• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗补助同伴支持服务的使用对成本的影响。

The impact of Medicaid peer support utilization on cost.

作者信息

Landers Glenn, Zhou Mei

机构信息

Georgia State University-Georgia Health Policy Center.

出版信息

Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2014 Feb 18;4(1). doi: 10.5600/mmrr.004.01.a04. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.5600/mmrr.004.01.a04
PMID:24926416
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4053190/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Peer support programs have proliferated over the past decade, building on recovery oriented programming, yet relationships between peer support services and the costs to public programs have not been well described in literature. The purpose of this study is to fill gaps in the literature related to peer support programs and cost: lack of comparison groups, small sample sizes, and the availability of research examining utilization of Medicaid mental health services.

METHODS

The study employed a retrospective design with treatment and comparison groups created from three administrative databases. Three ordinary least squares regression models were constructed to predict crisis stabilization cost, psychiatric hospitalization cost, and total Medicaid cost while controlling for other factors. The Chronic Illness and Disability Payment System + Rx was used to control for illness severity.

RESULTS

Peer support was associated with $5,991 higher total Medicaid cost (p < .01). Peer support was also associated with higher crisis stabilization cost and lower psychiatric hospitalization cost, but the relationships were not statistically significant. Peer support was associated with $2,100 higher prescription drug cost (p < .01), $5,116 higher professional services cost (p < .01), and $1,225 lower facility cost (p < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

While the implementation of Medicaid financed peer support programs may not result in savings from reductions of costly crisis stabilizations and psychiatric hospitalizations, it does support the principles of self-direction and recovery from severe mental illness. State policy makers must weigh the potential higher cost associated with peer support programs with efforts to redesign the delivery of mental health services.

摘要

背景

在过去十年中,同伴支持项目不断增加,基于以康复为导向的规划,但同伴支持服务与公共项目成本之间的关系在文献中尚未得到充分描述。本研究的目的是填补与同伴支持项目和成本相关的文献空白:缺乏对照组、样本量小以及缺乏对医疗补助心理健康服务利用情况的研究。

方法

该研究采用回顾性设计,从三个行政数据库中创建治疗组和对照组。构建了三个普通最小二乘回归模型,以预测危机稳定成本、精神科住院成本和医疗补助总成本,同时控制其他因素。使用慢性病和残疾支付系统+处方来控制疾病严重程度。

结果

同伴支持与医疗补助总成本高出5991美元相关(p <.01)。同伴支持还与较高的危机稳定成本和较低的精神科住院成本相关,但这些关系在统计学上并不显著。同伴支持与处方药成本高出2100美元相关(p <.01),专业服务成本高出5116美元相关(p <.01),设施成本低1225美元相关(p <.01)。

结论

虽然医疗补助资助的同伴支持项目的实施可能不会因减少昂贵的危机稳定和精神科住院而节省成本,但它确实支持自我导向和从严重精神疾病中康复的原则。州政策制定者必须权衡与同伴支持项目相关的潜在更高成本与重新设计心理健康服务提供方式的努力。

