Suppr超能文献

追踪“邪眼”:特质愤怒与模糊敌意场景中的选择性注意

Tracking the Evil Eye: Trait Anger and Selective Attention within Ambiguously Hostile Scenes.

作者信息

Wilkowski Benjamin M, Robinson Michael D, Gordon Robert D, Troop-Gordon Wendy

机构信息

North Dakota State University.

出版信息

J Res Pers. 2007 Jun 1;41(3):650-666. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.07.003.

Abstract

Previous research has shown that trait anger is associated with biases in attention and interpretation, but the temporal relation between these two types of biases remains unresolved. Indeed, two very different models can be derived from the literature. One model proposes that interpretation biases emerge from earlier biases in attention, whereas the other model proposes that hostile interpretations occur quickly, even prior to the allocation of attention to specific cues. Within the context of integrated visual scenes of ambiguously intended harm, the two models make opposite predictions that can be examined using an eye-tracking methodology. The present study ( = 45) therefore tracked participants' allocation of attention to hostile and non-hostile cues in ambiguous visual scenes, and found support for the idea that high anger individuals make early hostile interpretations prior to encoding hostile and non-hostiles cues. The data are important in understanding associations between trait anger and cognitive biases.

摘要

先前的研究表明,特质愤怒与注意力和解释方面的偏差有关,但这两种偏差之间的时间关系仍未得到解决。事实上,从文献中可以得出两种截然不同的模型。一种模型认为,解释偏差源于早期的注意力偏差,而另一种模型则认为,即使在将注意力分配到特定线索之前,敌意解释也会迅速出现。在意图含糊的伤害的综合视觉场景背景下,这两种模型做出了相反的预测,可以使用眼动追踪方法进行检验。因此,本研究(N = 45)追踪了参与者在模糊视觉场景中对敌意和非敌意线索的注意力分配,发现有证据支持高愤怒个体在编码敌意和非敌意线索之前就做出早期敌意解释的观点。这些数据对于理解特质愤怒与认知偏差之间的关联很重要。

相似文献

2
Measuring Hostile Interpretation Bias: The WSAP-Hostility Scale.测量敌意解释偏差:WSAP-敌意量表。
Assessment. 2016 Dec;23(6):707-719. doi: 10.1177/1073191115599052. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
5
Transdiagnostic cognitive processes in high trait anger.高特质愤怒的跨诊断认知过程。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Mar;31(2):193-202. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.10.003. Epub 2010 Oct 31.
6
Hostile interpretation bias in depression.抑郁症中的敌意解释偏差。
J Affect Disord. 2016 Oct;203:9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.05.070. Epub 2016 Jun 1.

引用本文的文献

6
Working memory guidance of visual attention to threat in offenders.工作记忆对罪犯视觉注意威胁的引导。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 7;17(1):e0261882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261882. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

4
Attentional allocation during the perception of scenes.场景感知过程中的注意力分配。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Aug;30(4):760-77. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.4.760.
5
Scene consistency in object and background perception.物体与背景感知中的场景一致性。
Psychol Sci. 2004 Aug;15(8):559-64. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00719.x.
8
Anxiety and attention to threatening pictures.焦虑与对威胁性图片的关注。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2001 Aug;54(3):665-81. doi: 10.1080/713755991.
10
A three-factor model of trait anger: dimensions of affect, behavior, and cognition.
J Pers. 2000 Oct;68(5):869-97. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00119.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验