• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Tracking the Evil Eye: Trait Anger and Selective Attention within Ambiguously Hostile Scenes.追踪“邪眼”:特质愤怒与模糊敌意场景中的选择性注意
J Res Pers. 2007 Jun 1;41(3):650-666. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.07.003.
2
Measuring Hostile Interpretation Bias: The WSAP-Hostility Scale.测量敌意解释偏差:WSAP-敌意量表。
Assessment. 2016 Dec;23(6):707-719. doi: 10.1177/1073191115599052. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
3
Hostile Attribution Bias and Anger Rumination Sequentially Mediate the Association Between Trait Anger and Reactive Aggression.敌意归因偏差和愤怒反刍依次介导特质愤怒与反应性攻击之间的关联。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 12;12:778695. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.778695. eCollection 2021.
4
Modification of Hostile Interpretation Bias in Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial.抑郁患者敌意解释偏差的修正:一项随机对照试验
Behav Ther. 2018 Mar;49(2):198-211. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
5
Transdiagnostic cognitive processes in high trait anger.高特质愤怒的跨诊断认知过程。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Mar;31(2):193-202. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.10.003. Epub 2010 Oct 31.
6
Hostile interpretation bias in depression.抑郁症中的敌意解释偏差。
J Affect Disord. 2016 Oct;203:9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.05.070. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
7
Attention and interpretation processes and trait anger experience, expression, and control.注意力与解读过程以及特质愤怒体验、表达和控制。
Cogn Emot. 2017 Nov;31(7):1453-1464. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1231663. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
8
Interrelations of Justice, Rejection, Provocation, and Moral Disgust Sensitivity and Their Links with the Hostile Attribution Bias, Trait Anger, and Aggression.正义、排斥、挑衅与道德厌恶敏感性的相互关系及其与敌意归因偏差、特质愤怒和攻击行为的联系。
Front Psychol. 2016 May 30;7:795. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00795. eCollection 2016.
9
Eye Gaze Patterns Associated with Aggressive Tendencies in Adolescence.与青少年攻击倾向相关的眼球注视模式。
Psychiatr Q. 2018 Sep;89(3):747-756. doi: 10.1007/s11126-018-9573-8.
10
Modification of hostile attribution bias reduces self-reported reactive aggressive behavior in adolescents.敌意归因偏差的修正可减少青少年自我报告的反应性攻击行为。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Jun;194:104811. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104811. Epub 2020 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Attributional and attentional patterns in the perception of ambiguous harmful encounters involving peer and authority figures.在涉及同伴和权威人物的模糊有害遭遇认知中的归因模式和注意力模式。
Curr Issues Personal Psychol. 2023 Sep 21;12(3):193-201. doi: 10.5114/cipp/166751. eCollection 2024.
2
When feeling is for seeing: comparing the effects of motivated perception between fear and anger on ambiguous threatening stimuli.当感觉用于视觉:比较恐惧和愤怒状态下动机性知觉对模糊威胁性刺激的影响
Psychol Res. 2024 Mar;88(2):379-388. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01867-z. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
3
Linking Sleep and Aggression: Examining the Role of Response Inhibition and Emotional Processing.将睡眠与攻击性联系起来:探究反应抑制和情绪加工的作用。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2023 Mar;11(2):271-289. doi: 10.1177/21677026221100235. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
4
Hostility bias or sadness bias in excluded individuals: does anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of right VLPFC vs. left DLPFC have a mitigating effect?被排斥个体的敌意偏见或悲伤偏见:右 VLPFC 与左 DLPFC 的阳极经颅直流电刺激是否具有缓解作用?
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2022 Oct;22(5):1063-1077. doi: 10.3758/s13415-022-01008-w. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
5
CBM-I Training and Its Effect on Interpretations of Intent, Facial Expressions, Attention and Aggressive Behavior.基于计算机的心智化干预训练及其对意图解读、面部表情、注意力和攻击性行为的影响。
Eur J Psychol. 2021 May 31;17(2):13-27. doi: 10.5964/ejop.2413. eCollection 2021 May.
6
Working memory guidance of visual attention to threat in offenders.工作记忆对罪犯视觉注意威胁的引导。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 7;17(1):e0261882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261882. eCollection 2022.
7
Understanding the mental roots of social perceptions and behaviors: An integrated information-processing perspective.理解社会认知与行为的心理根源:一种综合信息加工视角。
Heliyon. 2021 Feb 3;7(2):e06168. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06168. eCollection 2021 Feb.
8
A Pilot Study for Forgiveness Intervention in Adolescents With High Trait Anger: Enhancing Empathy and Harmony.一项针对高特质愤怒青少年的宽恕干预试点研究:增强同理心与和谐。
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 23;11:569134. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.569134. eCollection 2020.
9
Violence reduces attention to faces and draws attention to points of contact.暴力会减少对人脸的注意力,并将注意力吸引到接触点上。
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 28;9(1):17779. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54327-3.
10
Eye Gaze Patterns Associated with Aggressive Tendencies in Adolescence.与青少年攻击倾向相关的眼球注视模式。
Psychiatr Q. 2018 Sep;89(3):747-756. doi: 10.1007/s11126-018-9573-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Correlation between trait hostility and faster reading times for sentences describing angry reactions to ambiguous situations.特质敌意与阅读描述对模棱两可情况产生愤怒反应的句子的时间之间的相关性。
Cogn Emot. 2005 Mar 1;19(3):463-72. doi: 10.1080/02699930441000229.
2
Selective attention during scene perception: evidence from negative priming.场景感知中的选择性注意:来自负启动效应的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Oct;34(7):1484-94. doi: 10.3758/bf03195913.
3
Turning the other cheek. Agreeableness and the regulation of aggression-related primes.逆来顺受。宜人性与攻击性相关启动因素的调节。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Feb;17(2):136-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01676.x.
4
Attentional allocation during the perception of scenes.场景感知过程中的注意力分配。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Aug;30(4):760-77. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.4.760.
5
Scene consistency in object and background perception.物体与背景感知中的场景一致性。
Psychol Sci. 2004 Aug;15(8):559-64. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00719.x.
6
Relational and physical victimization within friendships: nobody told me there'd be friends like these.友谊中的关系型和身体型受害:没人告诉我会有这样的朋友。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2002 Dec;30(6):599-607. doi: 10.1023/a:1020811714064.
7
Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety?在亚临床焦虑中,威胁性刺激会吸引还是保持视觉注意力?
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Dec;130(4):681-700.
8
Anxiety and attention to threatening pictures.焦虑与对威胁性图片的关注。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2001 Aug;54(3):665-81. doi: 10.1080/713755991.
9
The time course of visual processing: from early perception to decision-making.视觉处理的时间进程:从早期感知到决策制定。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2001 May 15;13(4):454-61. doi: 10.1162/08989290152001880.
10
A three-factor model of trait anger: dimensions of affect, behavior, and cognition.
J Pers. 2000 Oct;68(5):869-97. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00119.