相似文献

1
The impact of Medicaid peer support utilization on cost.医疗补助同伴支持服务的使用对成本的影响。
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2014 Feb 18;4(1). doi: 10.5600/mmrr.004.01.a04. eCollection 2014.
2
The Effectiveness of a Peer-Staffed Crisis Respite Program as an Alternative to Hospitalization.同伴人员配备的危机暂息计划作为住院替代疗法的效果。
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Oct 1;69(10):1069-1074. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700451. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
3
An analysis of relationships among peer support, psychiatric hospitalization, and crisis stabilization.同伴支持、精神科住院治疗和危机稳定之间关系的分析。
Community Ment Health J. 2011 Feb;47(1):106-12. doi: 10.1007/s10597-009-9218-3. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
4
The cost-effectiveness of independent housing for the chronically mentally ill: do housing and neighborhood features matter?为慢性精神病患者提供独立住房的成本效益:住房和社区特征重要吗?
Health Serv Res. 2004 Oct;39(5):1341-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00293.x.
5
Initial Impacts of the Patient Care Networks of Alabama Initiative.阿拉巴马州患者护理网络倡议的初步影响
Health Serv Res. 2016 Feb;51(1):146-66. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12319. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
6
Effects of antipsychotic medication on psychiatric service utilization and cost.抗精神病药物对精神科服务利用及成本的影响。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2005 Jun;8(2):83-93.
7
Cost of treating seriously mentally ill persons with HIV following highly active retroviral therapy (HAART).高效抗逆转录病毒疗法(HAART)治疗合并严重精神疾病的HIV感染者的成本。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2009 Dec;12(4):187-94.
8
Cost shifting in a mental health carve-out for the AFDC population.为接受《对有受抚养子女家庭的援助》福利者设立的心理健康专项保险中的成本转嫁。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1997 Spring;18(3):95-108.
9
Capitation of public mental health services in Colorado: a five-year follow-up of system-level effects.科罗拉多州的公共精神卫生服务拨款:系统层面影响的五年随访。
Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Feb;62(2):179-85. doi: 10.1176/ps.62.2.pss6202_0179.
10
Medicaid managed care and the distribution of societal costs for persons with severe mental illness.医疗补助管理式医疗与严重精神疾病患者的社会成本分配
Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;165(2):254-60. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06122089. Epub 2008 Jan 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Partnering with Family Organizations in Research: Experiences from the Field.在研究中与家庭组织合作:来自实地的经验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jun 3;22(6):894. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22060894.
2
Peer support for discharge from hospital to community mental healthcare: a cost analysis.同伴支持对从医院出院至社区精神卫生保健的作用:一项成本分析。
Gen Psychiatr. 2025 Feb 4;38(1):e101671. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2024-101671. eCollection 2025.
3
Implementing the figure of peer support workers in mental health: an international perspective from the context of its implementation in Catalonia.在精神卫生领域实施同伴支持工作者:加泰罗尼亚实施情况的国际视角。
Salud Colect. 2023 Jan 23;19:e4252. doi: 10.18294/sc.2023.4252.
4
Characteristics of psychosocial interventions to improve ART adherence in people living with HIV: A systematic review.改善艾滋病毒感染者抗逆转录病毒治疗依从性的心理社会干预措施的特点:一项系统评价。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Oct 26;2(10):e0000956. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000956. eCollection 2022.
5
Mental Health Stigma Reduction in the Midwestern United States: Evidence from a Digital Campaign Using a Collective Impact Model.美国中西部地区减少心理健康污名化:基于采用集体影响模式的数字运动的证据。
J Community Health. 2022 Dec;47(6):924-931. doi: 10.1007/s10900-022-01130-3. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
6
Downstream hospital system effects of a comprehensive trauma recovery services program.一项综合创伤康复服务项目对下游医院系统的影响。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Dec;89(6):1177-1182. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002872.
7
Roles of peer specialists and use of mental health services among youth with serious mental illness.同伴专家的作用和严重精神疾病青年使用精神卫生服务的情况。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2021 Aug;15(4):914-921. doi: 10.1111/eip.13036. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
8
Relationship of peer specialists to mental health outcomes in South Florida.南佛罗里达州同伴专家与心理健康结果的关系。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2018 Oct 20;12:59. doi: 10.1186/s13033-018-0239-6. eCollection 2018.
9
Long-term acute care hospitals and Georgia Medicaid: Utilization, outcomes, and cost.长期急性病护理医院与佐治亚州医疗补助计划:使用情况、治疗结果及成本
SAGE Open Med. 2016 Sep 23;4:2050312116670928. doi: 10.1177/2050312116670928. eCollection 2016.
10
Medicaid Reimbursement of Mental Health Peer-Run Organizations: Results of a National Survey.医疗补助对同伴运营的心理健康组织的偿付:一项全国性调查的结果
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2017 Jul;44(4):501-511. doi: 10.1007/s10488-015-0675-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes In US spending on Mental Health And Substance Abuse Treatment, 1986-2005, and implications for policy.美国心理健康和物质滥用治疗支出的变化,1986-2005 年,及其对政策的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Feb;30(2):284-92. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0765.
2
Medicaid fee for service reimbursement and the delivery of human services for individuals with developmental disabilities or severe mental illness: negotiating cost.医疗补助服务收费报销与为发育障碍或严重精神疾病患者提供的公共服务:成本谈判。
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2010 Spring;32(4):380-404.
3
An analysis of relationships among peer support, psychiatric hospitalization, and crisis stabilization.同伴支持、精神科住院治疗和危机稳定之间关系的分析。
Community Ment Health J. 2011 Feb;47(1):106-12. doi: 10.1007/s10597-009-9218-3. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
4
Economic aspects of peer support groups for psychosis.精神病同伴支持小组的经济学方面。
Community Ment Health J. 2011 Feb;47(1):99-105. doi: 10.1007/s10597-009-9193-8. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
5
Adherence to antipsychotics among Latinos and Asians with schizophrenia and limited English proficiency.患有精神分裂症且英语水平有限的拉丁裔和亚裔人群对抗精神病药物的依从性。
Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Feb;60(2):175-82. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.60.2.175.
6
Impact of substance disorders on medical expenditures for medicaid beneficiaries with behavioral health disorders.物质使用障碍对患有行为健康障碍的医疗补助受益人的医疗支出的影响。
Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Jan;60(1):35-42. doi: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.1.35.
7
Case selection for a Medicaid chronic care management program.医疗补助慢性护理管理项目的病例选择
Health Care Financ Rev. 2008 Fall;30(1):61-74.
8
Survey research methods in evaluation and case-control studies.评估和病例对照研究中的调查研究方法。
Stat Med. 2007 Apr 15;26(8):1675-87. doi: 10.1002/sim.2796.
9
Peer support for persons with co-occurring disorders and community tenure: a survival analysis.对患有共病障碍和社区居住权者的同伴支持:一项生存分析。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2007 Winter;30(3):207-13. doi: 10.2975/30.3.2007.207.213.
10
Supported employment outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of ACT and clubhouse models.强化个案管理(ACT)与俱乐部模式随机对照试验的就业支持成果
Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Oct;57(10):1406-15. doi: 10.1176/ps.2006.57.10.1406.