Gallopel-Morvan Karine, Moodie Crawford, Eker Figen, Beguinot Emmanuelle, Martinet Yves
EHESP School of Public Health, EA MOS (Equipe d'Accueil en Management des Organisations de Santé), Rennes Cx, France.
Centre for Tobacco Control Research, University of Stirling, Scotland, UK.
Tob Control. 2015 Mar;24(e1):e39-44. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051513. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
We explored, for the first time, young adult roll-your-own smokers' response to using plain packaging in real-world settings.
Naturalistic research was employed, where 133 French young adult smokers (18-25 years of age) used plain roll-your-own packs for 10 days; the plain packs they were provided with contained their usual brand of rolling tobacco and displayed the name of their usual brand. Participants were recruited in five cities in France (Paris, Marseille, Metz, Nantes, Toulouse) and completed two questionnaires to measure their response to their own branded packs and the plain packs. Both questionnaires assessed pack perceptions, brand attachment, product perceptions (eg, taste, quality, natural), feelings about smoking (satisfying, pleasurable), feelings when using the pack in front of others (embarrassment, image), warning response (credibility, awareness of risks) and smoking-related behaviour (eg, consumption, quitting).
Compared to their own fully branded packs, plain packs were associated with less positive pack and product perceptions, lower brand attachment and less positive feelings about smoking and feelings when using the pack in front of others. Participants were also more likely to report feeling like reducing consumption and quitting when using the plain packs, and more likely to feel like missing out on rolling a cigarette. No significant differences between the two pack types (plain and branded) were found in terms of credibility of warnings and perceptions of level of tar.
The study suggests that the impacts of plain packaging for roll-your-own cigarette smokers are the same as for smokers of factory-made cigarettes.
我们首次探究了年轻的手卷烟吸烟者在现实环境中对使用素面包装的反应。
采用自然主义研究方法,133名法国年轻吸烟者(18至25岁)使用素面手卷烟包装10天;他们所得到的素面包装内装有其常用品牌的手卷烟丝,并展示了其常用品牌的名称。在法国的五个城市(巴黎、马赛、梅斯、南特、图卢兹)招募了参与者,他们完成了两份问卷,以测量他们对自有品牌包装和素面包装的反应。两份问卷都评估了包装认知、品牌依恋、产品认知(如味道、质量、天然程度)、吸烟感受(满足、愉悦)、在他人面前使用包装时的感受(尴尬、形象)、警示反应(可信度、风险意识)以及与吸烟相关的行为(如消费、戒烟)。
与他们自己的全品牌包装相比,素面包装与不那么积极的包装和产品认知、较低的品牌依恋以及在他人面前使用包装时不那么积极的吸烟感受相关。参与者在使用素面包装时也更有可能表示想要减少消费和戒烟,并且更有可能感觉错过卷制香烟的过程。在警示的可信度和焦油含量认知方面,两种包装类型(素面和品牌)之间未发现显著差异。
该研究表明,素面包装对手卷烟吸烟者的影响与对机制卷烟吸烟者的影响相同。