追踪“邪眼”:特质愤怒与模糊敌意场景中的选择性注意

Tracking the Evil Eye: Trait Anger and Selective Attention within Ambiguously Hostile Scenes.

作者信息

Wilkowski Benjamin M, Robinson Michael D, Gordon Robert D, Troop-Gordon Wendy

机构信息

North Dakota State University.

出版信息

J Res Pers. 2007 Jun 1;41(3):650-666. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.07.003.

DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2006.07.003
PMID:24920865
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4049355/
Abstract

Previous research has shown that trait anger is associated with biases in attention and interpretation, but the temporal relation between these two types of biases remains unresolved. Indeed, two very different models can be derived from the literature. One model proposes that interpretation biases emerge from earlier biases in attention, whereas the other model proposes that hostile interpretations occur quickly, even prior to the allocation of attention to specific cues. Within the context of integrated visual scenes of ambiguously intended harm, the two models make opposite predictions that can be examined using an eye-tracking methodology. The present study ( = 45) therefore tracked participants' allocation of attention to hostile and non-hostile cues in ambiguous visual scenes, and found support for the idea that high anger individuals make early hostile interpretations prior to encoding hostile and non-hostiles cues. The data are important in understanding associations between trait anger and cognitive biases.

摘要

先前的研究表明,特质愤怒与注意力和解释方面的偏差有关,但这两种偏差之间的时间关系仍未得到解决。事实上,从文献中可以得出两种截然不同的模型。一种模型认为,解释偏差源于早期的注意力偏差,而另一种模型则认为,即使在将注意力分配到特定线索之前,敌意解释也会迅速出现。在意图含糊的伤害的综合视觉场景背景下,这两种模型做出了相反的预测,可以使用眼动追踪方法进行检验。因此,本研究(N = 45)追踪了参与者在模糊视觉场景中对敌意和非敌意线索的注意力分配,发现有证据支持高愤怒个体在编码敌意和非敌意线索之前就做出早期敌意解释的观点。这些数据对于理解特质愤怒与认知偏差之间的关联很重要。