Tougas Cecile T
North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
J Anal Psychol. 2014 Jun;59(3):410-420. doi: 10.1111/1468-5922.12083.
Causality, time, and number are subjectively lived realities and need to be noticed as such. Fundamental to the wide range of living experience, they are also basic to scientific knowing. In this article I examine causality in relation to an article on synchronicity by Harald Atmanspacher and Wolfgang Fach. My examination is neither scientific nor metaphysical, but rather phenomenological, as it is a clarification of form as individual essence of a thing. This non-material form of an individual thing in the widest sense of the word 'thing' was rejected and so lost during modern seventeenth-century science but, renewed now, can help describe synchronicity. A commentary by William Willeford follows.
因果关系、时间和数字是主观体验的现实,需要如此加以注意。它们是广泛生活体验的基础,也是科学认知的基础。在本文中,我结合哈拉尔德·阿特曼斯帕赫尔和沃尔夫冈·法赫关于同步性的一篇文章来探讨因果关系。我的探讨既非科学性的,也非形而上学的,而是现象学的,因为它是对作为事物个体本质的形式的一种阐明。在现代17世纪科学中,这个词最宽泛意义上的个体事物的这种非物质形式被摒弃并因此失落了,但现在得以复兴,能够有助于描述同步性。接着是威廉·威利福德的一篇评论。