in either of the group. No episode of respiratory depression, bradycardia or hypotension was noted perioperatively.
Combination of 1 mg kg 1 dexmedetomidine with reduced concentration of ropivacaine (0.2%) produced significantly longer duration of post-operative analgesia and lowered post-operative CHEOPS pain score in comparison with 0.375% ropivacaine alone in USG guided TAP block for paediatric hernia repair.
一段时间以来,儿科疼痛管理一直未得到充分重视。近年来,超声引导(USG)技术在围手术期镇痛中越来越受欢迎,尤其是在儿科人群中。因此,本研究的目的是评估与标准0.375%罗哌卡因相比,低剂量罗哌卡因 - 右美托咪定联合用药在超声引导下腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞中的疗效。
60例年龄在2至10岁、拟在全身麻醉下行择期开放性疝修补术的儿童,随机分为两组,每组30例。RD组接受0.2%罗哌卡因与1 mg/kg右美托咪定,而R组接受0.5mL/kg的0.375%罗哌卡因。记录首次补救镇痛时间和总镇痛药物用量、东安大略儿童医院疼痛评分(CHEOPS)和 Ramsay 镇静评分、血流动力学参数及不良反应。
RD组和R组首次补救镇痛时间分别为16.32±3.11小时和10.82±2.16小时(P <.0001)。RD组和R组的平均CHEOPS评分为4.48±1.1和6.3±1.74(P <.024)。RD组术后Ramsay镇静评分显著更高。两组的心率和血压保持相似。围手术期未观察到呼吸抑制、心动过缓或低血压事件。
在超声引导下小儿疝修补术的TAP阻滞中,与单独使用0.375%罗哌卡因相比,1 mg/kg右美托咪定与低浓度罗哌卡因(0.2%)联合使用可产生显著更长的术后镇痛时间,并降低术后CHEOPS疼痛评分。