Suppr超能文献

在荷兰一家普通牙科诊所针对6岁儿童开展的一项为期三年的龋齿预防策略随机对照试验。

A three-year randomized controlled trial in 6-year-old children on caries-preventive strategies in a general dental practice in the Netherlands.

作者信息

Vermaire J H, Poorterman J H G, van Herwijnen L, van Loveren C

机构信息

TNO Life Style - Behavioral and Societal Sciences, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Caries Res. 2014;48(6):524-33. doi: 10.1159/000358342. Epub 2014 Jun 11.

Abstract

A parallel-randomized controlled trial on caries-preventive strategies was conducted in a general dental practice with a mixed socioeconomic background patient population. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that, compared to regular care consisting of check-ups twice a year with professional fluoride applications and pit and fissure sealants in all permanent molars, a larger caries-preventive effect can be achieved by following a non-operative caries treatment and prevention (NOCTP) strategy or by following, in addition to regular care, an increased number of professional topical fluoride applications (IPFA). A total of 230 children (6.0 years ± 3 months of age) were randomly assigned to the two experimental groups or the control group. After 3 years, 179 participants remained in the study (54 NOCTP, 62 IPFA and 63 control). The children were examined at baseline and at 3 years by the same experienced examiner, who was blinded for the allocation of the children. Caries was scored clinically at the D3 level. Per protocol analysis revealed a mean DMFS increment after 3 years of 0.15 (95% CI -0.05 to 0.35) for NOCTP, 0.34 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.54) for IPFA and 0.47 (95% CI 0.26 to 0.68) for the control group. To account for missing data, multiple imputation was used, after which the mean DMFS increment was 0.11 (95% CI -0.05 to 0.27) for NOCTP, 0.29 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.46) for IPFA and 0.40 (95% CI 0.21 to 0.55) for the control group. Testing the differences with independent samples t test revealed a lower caries increment in the NOCTP group compared to the control group. ANCOVA was used to correct for differences in baseline dmfs, socioeconomic status and perceived dental hygiene burden. The ΔDMFS effect size between the NOCTP and the control group dropped, losing statistical significance (p = 0.06). Although the results in this study are promising, it has yet to be established in a larger study whether NOCTP has the ability to be effective in regular dental practice with a mixed socioeconomic status population.

摘要

在一家拥有社会经济背景各异患者群体的普通牙科诊所进行了一项关于龋齿预防策略的平行随机对照试验。本研究的目的是检验以下假设:与每年进行两次检查并对所有恒牙进行专业氟化物应用和窝沟封闭的常规护理相比,采用非手术性龋齿治疗与预防(NOCTP)策略或除常规护理外增加专业局部用氟次数(IPFA)可取得更大的龋齿预防效果。总共230名儿童(6.0岁±3个月)被随机分配到两个实验组或对照组。3年后,179名参与者仍留在研究中(54名接受NOCTP,62名接受IPFA,63名作为对照)。在基线和3年后由同一位经验丰富的检查者对儿童进行检查,该检查者对儿童的分组情况不知情。临床在D3水平对龋齿进行评分。按照方案分析显示,3年后NOCTP组的平均DMFS增量为0.15(95%CI -0.05至0.35),IPFA组为0.34(95%CI 0.11至0.54),对照组为0.47(95%CI 0.26至0.68)。为处理缺失数据,采用了多重填补法,之后NOCTP组的平均DMFS增量为0.11(95%CI -0.05至0.27),IPFA组为0.29(95%CI 0.11至0.46),对照组为0.40(95%CI 0.21至0.55)。用独立样本t检验对差异进行检验,结果显示NOCTP组的龋齿增量低于对照组。采用协方差分析校正基线dmfs、社会经济状况和感知的口腔卫生负担方面的差异。NOCTP组与对照组之间的ΔDMFS效应量下降,失去统计学意义(p = 0.06)。尽管本研究结果很有前景,但在规模更大的研究中NOCTP在社会经济状况各异的人群的常规牙科实践中是否有效还有待确定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验