• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

难治性心绞痛患者决策辅助工具的开发:三阶段试点研究方案。

Development of a patient decision aid for people with refractory angina: protocol for a three-phase pilot study.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main St, W, Hamilton ON, L8N 3Z5, Canada.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Jun 11;12:93. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-93.

DOI:10.1186/1477-7525-12-93
PMID:24920518
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4065088/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Refractory angina is a severe chronic disease, defined as angina which cannot be controlled by usual treatments for heart disease. This disease is frightening, debilitating, and difficult to manage. Many people suffering refractory have inadequate pain relief, continually revisit emergency departments for help, undergo repeated cardiac investigations, and struggle with obtaining appropriate care. There is no clear framework to help people understand the risks and benefits of available treatment options in Canada. Some treatments for refractory angina are invasive, while others are not covered by provincial health insurance plans. Effective care for refractory angina sufferers in Canada is critically underdeveloped; it is important that healthcare professionals and refractory angina sufferers alike understand the treatment options and their implications. This proposal builds on the recent Canadian practice guidelines for the management of refractory angina. We propose to develop a decision support tool in order to help people suffering from refractory angina make well-informed decisions about their healthcare and reduce their uncertainty about treatment options.

METHODS

This project will be conducted in three phases: a) development of the support tool with input from clinical experts, the Canadian refractory angina guidelines, and people living with refractory angina, b) pilot testing of the usability of the tool, and c) formal preliminary evaluation of the effectiveness of the support tool to help people make informed decisions about treatment options.

DISCUSSION

A decision support tool for refractory angina is needed and the available data suggest that by developing such a tool, we may be able to help refractory angina sufferers better understand their condition and the effectiveness of available treatment options (in their respective clinical settings) as well as their implications (e.g. risks vs. benefits). By virtue of this tool, we may also be able to facilitate identification and inclusion of patients' values and preferences in the decision making process. This is particularly important as refractory angina is an intractable condition, necessitating that the selected course of treatment be lifelong. This study will yield a much needed patient decision aid for people living with refractory angina and pilot data to support a subsequent effectiveness study.

摘要

背景

难治性心绞痛是一种严重的慢性疾病,定义为通常的心脏病治疗无法控制的心绞痛。这种疾病令人恐惧、使人虚弱,难以控制。许多患有难治性心绞痛的人疼痛缓解不足,不断到急诊室寻求帮助,反复进行心脏检查,并难以获得适当的护理。加拿大没有明确的框架来帮助人们了解可用治疗方案的风险和益处。一些难治性心绞痛的治疗方法具有侵入性,而另一些则不在省级医疗保险计划范围内。加拿大对难治性心绞痛患者的有效护理严重不足;医疗保健专业人员和难治性心绞痛患者都了解治疗方案及其影响非常重要。本提案建立在最近加拿大难治性心绞痛管理实践指南的基础上。我们建议开发一个决策支持工具,以帮助患有难治性心绞痛的人就其医疗保健做出明智的决策,并减少他们对治疗方案的不确定性。

方法

该项目将分三个阶段进行:a)在临床专家、加拿大难治性心绞痛指南和难治性心绞痛患者的输入下开发支持工具,b)测试工具的可用性,c)正式初步评估支持工具帮助人们就治疗方案做出明智决策的有效性。

