• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于婴儿与鸟类:复杂的工具行为并不足以促成创造全新因果干预能力的进化。

Of babies and birds: complex tool behaviours are not sufficient for the evolution of the ability to create a novel causal intervention.

作者信息

Taylor Alex H, Cheke Lucy G, Waismeyer Anna, Meltzoff Andrew N, Miller Rachael, Gopnik Alison, Clayton Nicola S, Gray Russell D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK Department of Psychology, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand

Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Jul 22;281(1787). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0837. Epub 2014 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2014.0837
PMID:24920476
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4071556/
Abstract

Humans are capable of simply observing a correlation between cause and effect, and then producing a novel behavioural pattern in order to recreate the same outcome. However, it is unclear how the ability to create such causal interventions evolved. Here, we show that while 24-month-old children can produce an effective, novel action after observing a correlation, tool-making New Caledonian crows cannot. These results suggest that complex tool behaviours are not sufficient for the evolution of this ability, and that causal interventions can be cognitively and evolutionarily disassociated from other types of causal understanding.

摘要

人类能够仅仅通过观察因果关系,然后创造出一种新的行为模式来重现相同的结果。然而,尚不清楚创造这种因果干预的能力是如何进化的。在这里,我们表明,虽然24个月大的儿童在观察到一种关联后能够做出有效的新动作,但制造工具的新喀里多尼亚乌鸦却做不到。这些结果表明,复杂的工具行为对于这种能力的进化并不充分,而且因果干预在认知和进化上可能与其他类型的因果理解相分离。

相似文献

1
Of babies and birds: complex tool behaviours are not sufficient for the evolution of the ability to create a novel causal intervention.关于婴儿与鸟类:复杂的工具行为并不足以促成创造全新因果干预能力的进化。
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Jul 22;281(1787). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0837. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
2
Hook tool manufacture in New Caledonian crows: behavioural variation and the influence of raw materials.新喀里多尼亚乌鸦的钩子工具制造:行为差异与原材料的影响
BMC Biol. 2015 Nov 18;13:97. doi: 10.1186/s12915-015-0204-7.
3
New Caledonian crows reason about hidden causal agents.新喀鸦能够推理隐藏的因果关系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 2;109(40):16389-91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1208724109. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
4
New Caledonian crows rapidly solve a collaborative problem without cooperative cognition.新喀里多尼亚乌鸦在没有合作认知的情况下迅速解决协作问题。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 12;10(8):e0133253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133253. eCollection 2015.
5
An investigation into the cognition behind spontaneous string pulling in New Caledonian crows.对新喀里多尼亚乌鸦自发性弦拉行为背后认知的调查。
PLoS One. 2010 Feb 22;5(2):e9345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009345.
6
New Caledonian crows learn the functional properties of novel tool types.新喀鸦学习新型工具的功能特性。
PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e26887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026887. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
7
An end to insight? New Caledonian crows can spontaneously solve problems without planning their actions.洞察的终结?新喀鸦可以自发地解决问题,而无需计划其行动。
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Dec 22;279(1749):4977-81. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1998. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
8
Complex cognition and behavioural innovation in New Caledonian crows.新喀里多尼亚乌鸦的复杂认知和行为创新。
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 7;277(1694):2637-43. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0285. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
9
Corvids create novel causal interventions after all.毕竟,鸦科动物会创造新颖的因果干预措施。
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 May 7;282(1806):20142504. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2504. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
10
No conclusive evidence that corvids can create novel causal interventions.没有确凿证据表明鸦科动物能够创造新的因果干预措施。
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Aug 22;282(1813):20150796. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0796.

