• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子协作:利用质量改进协作在澳大利亚初级医疗实践中实施国家电子健康记录系统。

The eCollaborative: using a quality improvement collaborative to implement the National eHealth Record System in Australian primary care practices.

作者信息

Knight Andrew W, Szucs Craig, Dhillon Mia, Lembke Tony, Mitchell Chris

机构信息

University of NSW, Fairfield, NSW, Australia The Improvement Foundation, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

National eHealth Transition Authority, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Aug;26(4):411-7. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu059. Epub 2014 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzu059
PMID:24925685
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4126615/
Abstract

QUALITY PROBLEM

The new national patient-controlled electronic health record is an important quality improvement, and there was a pressing need to pilot its use in Australian primary care practices. Implementation of electronic health records in other countries has met with mixed success.

INITIAL ASSESSMENT

New work was required in general practices participating in the national electronic health record. National implementers needed to engage with small private general practices to test the changes before general introduction.

CHOICE OF SOLUTION

The National E-health Transition Authority contracted the Improvement Foundation Australia to conduct a quality improvement collaborative based on 9 years of experience with the Australian Primary Care Collaborative Program.

IMPLEMENTATION

Aims, measures and change ideas were addressed in a collaborative programme of workshops and supported activity periods. Data quality measures and numbers of health summaries uploaded were collected monthly. Challenges such as the delay in implementation of the electronic health summary were met.

EVALUATION

Fifty-six practices participated. Nine hundred and twenty-nine patients registered to participate, and 650 shared health summaries were uploaded. Five hundred and nineteen patient views occurred. Four hundred and twenty-one plan/do/study/act cycles were submitted by participating practices.

LESSONS LEARNED

The collaborative methodology was adapted for implementing innovation and proved useful for engaging with multiple small practices, facilitating low-risk testing of processes, sharing ideas among participants, development of clinical champions and development of resources to support wider use. Email discussion between participants and system designers facilitated improvements. Data quality was a key challenge for this innovation, and quality measures chosen require development. Patient participants were partners in improvement.

摘要

质量问题

新的全国患者自控电子健康记录是一项重要的质量改进措施,迫切需要在澳大利亚基层医疗实践中进行试点使用。电子健康记录在其他国家的实施成效不一。

初步评估

参与全国电子健康记录的基层医疗实践需要开展新的工作。国家实施者需要与小型私人基层医疗实践合作,在全面推广之前测试这些变化。

解决方案选择

国家电子健康转型管理局与澳大利亚改进基金会签约,基于其在澳大利亚基层医疗合作项目9年的经验开展一项质量改进合作项目。

实施

在一系列协作式研讨会及配套活动期间讨论了目标、措施和变革想法。每月收集数据质量指标以及上传的健康总结数量。应对了诸如电子健康总结实施延迟等挑战。

评估

56家医疗实践参与其中。929名患者登记参与,上传了650份共享健康总结。收集到519条患者意见。参与的医疗实践提交了421个计划/执行/研究/行动循环。

经验教训

协作方法适用于实施创新,事实证明有助于与多个小型医疗实践合作,促进流程的低风险测试,在参与者之间分享想法,培养临床倡导者以及开发支持更广泛使用的资源。参与者与系统设计师之间的电子邮件讨论推动了改进。数据质量是这项创新的关键挑战,所选的质量指标需要进一步完善。患者参与者是改进工作的合作伙伴。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e52/4126615/c83020829530/mzu05904.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e52/4126615/44676a6c1d71/mzu05901.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e52/4126615/405e162b5d99/mzu05902.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e52/4126615/471ee8c62b05/mzu05903.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e52/4126615/c83020829530/mzu05904.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e52/4126615/44676a6c1d71/mzu05901.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e52/4126615/405e162b5d99/mzu05902.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e52/4126615/471ee8c62b05/mzu05903.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e52/4126615/c83020829530/mzu05904.jpg

相似文献

1
The eCollaborative: using a quality improvement collaborative to implement the National eHealth Record System in Australian primary care practices.电子协作:利用质量改进协作在澳大利亚初级医疗实践中实施国家电子健康记录系统。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Aug;26(4):411-7. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu059. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
2
Improving primary care in Australia through the Australian Primary Care Collaboratives Program: a quality improvement report.通过澳大利亚初级保健合作计划改善澳大利亚的初级保健:质量改进报告。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Nov;21(11):948-55. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000165. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
3
The design and conduct of Project RedDE: A cluster-randomized trial to reduce diagnostic errors in pediatric primary care.“红色DE项目”的设计与实施:一项旨在减少儿科初级保健中诊断错误的整群随机试验。
Clin Trials. 2019 Apr;16(2):154-164. doi: 10.1177/1740774518820522. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
4
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
5
Informing implementation of quality improvement in Australian primary care.为澳大利亚初级医疗保健中的质量改进实施提供信息。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 16;18(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3099-5.
6
The Australian Primary Care Collaboratives Program: improving diabetes care.澳大利亚基层医疗协作计划:改善糖尿病护理。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Nov;21(11):956-63. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000460. Epub 2012 Jun 16.
7
Improving the identification and management of chronic kidney disease in primary care: lessons from a staged improvement collaborative.改善基层医疗中慢性肾脏病的识别与管理:来自阶段性改善协作项目的经验教训
Int J Qual Health Care. 2015 Feb;27(1):10-6. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu097. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
8
Triple Aim Is Triply Tough: Can You Focus on Three Things at Once?三重目标极具挑战性:你能一心三用吗?
Fam Med. 2018 Mar;50(3):179-187. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2018.885946.
9
Effectiveness of local support for the adoption of a national programme--a descriptive study.地方支持对国家项目采用的有效性——一项描述性研究。
Inform Prim Care. 2014;21(4):171-8. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v21i4.70.
10
The Harvard Medical School Academic Innovations Collaborative: transforming primary care practice and education.哈佛医学院学术创新协作组织:转变初级保健实践和教育。
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1239-44. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000410.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges for Data Quality in the Clinical Data Life Cycle: Systematic Review.临床数据生命周期中数据质量面临的挑战:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 23;27:e60709. doi: 10.2196/60709.
2
25 Years of Electronic Health Record Implementation Processes: Scoping Review.电子健康记录实施流程25年:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 3;27:e60077. doi: 10.2196/60077.
3
Digital health implementation in Australia: A scientometric review of the research.澳大利亚数字健康的实施:一项关于该研究的科学计量学综述。

