Law Chi-kin, Snider Anne-Marie, De Leo Diego
Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention, Mt Gravatt Campus, Griffith University, 176 Messines Ridge Road, Mt Gravatt, QLD, 4122, Australia,
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;49(12):1919-28. doi: 10.1007/s00127-014-0905-1. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
A trend of higher suicide rates in rural and remote areas as well as areas with low socioeconomic status has been shown in previous research. Little is known whether the influence of social deprivation on suicide differs between urban and rural areas. This investigation aims to examine how social deprivation influences suicide mortality and to identify which related factors of deprivation have a higher potential to reduce suicide risk in urban and rural Queensland, Australia.
Suicide data from 2004 to 2008 were obtained from the Queensland Suicide Register. Age-standardized suicide rates (15+ years) and rate ratios, with a 95% confidence interval, for 38 Statistical Subdivisions (SSDs) in Queensland were calculated. The influence of deprivation-related variables on suicide and their rural-urban difference were modelled by log-linear regression analyses through backward elimination.
Among the 38 SSDs in Queensland, eight had a higher suicide risk while eleven had a lower rate. Working-age males (15-59 years) had the most pronounced geographic variation in suicide rate. In urban areas, suicide rates were positively associated with tenant households in public housing, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, the unemployment rate and median individual income, but inversely correlated with younger age and households with no internet access. In rural areas, only tenant households in public housing and households with no internet access heightened the risk of suicide, while a negative association was found for younger and older persons, low-skilled workers or labourers, and families with low income and no cars.
The extent to which social deprivation contributes to suicide mortality varies considerably between rural and urban areas.
先前的研究表明,农村和偏远地区以及社会经济地位较低地区的自杀率有上升趋势。社会剥夺对自杀的影响在城乡之间是否存在差异尚不清楚。本调查旨在研究社会剥夺如何影响自杀死亡率,并确定在澳大利亚昆士兰州城乡地区,哪些相关剥夺因素具有较高的降低自杀风险的潜力。
从昆士兰自杀登记处获取2004年至2008年的自杀数据。计算了昆士兰州38个统计分区(SSD)的年龄标准化自杀率(15岁及以上)和率比,并给出95%置信区间。通过向后消除法,采用对数线性回归分析对与剥夺相关的变量对自杀的影响及其城乡差异进行建模。
在昆士兰州的38个统计分区中,8个分区自杀风险较高,11个分区自杀率较低。劳动年龄男性(15 - 59岁)的自杀率在地理上的差异最为明显。在城市地区,自杀率与公共住房中的租户家庭、原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民、失业率和个人收入中位数呈正相关,但与年龄较小和没有互联网接入的家庭呈负相关。在农村地区,只有公共住房中的租户家庭和没有互联网接入的家庭会增加自杀风险,而年龄较小和较大的人群、低技能工人或劳动者以及低收入且没有汽车的家庭则与之呈负相关。
社会剥夺对自杀死亡率的影响程度在城乡之间存在很大差异。