Spealman R D, Katz J L, Witkin J M
J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Sep;30(2):187-96. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-187.
The effects of pentobarbital and d-amphetamine were assessed on key pecking by pigeons under conventional single-key multiple schedules and under two-key multiple schedules in which discriminative stimuli appeared on one key (stimulus key) while pecks on a second key (constant key) produced food. Pecks on the stimulus key had no scheduled consequences. A 60-second variable-interval schedule operated in one component of each multiple schedule: either extinction or a 60-second variable-time schedule operated in the alternate component. When the alternate-component schedule was extinction, a high rate of responding was maintained in the variable-interval component of the single-key schedule; responding on both keys was maintained in the variable-interval component of the two-key schedule. Pentobarbital increased responding in the variable-interval component of the single-key schedule and increased stimulus-key, but not constant-key responding in that component of the two-key schedule. When the alternate-component schedule was changed to variable time, responding declined in the variable-interval component of the single-key schedule; stimulus-key responding was no longer maintained under the two-key schedule. Pentobarbital decreased responding in the variable-interval component of both schedules. With an exception, d-amphetamine only decreased responding in the variable-interval component of the single- and two-key schedules both when the alternate-component schedule was extinction and when it was variable time. The results suggest that the effects of pentobarbital, but not d-amphetamine, depend on the nature of the contingency (stimulus-reinforcer, response-reinforcer) that maintains responding.
在传统的单键多重时间表以及双键多重时间表下,评估了戊巴比妥和右旋苯丙胺对鸽子啄键行为的影响。在双键多重时间表中,辨别性刺激出现在一个键(刺激键)上,而对另一个键(固定键)的啄击产生食物。对刺激键的啄击没有预定的结果。在每个多重时间表的一个组成部分中采用了60秒的可变间隔时间表:在交替组成部分中,要么是消退,要么是60秒的可变时距时间表。当交替组成部分的时间表是消退时,单键时间表的可变间隔组成部分维持了较高的反应率;在双键时间表的可变间隔组成部分中,两个键上的反应都得到了维持。戊巴比妥增加了单键时间表可变间隔组成部分的反应,并增加了双键时间表该组成部分中刺激键的反应,但没有增加固定键的反应。当交替组成部分的时间表改为可变时距时,单键时间表可变间隔组成部分的反应下降;在双键时间表下,刺激键的反应不再维持。戊巴比妥降低了两个时间表可变间隔组成部分的反应。除了一个例外,无论交替组成部分的时间表是消退还是可变时距,右旋苯丙胺都只降低了单键和双键时间表可变间隔组成部分的反应。结果表明,戊巴比妥的作用,而非右旋苯丙胺的作用,取决于维持反应的偶然性(刺激-强化物、反应-强化物)的性质。