本文引用的文献

1
Improving primary care in Australia through the Australian Primary Care Collaboratives Program: a quality improvement report.通过澳大利亚初级保健合作计划改善澳大利亚的初级保健:质量改进报告。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Nov;21(11):948-55. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000165. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
2
The Australian Primary Care Collaboratives Program: improving diabetes care.澳大利亚基层医疗协作计划:改善糖尿病护理。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Nov;21(11):956-63. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000460. Epub 2012 Jun 16.
3
How patients use access to their electronic GP record--a quantitative study.
Digit Health. 2024 Nov 13;10:20552076241297729. doi: 10.1177/20552076241297729. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
Data Quality-Driven Improvement in Health Care: Systematic Literature Review.数据驱动的医疗质量改进:系统文献回顾。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 22;26:e57615. doi: 10.2196/57615.
5
The role of clinical champions in facilitating the use of evidence-based practice in drug and alcohol and mental health settings: A systematic review.临床倡导者在促进药物滥用、酒精及心理健康领域循证实践应用中的作用:一项系统综述
Implement Res Pract. 2020 Oct 7;1:2633489520959072. doi: 10.1177/2633489520959072. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
6
It is time to reinvest in quality improvement collaboratives to support Australian general practice.现在是时候重新投资于质量改进合作项目,以支持澳大利亚的全科医疗了。
Med J Aust. 2022 May 16;216(9):438-440. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51502. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
7
A quality improvement collaborative to build improvement capacity in regional primary care support organisations.一个旨在提高地区初级保健支持组织改进能力的质量改进协作项目。
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Jul 17;8(3):e000684. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000684. eCollection 2019.
8
Linking observational data from general practice, hospital admissions and diabetes clinic databases: can it be used to predict hospital admission?将一般实践、住院和糖尿病诊所数据库中的观察数据联系起来:可以用来预测住院吗?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 29;19(1):526. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4337-1.
9
[Application of the Evidence-based Practice for Improving Quality method in neonatal intensive care units].[循证实践促进质量方法在新生儿重症监护病房的应用]
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Aug;20(8):686-690. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2018.08.016.
10
MyHealthRecord in Australian Primary Health Care: An Attitudinal Evaluation Study.澳大利亚初级卫生保健中的我的健康记录:一项态度评估研究。
J Med Syst. 2017 Sep 2;41(10):158. doi: 10.1007/s10916-017-0807-3.
患者如何使用其电子 GP 记录——一项定量研究。
Fam Pract. 2011 Apr;28(2):188-94. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmq092. Epub 2010 Nov 17.
4
The Australian Primary Care Collaboratives: an Australian general practice success story.澳大利亚初级保健协作组织:澳大利亚全科医疗的成功典范。
Med J Aust. 2010 Jul 19;193(2):90-1. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03809.x.
5
How patients use access to their full health records: a qualitative study of patients in general practice.患者如何使用其完整健康记录:一般实践中患者的定性研究。
J R Soc Med. 2009 Dec;102(12):539-44. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2009.090328.
6
The Kaiser Permanente Electronic Health Record: transforming and streamlining modalities of care.凯萨永久电子健康记录:改变和简化医疗模式。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Mar-Apr;28(2):323-33. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.323.
7
Effect of the implementation of an enterprise-wide Electronic Health Record on productivity in the Veterans Health Administration.企业范围内电子健康记录的实施对退伍军人健康管理局生产力的影响。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2006 Apr;1(Pt 2):163-9. doi: 10.1017/S1744133105001210.
8
Evidence for the impact of quality improvement collaboratives: systematic review.质量改进协作影响的证据:系统评价
BMJ. 2008 Jun 28;336(7659):1491-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39570.749884.BE. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
9
Parent-held child health records do not improve care: a randomized controlled trial in Norway.父母持有的儿童健康记录并不能改善医疗服务:挪威的一项随机对照试验。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2006 Sep;24(3):186-90. doi: 10.1080/02813430600819769.
10
Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care.系统评价:健康信息技术对医疗质量、效率和成本的影响
Ann Intern Med. 2006 May 16;144(10):742-52. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00125. Epub 2006 Apr 11.