Wilkowski Benjamin M, Robinson Michael D, Gordon Robert D, Troop-Gordon Wendy
North Dakota State University.
J Res Pers. 2007 Jun 1;41(3):650-666. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.07.003.
Previous research has shown that trait anger is associated with biases in attention and interpretation, but the temporal relation between these two types of biases remains unresolved. Indeed, two very different models can be derived from the literature. One model proposes that interpretation biases emerge from earlier biases in attention, whereas the other model proposes that hostile interpretations occur quickly, even prior to the allocation of attention to specific cues. Within the context of integrated visual scenes of ambiguously intended harm, the two models make opposite predictions that can be examined using an eye-tracking methodology. The present study ( = 45) therefore tracked participants' allocation of attention to hostile and non-hostile cues in ambiguous visual scenes, and found support for the idea that high anger individuals make early hostile interpretations prior to encoding hostile and non-hostiles cues. The data are important in understanding associations between trait anger and cognitive biases.
先前的研究表明,特质愤怒与注意力和解释方面的偏差有关,但这两种偏差之间的时间关系仍未得到解决。事实上,从文献中可以得出两种截然不同的模型。一种模型认为,解释偏差源于早期的注意力偏差,而另一种模型则认为,即使在将注意力分配到特定线索之前,敌意解释也会迅速出现。在意图含糊的伤害的综合视觉场景背景下,这两种模型做出了相反的预测,可以使用眼动追踪方法进行检验。因此,本研究(N = 45)追踪了参与者在模糊视觉场景中对敌意和非敌意线索的注意力分配,发现有证据支持高愤怒个体在编码敌意和非敌意线索之前就做出早期敌意解释的观点。这些数据对于理解特质愤怒与认知偏差之间的关联很重要。