• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经重症监护病房高血糖患者的血糖最佳目标范围

Optimal target range for blood glucose in hyperglycaemic patients in a neurocritical care unit.

作者信息

Guo Yi-Jing, Zhou Yi, Zhang Sheng-Yi, Wei Qiong, Huang Yan, Xia Wen-Qing, Wang Shao-Hua

机构信息

Department of Neurology, The Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing, P.R. China.

Department of Endocrinology, The Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing, P.R. China.

出版信息

Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2014 Sep;11(5):352-8. doi: 10.1177/1479164114530580. Epub 2014 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1177/1479164114530580
PMID:24925103
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hyperglycaemia is common among patients with critical neurological injury, even if they have no history of diabetes. The optimal target range for normalizing their blood glucose is unknown.

METHODS

Retrospective data were extracted from 890 hyperglycaemic individuals (glucose > 200 mg/dL) admitted to neuroscience critical care unit (NCCU) and these patients were divided into two groups: intensive glucose control group with target glucose of < 140 mg/dL achieved and moderate control with glucose levels 140-180 mg/dL. The groups were also stratified according to the hyperglycaemia type (pre-existing diabetes or stress-related). We defined the primary endpoint as death from any cause during NCCU admission.

RESULTS

In NCCU, tighter control of blood glucose at ≤ 140 mg/dL was associated with increased, mortality of individuals with pre-existing diabetes compared with moderate control [29 of 310 patients (9.4%) vs 15 of 304 patients (4.9%), p = 0.034]. Patient age [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.12; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.05-1.19; p < 0.001], level of glycated haemoglobin (adjusted OR = 1.24; 95% CI = 1.04-1.48; p = 0.017) and hypoglycaemia (adjusted OR = 10.3; 95% CI = 2.92-36.6; p < 0.001) were positively associated with higher mortality. Death rate was lower among stress-related hyperglycaemic patients with tighter glucose controlled at ≤ 140 mg/dL [6 of 140 patients (4.3%) vs 15 of 136 patients (11.0%), p = 0.035].

CONCLUSION

A differential association is evident between glucose levels and mortality in diabetes and stress-related hyperglycaemia patients. However, given the observational nature of our work, no clinical recommendations can be given and prospective studies are required to further investigate these findings.

摘要

背景

高血糖在重症神经损伤患者中很常见,即便他们没有糖尿病史。血糖正常化的最佳目标范围尚不清楚。

方法

从890名入住神经科学重症监护病房(NCCU)的高血糖患者(血糖>200mg/dL)中提取回顾性数据,这些患者被分为两组:血糖目标值<140mg/dL的强化血糖控制组和血糖水平为140 - 180mg/dL的适度控制组。这些组还根据高血糖类型(既往糖尿病或应激相关)进行分层。我们将主要终点定义为NCCU住院期间任何原因导致的死亡。

结果

在NCCU中,与适度控制相比,将血糖严格控制在≤140mg/dL与既往有糖尿病的患者死亡率增加相关[310例患者中有29例(9.4%),304例患者中有15例(4.9%),p = 0.034]。患者年龄[调整后的比值比(OR)= 1.12;95%置信区间(CI)= 1.05 - 1.19;p < 0.001]、糖化血红蛋白水平(调整后的OR = 1.24;95%CI = 1.04 - 1.48;p = 0.017)和低血糖(调整后的OR = 10.3;95%CI = 2.92 - 36.6;p < 0.001)与较高的死亡率呈正相关。在应激相关高血糖患者中,血糖严格控制在≤140mg/dL时死亡率较低[140例患者中有6例(4.3%),136例患者中有15例(11.0%),p = 0.035]。

结论

糖尿病患者和应激相关高血糖患者的血糖水平与死亡率之间存在明显的差异关联。然而,鉴于我们研究的观察性质,无法给出临床建议,需要进行前瞻性研究以进一步调查这些发现。

相似文献

1
Optimal target range for blood glucose in hyperglycaemic patients in a neurocritical care unit.神经重症监护病房高血糖患者的血糖最佳目标范围
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2014 Sep;11(5):352-8. doi: 10.1177/1479164114530580. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
2
Hyperglycemia as a predictor of in-hospital mortality in elderly patients without diabetes mellitus admitted to a sub-intensive care unit.高血糖作为入住亚重症监护病房的非糖尿病老年患者院内死亡的预测指标。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Jun;56(6):1106-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01729.x. Epub 2008 May 12.
3
Is blood glucose on admission a predictor of mortality in adult acute pneumonia?入院时的血糖水平是成人急性肺炎死亡率的预测指标吗?
Clin Respir J. 2013 Jul;7(3):276-80. doi: 10.1111/crj.12003. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
4
In-hospital peak glycemia and prognosis in STEMI patients without earlier known diabetes.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者(既往无糖尿病史)住院期间血糖峰值与预后
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010 Aug;17(4):419-23. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328335f26f.
5
Blood glucose concentration and outcome of critical illness: the impact of diabetes.血糖浓度与危重病结局:糖尿病的影响
Crit Care Med. 2008 Aug;36(8):2249-55. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318181039a.
6
Consensus recommendations for the management of hyperglycaemia in critically ill patients in the Indian setting.印度环境下危重症患者高血糖管理的共识性建议。
J Assoc Physicians India. 2014 Jul;62(7 Suppl):16-25.
7
[Blood glucose levels in the first 24 hours of admission is not a risk factor for mortality in critical care patients].入院后首24小时的血糖水平并非危重症患者死亡的危险因素。
Nutr Hosp. 2011 May-Jun;26(3):622-35. doi: 10.1590/S0212-16112011000300028.
8
Surgical Care Improvement Project measure for postoperative glucose control should not be used as a measure of quality after cardiac surgery.外科手术护理改进项目(Surgical Care Improvement Project)的术后血糖控制措施不应用于心脏手术后的质量衡量标准。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Mar;147(3):1041-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.11.028. Epub 2014 Jan 11.
9
Initial management of septic patients with hyperglycemia in the noncritical care inpatient setting.非重症监护住院环境中伴有高血糖的脓毒症患者的初始治疗。
Am J Med. 2012 Jul;125(7):670-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 May 19.
10
Validation of an insulin infusion nomogram for intensive glucose control in critically ill patients.用于重症患者强化血糖控制的胰岛素输注诺模图的验证
Pharmacotherapy. 2005 Mar;25(3):352-9. doi: 10.1592/phco.25.3.352.61594.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Fat-based versus Carbohydrate-based Enteral Feeding on Glycemic Control in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.基于脂肪与基于碳水化合物的肠内营养对危重症患者血糖控制的影响:一项随机临床试验
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2017 Aug;21(8):500-505. doi: 10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_118_17.
2
The initial hyperglycemia in acute type II pyrethroid poisoning.急性II型拟除虫菊酯中毒时的初始高血糖症。
J Korean Med Sci. 2015 Apr;30(4):365-70. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.4.365. Epub 2015 Mar 19.