• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项考察公园更新对弱势社区公园使用情况及基于公园的身体活动影响的自然实验:REVAMP研究方法

A natural experiment to examine the impact of park renewal on park-use and park-based physical activity in a disadvantaged neighbourhood: the REVAMP study methods.

作者信息

Veitch Jenny, Salmon Jo, Carver Alison, Timperio Anna, Crawford David, Fletcher Elly, Giles-Corti Billie

机构信息

Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2014 Jun 13;14:600. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-600.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-14-600
PMID:24924919
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4073813/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Modifying the built environment by improving parks is potentially a sustainable way to increase population level physical activity. Despite considerable investment in parks and park renovations, few natural experiments on the impact of improving amenities on park use and park-based physical activity have been conducted. REVAMP is a natural experiment that aims to examine whether park improvement increases overall park usage, park-based physical activity and active travel to and from the park in the intervention compared with the control park over a two-year period; and to identify which specific aspects of the park refurbishment attracts park visitors and encourages park users to be more active. This paper describes the methods of the REVAMP study.

METHODS

The intervention park is a large regional park (329 hectares) located in a low socio-economic status (SES) area in the north-eastern suburbs of Melbourne, Australia. The control park is a regional park (120 hectares) located in a high SES area in the eastern suburbs of Melbourne. Multiple methodologies to evaluate the impact of the park renovation are being employed including: cross-sectional surveys of local residents living near the two parks, direct observations of park users, intercept surveys with park users, and electronic monitoring of path usage and car traffic within the parks. Baseline measures were conducted in April-May 2013 (T1), and an innovative play space suitable for children of all ages and abilities was installed at the intervention park between September 2013 and February 2014. Follow-up measures will be repeated in April-May 2014 (T2) and April-May 2015 (T3). All methodologies will be completed at both the intervention and control parks at all three time-points, with the exception of the cross-sectional survey of local residents which will only be conducted at T1 and T3.

CONCLUSION

This research will inform future park developments, and will contribute to creating an evidence base of the impact of park refurbishment, and the development of natural experiment methodology.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current controlled trial ISRCTN50745547, registration date 11.1.2014.

摘要

背景

通过改善公园来改变建成环境可能是一种增加人群身体活动水平的可持续方式。尽管在公园及公园翻新方面投入了大量资金,但针对改善设施对公园使用及基于公园的身体活动的影响所开展的自然实验却很少。“改造公园”(REVAMP)是一项自然实验,旨在研究与对照公园相比,在两年时间内,干预公园的改善措施是否会增加公园的总体使用率、基于公园的身体活动以及往返公园的主动出行;并确定公园翻新的哪些具体方面吸引了公园游客并促使公园使用者更加活跃。本文描述了“改造公园”研究的方法。

方法

干预公园是位于澳大利亚墨尔本东北部郊区一个社会经济地位较低(SES)地区的大型区域公园(329公顷)。对照公园是位于墨尔本东郊一个高SES地区的区域公园(120公顷)。正在采用多种方法来评估公园翻新的影响,包括:对两个公园附近当地居民的横断面调查、对公园使用者的直接观察、对公园使用者的拦截式调查以及对公园内路径使用和汽车交通的电子监测。基线测量于2013年4月至5月进行(T1),2013年9月至2014年2月期间在干预公园安装了一个适合各年龄和能力儿童的创新游乐空间。后续测量将在2014年4月至5月(T2)和2015年4月至5月(T3)重复进行。除了仅在T1和T3进行的当地居民横断面调查外,所有方法将在三个时间点的干预公园和对照公园都完成。

结论

本研究将为未来的公园发展提供信息,并将有助于建立公园翻新影响的证据基础以及自然实验方法的发展。

试验注册

当前对照试验ISRCTN50745547,注册日期2014年1月11日。

相似文献

1
A natural experiment to examine the impact of park renewal on park-use and park-based physical activity in a disadvantaged neighbourhood: the REVAMP study methods.一项考察公园更新对弱势社区公园使用情况及基于公园的身体活动影响的自然实验:REVAMP研究方法
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jun 13;14:600. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-600.
2
The REVAMP natural experiment study: the impact of a play-scape installation on park visitation and park-based physical activity.REVAMP 自然实验研究:游乐场景观装置对公园使用和基于公园的身体活动的影响。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Jan 25;15(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0625-5.
3
How active are people in metropolitan parks? An observational study of park visitation in Australia.人们在城市公园中的活动情况如何?澳大利亚公园游客量的一项观察性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 4;15:610. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1960-6.
4
Challenges in conducting natural experiments in parks-lessons from the REVAMP study.在公园开展自然实验的挑战——来自REVAMP研究的经验教训
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Jan 17;14(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0460-0.
5
Study protocol for a natural experiment in a lower socioeconomic area to examine the health-related effects of refurbishment to parks including built-shade (ShadePlus).自然实验研究方案,在一个较低社会经济地区,研究公园翻新(包括增设荫棚)对健康的影响,包括荫棚的影响。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 22;7(2):e013493. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013493.
6
Park improvements and park activity: a natural experiment.公园改善与公园活动:一项自然实验。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Jun;42(6):616-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.015.
7
Examining Health-Related Effects of Refurbishment to Parks in a Lower Socioeconomic Area: The ShadePlus Natural Experiment.检查翻新位于较低社会经济区公园对健康的影响:ShadePlus 自然实验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 21;17(17):6102. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176102.
8
Impact of park renovations on park use and park-based physical activity.公园翻新对公园使用情况及基于公园的体育活动的影响。
J Phys Act Health. 2015 Feb;12(2):289-95. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2013-0165. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
9
Understanding the impact of the installation of outdoor fitness equipment and a multi-sports court on park visitation and park-based physical activity: A natural experiment.了解安装户外健身器材和多用途球场对公园使用和基于公园的身体活动的影响:一项自然实验。
Health Place. 2021 Sep;71:102662. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102662. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
10
Physical activity patterns in urban neighbourhood parks: insights from a multiple case study.城市社区公园中的身体活动模式:多案例研究的见解
BMC Public Health. 2014 Sep 17;14:962. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-962.

