Yang J, Chen J, Wu X-F, Song N-J, Li Q, Qiao D, Zhang J-Y, Song N-H
Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Andrology. 2014 Sep;2(5):729-33. doi: 10.1111/j.2047-2927.2014.00239.x. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
We conducted this study to investigate whether glans-reconstruction with preputial flap would be more helpful for post-operative restoration of patients' sexual potency than primary closure. From 2007 to 2013 at four centres, 46 cases reconstructed with preputial flap and 59 with primary closure were selected for the investigation from 142 consecutive cases of superficial glans cancer, with the largest diameter of lesion ≤2.5 cm, who undergoing glans-preserving surgery (GPS). Subjective evaluation for patients' sexual performance was investigated using the International Index of Erectile Function-15. Objective evaluation was carried out by the Audio Visual Sexual Stimulation test with RigiScan-Plus. The degree of satisfaction for penile appearance and patients' confidence and partners' acceptability for intercourse were evaluated by 5-point scales. Patients with preputial flap reconstruction showed significant better performance in three domains (orgasmic function, intercourse satisfaction and overall satisfaction, all p < 0.05) and significantly higher ratios of appearance satisfaction (78.3% vs. 57.6%, p = 0.026) and intercourse confidence (69.6% vs. 49.2%, p = 0.035) compared with those undergoing primary closure at post-operative month 6 ends. Their sexual partners in the preputial flap group also exhibited significantly higher ratios of appearance satisfaction than in the primary closure group (67.4% vs. 42.4%, p = 0.011). Reconstruction with preputial flap contributes to a more acceptable cosmetic appearance of the penis and minimizes post-operative negative psychological impediments. Patients can benefit more from reconstruction with preputial flap than primary closure. Glans-reconstruction with preputial flap should be considered the primary reconstruction technique in GPS.
我们开展这项研究,旨在调查与一期缝合相比,采用包皮瓣进行龟头重建是否对患者术后性功能恢复更有帮助。2007年至2013年期间,在四个中心,从142例连续的浅表性龟头癌病例(病变最大直径≤2.5 cm)中,选取46例行包皮瓣重建和59例行一期缝合的病例进行研究,这些患者均接受了保留龟头手术(GPS)。使用国际勃起功能指数-15对患者的性功能进行主观评估。通过RigiScan-Plus视听性刺激测试进行客观评估。采用5分制量表评估阴茎外观的满意度、患者的性交信心以及性伴侣对性交的接受度。在术后6个月末,与一期缝合的患者相比,采用包皮瓣重建的患者在三个方面(性高潮功能、性交满意度和总体满意度,均p<0.05)表现显著更好,外观满意度(78.3%对57.6%,p=0.026)和性交信心(69.6%对49.2%,p=0.035)的比例也显著更高。包皮瓣组患者的性伴侣在外观满意度方面的比例也显著高于一期缝合组(67.4%对42.4%,p=0.011)。采用包皮瓣重建有助于使阴茎外观更易被接受,并将术后负面心理障碍降至最低。与一期缝合相比,患者采用包皮瓣重建能获得更多益处。在保留龟头手术中,应将采用包皮瓣进行龟头重建视为主要的重建技术。