Suppr超能文献

医疗服务提供者对患者及护理人员使用在线健康社区的感知反应。

Perceived healthcare provider reactions to patient and caregiver use of online health communities.

作者信息

Rupert Douglas J, Moultrie Rebecca R, Read Jennifer Gard, Amoozegar Jacqueline B, Bornkessel Alexandra S, O'Donoghue Amie C, Sullivan Helen W

机构信息

Center for Communication Science, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

Center for Communication Science, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Sep;96(3):320-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.015. Epub 2014 May 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Many Internet users seek health information through online health communities (OHCs) and other social media. Yet few studies assess how individuals use peer-generated health information, and many healthcare providers (HCPs) believe OHCs interfere with patient-provider relationships. This study explored how individuals use OHC content in clinical discussions and how HCPs react to it.

METHODS

We conducted in-person and virtual focus groups with patients/caregivers who visited OHCs (n=89). A trained moderator asked about reasons for membership, sharing OHC content with providers, HCP reactions, and preferred roles for HCPs. Two researchers independently coded verbatim transcripts (NVivo 9.2) and conducted thematic response analysis.

RESULTS

Participants described OHCs as supplementing information from HCPs, whom they perceived as too busy for detailed discussions. Almost all participants shared OHC content with HCPs, although only half cited OHCs as the source. Most HCPs reacted negatively to OHC content, making participants feel disempowered. Despite these reactions, participants continued to use OHCs, and most desired HCP feedback on the accuracy of OHC content.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals do not use OHCs to circumvent HCPs but instead to gather more in-depth information.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

HCPs should discuss OHC content with patients to help them avoid misinformation and make more informed decisions.

摘要

目的

许多互联网用户通过在线健康社区(OHC)和其他社交媒体寻求健康信息。然而,很少有研究评估个人如何使用同伴生成的健康信息,而且许多医疗服务提供者(HCP)认为OHC会干扰医患关系。本研究探讨了个人在临床讨论中如何使用OHC内容以及HCP对此的反应。

方法

我们对访问过OHC的患者/护理人员进行了面对面和虚拟焦点小组访谈(n = 89)。一名经过培训的主持人询问了加入OHC的原因、与医疗服务提供者分享OHC内容的情况、HCP的反应以及HCP的理想角色。两名研究人员独立对逐字记录进行编码(NVivo 9.2)并进行主题反应分析。

结果

参与者将OHC描述为对医疗服务提供者提供信息的补充,他们认为医疗服务提供者太忙,无法进行详细讨论。几乎所有参与者都与医疗服务提供者分享了OHC内容,尽管只有一半的人将OHC作为信息来源。大多数医疗服务提供者对OHC内容反应消极,这让参与者感到无力。尽管有这些反应,参与者仍继续使用OHC,并且大多数人希望医疗服务提供者对OHC内容的准确性提供反馈。

结论

个人使用OHC并非为了绕过医疗服务提供者,而是为了收集更深入的信息。

实践意义

医疗服务提供者应与患者讨论OHC内容,以帮助他们避免错误信息并做出更明智的决定。

相似文献

8
Personas in online health communities.在线健康社区中的用户角色。
J Biomed Inform. 2016 Oct;63:212-225. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.08.019. Epub 2016 Aug 26.

引用本文的文献

6
The emotional side of taking part in a cancer clinical trial.参与癌症临床试验的情感层面。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 24;18(4):e0284268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284268. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

2
Preliminary benefits of information therapy.信息疗法的初步益处。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2011 Jan 1;2(1):45-8. doi: 10.1177/2150131910385005.
4
Digital social networks and health.数字社交网络与健康。
Circulation. 2013 Apr 30;127(17):1829-36. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000897.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验