引用本文的文献

1
Citywide park renovations and changes in perceived stress: a quasi-experimental study among low-income communities in New York City.全市公园翻新与感知压力的变化:一项针对纽约市低收入社区的准实验研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 19;25(1):2515. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23639-7.
2
Park use patterns and park satisfaction before and after citywide park renovations in low-income New York City neighborhoods.纽约市低收入社区全市公园翻新前后的公园使用模式与公园满意度
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23036. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07264-3.
3
Influence of park visitation on physical activity, well-being and social connectedness among Australians during COVID-19.新冠疫情期间公园游览对澳大利亚人身体活动、幸福感和社会联系的影响。
Health Promot Int. 2024 Oct 1;39(5). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae137.
4
Associations of Park Use with Physical Activity in Renovated Parks Serving Low-Income Communities in New York City: Insights from the Community Parks Initiative.纽约市为低收入社区翻新的公园中公园使用与身体活动的关联:社区公园倡议的见解
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Aug 23. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-02095-w.
5
The ENJOY Seniors Exercise Park IMP-ACT project: IMProving older people's health through physical ACTivity: a hybrid II implementation design study protocol.“享受老年人运动公园IMP-ACT项目”:通过体育活动改善老年人健康:一项混合II型实施设计研究方案
Arch Public Health. 2024 Mar 26;82(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01262-z.
6
Observation-based data-gathering method to support the assessment of the use of cultural ecosystem services in urban green spaces.基于观察的数据收集方法,以支持对城市绿地文化生态系统服务利用情况的评估。
MethodsX. 2023 Aug 15;11:102326. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102326. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
Using automated active infrared counters to estimate footfall on urban park footpaths: behavioural stability and validity testing.利用自动化主动红外计数器估算城市公园步道上的人流量:行为稳定性和有效性测试。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Apr 25;20(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01438-w.
8
The association of park use and park perception with quality of life using structural equation modeling.利用结构方程模型研究公园使用和公园感知与生活质量的关系。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 25;11:1038288. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1038288. eCollection 2023.
9
The ENJOY MAP for HEALTH: Exercise interveNtion outdoor proJect in the cOmmunitY for older people-More Active People for HEALTHier communities: a study protocol.《健康之愉悦图:老年人社区外运动干预项目——让更多的人更积极,让社区更健康:研究方案》。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 21;22(1):1027. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13335-1.
10
Neighbourhood, Built Environment and Children's Outdoor Play Spaces in Urban Ghana: Review of Policies and Challenges.加纳城市中的邻里、建成环境与儿童户外游乐空间:政策与挑战综述
Landsc Urban Plan. 2021 Nov 5;218:104288. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104288. eCollection 2022 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Physical activity and the rejuvenation of Connswater (PARC study): protocol for a natural experiment investigating the impact of urban regeneration on public health.体力活动与康斯沃特河复兴(PARC研究):一项调查城市更新对公众健康影响的自然实验方案
BMC Public Health. 2013 Aug 23;13:774. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-774.
2
Does playground improvement increase physical activity among children? A quasi-experimental study of a natural experiment.操场改善是否能增加儿童的身体活动量?一项自然实验的准实验研究。
J Environ Public Health. 2013;2013:109841. doi: 10.1155/2013/109841. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
3
Perceptions of neighborhood park quality: associations with physical activity and body mass index.邻里公园质量感知:与身体活动和身体质量指数的关联。
Ann Behav Med. 2013 Feb;45 Suppl 1:S39-48. doi: 10.1007/s12160-012-9448-4.
4
The influence of urban design on neighbourhood walking following residential relocation: longitudinal results from the RESIDE study.城市设计对居住迁移后邻里步行的影响:来自 RESIDE 研究的纵向结果。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Jan;77:20-30. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.10.016. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
5
Is physical activity in natural environments better for mental health than physical activity in other environments?在自然环境中进行身体活动比在其他环境中进行身体活动对心理健康更有益吗?
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Aug;91:130-4. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.04.012. Epub 2012 May 8.
6
Community-engaged interventions on diet, activity, and weight outcomes in U.S. schools: a systematic review.美国学校中关于饮食、活动和体重的社区参与干预措施:系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Jul;43(1):81-91. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.031.
7
Park improvements and park activity: a natural experiment.公园改善与公园活动:一项自然实验。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Jun;42(6):616-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.015.
8
Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: new Medical Research Council guidance.利用自然实验评估人群健康干预措施:英国医学研究理事会新指南。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Dec;66(12):1182-6. doi: 10.1136/jech-2011-200375. Epub 2012 May 10.
9
Evaluating the travel, physical activity and carbon impacts of a 'natural experiment' in the provision of new walking and cycling infrastructure: methods for the core module of the iConnect study.评估在提供新的步行和自行车基础设施方面一项“自然实验”的出行、身体活动及碳影响:iConnect研究核心模块的方法
BMJ Open. 2012 Feb 2;2(1):e000694. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000694. Print 2012.
10
Impact and cost-effectiveness of family Fitness Zones: a natural experiment in urban public parks.家庭健身区的影响和成本效益:城市公园中的自然实验。
Health Place. 2012 Jan;18(1):39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.09.008.