讨论

需要一种难治性心绞痛的决策支持工具,并且现有数据表明,通过开发这样的工具,我们也许能够帮助难治性心绞痛患者更好地了解他们的病情和可用治疗方案的有效性(在各自的临床环境中)以及它们的影响(例如,风险与收益)。通过该工具,我们也许还能够促进识别和纳入患者的价值观和偏好在决策过程中。这一点尤其重要,因为难治性心绞痛是一种难以治愈的疾病,需要终身选择治疗方案。这项研究将为难治性心绞痛患者提供急需的患者决策辅助工具,并提供试点数据来支持随后的有效性研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b975/4065088/e50ddfe1c68d/1477-7525-12-93-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b975/4065088/e50ddfe1c68d/1477-7525-12-93-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b975/4065088/e50ddfe1c68d/1477-7525-12-93-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a patient decision aid for people with refractory angina: protocol for a three-phase pilot study.难治性心绞痛患者决策辅助工具的开发:三阶段试点研究方案。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Jun 11;12:93. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-93.
2
Enhanced External Counterpulsation (EECP): An Evidence-Based Analysis.增强型体外反搏(EECP):基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(5):1-70. Epub 2006 Mar 1.
3
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临健康治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 28(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4.
4
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5(10):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3.
5
Development and user-testing of a digital patient decision aid to facilitate shared decision-making for people with stable angina.开发并测试一款数字化患者决策辅助工具,以促进稳定性心绞痛患者的共同决策。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 May 27;22(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01882-x.
6
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8(3):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub2.
7
Management of patients with refractory angina: Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Pain Society joint guidelines.难治性心绞痛患者的管理:加拿大心血管学会/加拿大疼痛学会联合指南。
Can J Cardiol. 2012 Mar-Apr;28(2 Suppl):S20-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2011.07.007.
8
High Users of Healthcare Services: Development and Alpha Testing of a Patient Decision Aid for Case Management.高医疗服务使用者:病例管理患者决策辅助工具的开发和α测试。
Patient. 2020 Dec;13(6):757-766. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00465-0. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
9
Reasons underpinning patients' preferences for various angina treatments.患者对各种心绞痛治疗方法偏好的潜在原因。
Health Expect. 2004 Sep;7(3):246-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00282.x.
10
Improving healthcare consumer effectiveness: an Animated, Self-serve, Web-based Research Tool (ANSWER) for people with early rheumatoid arthritis.提高医疗保健消费者效能:一种面向早期类风湿性关节炎患者的动画式、自助式、基于网络的研究工具(ANSWER)
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 Aug 20;9:40. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-40.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient engagement partnerships in clinical trials (PEP-CT): protocol for the systematic development and testing of patient partner and investigator decision aids.患者参与临床试验合作关系(PEP-CT):患者伙伴和研究者决策辅助工具的系统开发和测试的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 21;12(2):e060267. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060267.
2
Development and evaluation of a patient decision aid for patients considering ongoing medical or surgical treatment options for ulcerative colitis using a mixed-methods approach: protocol for DISCUSS study.采用混合方法研究开发和评估溃疡性结肠炎患者考虑持续医学或手术治疗选择的患者决策辅助工具:DISCUSS 研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 14;10(1):e031845. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031845.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers.呈现决策结果的定量信息:为患者决策辅助工具开发者提供风险沟通基础
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S7. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
2
Basing information on comprehensive, critically appraised, and up-to-date syntheses of the scientific evidence: a quality dimension of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards.基于对科学证据的全面、批判性评价和最新综合:国际患者决策辅助标准的一个质量维度。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S5. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S5. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
3
Refractory angina frequencies during 7 weeks treatment by enhanced external counterpulsation in coronary artery disease patients with and without diabetes.
冠心病合并或不合并糖尿病患者在接受增强型体外反搏治疗7周期间的难治性心绞痛发作频率
Ann Card Anaesth. 2019 Jul-Sep;22(3):278-282. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_86_18.
4
Technology-Enabled Remote Monitoring and Self-Management - Vision for Patient Empowerment Following Cardiac and Vascular Surgery: User Testing and Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol.技术支持的远程监测与自我管理——心脏和血管手术后患者赋权愿景:用户测试与随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Aug 1;5(3):e149. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5763.
5
Usability evaluation and adaptation of the e-health Personal Patient Profile-Prostate decision aid for Spanish-speaking Latino men.针对说西班牙语的拉丁裔男性的电子健康个人患者档案-前列腺决策辅助工具的可用性评估与适配
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Jul 24;15:56. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0180-4.
An evidence-based shared decision making programme on the prevention of myocardial infarction in type 2 diabetes: protocol of a randomised-controlled trial.
基于证据的 2 型糖尿病心肌梗死预防共享决策方案:一项随机对照试验方案。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Oct 19;14:155. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-155.
4
Management of patients with refractory angina: Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Pain Society joint guidelines.难治性心绞痛患者的管理:加拿大心血管学会/加拿大疼痛学会联合指南。
Can J Cardiol. 2012 Mar-Apr;28(2 Suppl):S20-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2011.07.007.
5
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5(10):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3.
6
Adapting clinical practice guidelines to local context and assessing barriers to their use.使临床实践指南适应当地情况并评估其使用的障碍。
CMAJ. 2010 Feb 9;182(2):E78-84. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.081232. Epub 2009 Dec 7.
7
A new option for the "no-option" patient with refractory angina?对于难治性心绞痛的“无选择”患者而言,一种新的选择?
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Sep 1;74(3):395-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22223.
8
Recommendations for advancing the care of Canadians living with refractory angina pectoris: a Canadian Cardiovascular Society position statement.改善难治性心绞痛加拿大患者护理的建议:加拿大心血管学会立场声明
Can J Cardiol. 2009 Jul;25(7):399-401. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(09)70501-x.
9
Assessment of preferences for treatment: validation of a measure.治疗偏好评估:一种测量方法的验证
Res Nurs Health. 2009 Aug;32(4):419-31. doi: 10.1002/nur.20329.
10
Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions.临床实践中实施共同决策的障碍与促进因素:卫生专业人员认知的系统评价更新
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Dec;73(3):526-35. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.018. Epub 2008 Aug 26.