Harper D N
School of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand.
Behav Processes. 1999 May 3;46(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/S0376-6357(98)00056-4.
Using a procedure to assess behavioral resistance to change, the effects of two drugs (haloperidol and clozapine) were compared to each other and to the effect of response-independent food delivered between multiple-schedule components. Using rats as subjects, responding in one component was maintained on a variable-interval 30-s schedule, whereas responding in another component was maintained on a variable-interval 30-s schedule that operated concurrently with a variable-time 30-s schedule. Consistent with previous findings, responding in the component with the greater overall amount of reinforcement displayed the greater resistance to response-independent food delivery. Similarly, increasing the dose of haloperidol or clozapine increased the overall extent of disruption (relative to baseline levels), with the greatest disruption occurring to responding in the component associated with the smaller overall amount of food reinforcement. Thus, as with the disruption caused by alterations in reinforcement conditions, the extent of disruption to reinforced responding caused by haloperidol and clozapine is specifically dependent upon baseline reinforcement conditions rather than baseline response rates.
运用一种评估行为对变化的抵抗力的程序,比较了两种药物(氟哌啶醇和氯氮平)的效果,并将其与在多重时间表成分之间给予的与反应无关的食物的效果进行了比较。以大鼠为实验对象,一个成分中的反应通过可变间隔30秒的时间表维持,而另一个成分中的反应通过与可变时间30秒时间表同时运行的可变间隔30秒时间表维持。与先前的研究结果一致,在强化总量较大的成分中的反应对与反应无关的食物投放表现出更大的抵抗力。同样,增加氟哌啶醇或氯氮平的剂量会增加干扰的总体程度(相对于基线水平),对与食物强化总量较小的成分中的反应干扰最大。因此,与强化条件改变引起的干扰一样,氟哌啶醇和氯氮平对强化反应的干扰程度具体取决于基线强化条件,而不是基线反应率。