引用本文的文献

1
The irreconcilability of insight.见解的不可调和性。
Anim Cogn. 2024 Mar 2;27(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01844-y.
2
Sense of agency and its disturbances: A systematic review targeting the intentional binding effect in neuropsychiatric disorders.主体感及其障碍:针对神经精神障碍中意图绑定效应的系统综述。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024 Jan;78(1):3-18. doi: 10.1111/pcn.13601. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
3
Old and New Approaches to Animal Cognition: There Is Not "One Cognition".动物认知的新旧方法:不存在“单一认知”。
J Intell. 2020 Jul 2;8(3):28. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence8030028.
4
From movement to action: An EEG study into the emerging sense of agency in early infancy.从运动到行动:一项关于婴儿早期agency 感出现的 EEG 研究。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Apr;42:100760. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100760. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
5
Chimpanzees use observed temporal directionality to learn novel causal relations.黑猩猩利用观察到的时间方向性来学习新的因果关系。
Primates. 2019 Nov;60(6):517-524. doi: 10.1007/s10329-019-00754-9. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
6
New Caledonian crows infer the weight of objects from observing their movements in a breeze.新喀鸦通过观察物体在微风中的运动来推断其重量。
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Jan 16;286(1894):20182332. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.2332.
7
Sense of agency in the human brain.人类大脑中的主体感。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Apr;18(4):196-207. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2017.14. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
8
How Insightful Is 'Insight'? New Caledonian Crows Do Not Attend to Object Weight during Spontaneous Stone Dropping.“洞察力”有多具洞察力?新喀里多尼亚乌鸦在自发扔石头时不会考虑物体重量。
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 14;11(12):e0167419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167419. eCollection 2016.
9
Performance in Object-Choice Aesop's Fable Tasks Are Influenced by Object Biases in New Caledonian Crows but not in Human Children.新喀里多尼亚乌鸦在目标选择伊索寓言任务中的表现受目标偏好影响,而人类儿童则不受此影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 9;11(12):e0168056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168056. eCollection 2016.
10
No conclusive evidence that corvids can create novel causal interventions.没有确凿证据表明鸦科动物能够创造新的因果干预措施。
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Aug 22;282(1813):20150796. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0796.

本文引用的文献

1
Using the Aesop's fable paradigm to investigate causal understanding of water displacement by New Caledonian crows.利用伊索寓言范式研究新喀里多尼亚乌鸦对水位移的因果理解。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 26;9(3):e92895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092895. eCollection 2014.
2
Reply to Dymond et al.: Clear evidence of habituation counters counterbalancing.对戴蒙德等人的回应:习惯化的明确证据反驳了平衡。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 29;110(5):E337. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219586110.
3
Reply to Boogert et al.: The devil is unlikely to be in association or distraction.回复布格特等人:问题不太可能出在关联或干扰上。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 22;110(4):E274. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220564110.
4
New Caledonian crows reason about hidden causal agents.新喀鸦能够推理隐藏的因果关系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 2;109(40):16389-91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1208724109. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
5
How do children solve Aesop's Fable?儿童如何解决《伊索寓言》中的问题?
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40574. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040574. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
6
Learning about causes from people: observational causal learning in 24-month-old infants.从他人处学习原因:24 个月大婴儿的观察性因果学习。
Dev Psychol. 2012 Sep;48(5):1215-28. doi: 10.1037/a0027440. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
7
New Caledonian crows learn the functional properties of novel tool types.新喀鸦学习新型工具的功能特性。
PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e26887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026887. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
8
Context-dependent tool use in New Caledonian crows.情境依赖工具使用在新喀里多尼亚乌鸦中。
Biol Lett. 2012 Apr 23;8(2):205-7. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0782. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
9
Tool-use and instrumental learning in the Eurasian jay (Garrulus glandarius).欧亚喜鹊(Garrulus glandarius)的工具使用和工具性学习。
Anim Cogn. 2011 May;14(3):441-55. doi: 10.1007/s10071-011-0379-4. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
10
New Caledonian crows use tools for non-foraging activities.新喀鸦会将工具用于非觅食活动。
Anim Cogn. 2011 May;14(3):459-64. doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0366-1. Epub 2010 Dec 24.