Jelbert Sarah A, Singh Puja J, Gray Russell D, Taylor Alex H
School of Psychology, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.
School of Psychology, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand; School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 12;10(8):e0133253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133253. eCollection 2015.
There is growing comparative evidence that the cognitive bases of cooperation are not unique to humans. However, the selective pressures that lead to the evolution of these mechanisms remain unclear. Here we show that while tool-making New Caledonian crows can produce collaborative behavior, they do not understand the causality of cooperation nor show sensitivity to inequity. Instead, the collaborative behavior produced appears to have been underpinned by the transfer of prior experience. These results suggest that a number of possible selective pressures, including tool manufacture and mobbing behaviours, have not led to the evolution of cooperative cognition in this species. They show that causal cognition can evolve in a domain specific manner-understanding the properties and flexible uses of physical tools does not necessarily enable animals to grasp that a conspecific can be used as a social tool.
越来越多的比较证据表明,合作的认知基础并非人类所独有。然而,导致这些机制进化的选择压力仍不明确。我们在此表明,虽然会制造工具的新喀里多尼亚乌鸦能够产生协作行为,但它们不理解合作的因果关系,对不公平也不敏感。相反,所产生的协作行为似乎是由先前经验的传递所支撑的。这些结果表明,包括工具制造和围攻行为在内的一些可能的选择压力,并未导致该物种合作认知的进化。它们表明,因果认知可以以特定领域的方式进化——理解物理工具的特性和灵活用途并不一定能使动物理解同种个体可以被用作社会工具。