• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于相对显著性的重要性:比较单一刺激与同时呈现的刺激的公开选择行为。

On the importance of relative salience: comparing overt selection behavior of single versus simultaneously presented stimuli.

作者信息

Siebold Alisha, Donk Mieke

机构信息

Department of Cognitive Psychology, Free University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Jun 13;9(6):e99707. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099707. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0099707
PMID:24927282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4057253/
Abstract

The goal of the current study was to investigate time-dependent effects of the number of targets presented and its interaction with stimulus salience on oculomotor selection performance. To this end, observers were asked to make a speeded eye movement to a target orientation singleton embedded in a homogeneous background of vertically oriented lines. In Experiment 1, either one or two physically identical targets were presented, whereas in Experiment 2 an additional orientation-based salience manipulation was performed. The results showed that the probability of a singleton being available for selection is reduced in the presence of an identical singleton (Experiment 1) and that this effect is modulated by the salience of the other singleton (Experiment 2). While the absolute orientation contrast of a target relative to the background contributed to the probability that it is available for selection, the crucial factor affecting selection was the relative salience between singletons. These findings are incompatible with a processing speed account, which highlights the importance of visibility and claims that a certain singleton identity has a unique speed with which it can be processed. In contrast, the finding that the number of targets presented affected a target's availability suggests an important role of the broader display context in determining oculomotor selection performance.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查呈现的目标数量的时间依赖性效应及其与刺激显著性的相互作用对眼动选择性能的影响。为此,要求观察者快速将眼球移向嵌入垂直定向线条的均匀背景中的目标方向单独元素。在实验1中,呈现一个或两个物理上相同的目标,而在实验2中,进行了额外的基于方向的显著性操纵。结果表明,在存在相同单独元素的情况下,单独元素可供选择的概率会降低(实验1),并且这种效应会受到另一个单独元素的显著性的调节(实验2)。虽然目标相对于背景的绝对方向对比度有助于其可供选择的概率,但影响选择的关键因素是单独元素之间的相对显著性。这些发现与一种处理速度观点不一致,该观点强调可见性的重要性,并声称某个单独元素身份具有其可被处理的独特速度。相比之下,呈现的目标数量影响目标可供性的发现表明,更广泛的显示背景在确定眼动选择性能方面起着重要作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f988/4057253/c03596ba3774/pone.0099707.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f988/4057253/5bc66567c410/pone.0099707.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f988/4057253/aea25aca3393/pone.0099707.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f988/4057253/d1254b115da0/pone.0099707.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f988/4057253/a96cd9a98392/pone.0099707.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f988/4057253/51b5290149b3/pone.0099707.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f988/4057253/b32ed0e196b6/pone.0099707.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f988/4057253/c03596ba3774/pone.0099707.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f988/4057253/5bc66567c410/pone.0099707.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f988/4057253/aea25aca3393/pone.0099707.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f988/4057253/d1254b115da0/pone.0099707.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f988/4057253/a96cd9a98392/pone.0099707.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f988/4057253/51b5290149b3/pone.0099707.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f988/4057253/b32ed0e196b6/pone.0099707.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f988/4057253/c03596ba3774/pone.0099707.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
On the importance of relative salience: comparing overt selection behavior of single versus simultaneously presented stimuli.关于相对显著性的重要性:比较单一刺激与同时呈现的刺激的公开选择行为。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 13;9(6):e99707. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099707. eCollection 2014.
2
In defense of the salience map: salience rather than visibility determines selection.为突显映射辩护:突显而非可见性决定选择。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Dec;39(6):1516-24. doi: 10.1037/a0032182. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
3
Reinstating salience effects over time: the influence of stimulus changes on visual selection behavior over a sequence of eye movements.随着时间恢复显著性效应:刺激变化对一系列眼动过程中视觉选择行为的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Aug;76(6):1655-70. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0493-2.
4
No control in orientation search: the effects of instruction on oculomotor selection in visual search.定向搜索中无控制:指令对视觉搜索中眼动选择的影响。
Vision Res. 2011 Oct 1;51(19):2156-66. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.08.013. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
5
The dynamics of saliency-driven and goal-driven visual selection as a function of eccentricity.作为眼跳距离函数的突显驱动和目标驱动视觉选择的动力学。
J Vis. 2021 Mar 1;21(3):2. doi: 10.1167/jov.21.3.2.
6
Salience drives overt selection of two equally relevant visual targets.显著性驱动对两个同等相关视觉目标的明显选择。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Aug;80(6):1342-1349. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1555-2.
7
Trading off stimulus salience for identity: A cueing approach to disentangle visual selection strategies.以身份权衡刺激显著性:一种用于解开视觉选择策略的线索提示方法。
Vision Res. 2015 Aug;113(Pt B):116-24. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
8
Finding the balance between capture and control: Oculomotor selection in early deaf adults.寻找捕捉与控制之间的平衡:早期失聪成年人的动眼神经选择
Brain Cogn. 2015 Jun;96:12-27. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Mar 29.
9
Visual salience affects performance in a working memory task.视觉显著性会影响工作记忆任务的表现。
J Neurosci. 2009 Jun 24;29(25):8016-21. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5503-08.2009.
10
Salient stimuli capture attention and action.突出的刺激会吸引注意力并引发行动。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Nov;75(8):1633-43. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0512-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Relative salience signaling within a thalamo-orbitofrontal circuit governs learning rate.丘脑-眶额皮层回路内的相对显著性信号控制学习率。
Curr Biol. 2021 Dec 6;31(23):5176-5191.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.09.037. Epub 2021 Oct 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Reinstating salience effects over time: the influence of stimulus changes on visual selection behavior over a sequence of eye movements.随着时间恢复显著性效应:刺激变化对一系列眼动过程中视觉选择行为的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Aug;76(6):1655-70. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0493-2.
2
Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search.引导搜索 2.0:一种改进的视觉搜索模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Jun;1(2):202-38. doi: 10.3758/BF03200774.
3
In defense of the salience map: salience rather than visibility determines selection.
为突显映射辩护:突显而非可见性决定选择。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Dec;39(6):1516-24. doi: 10.1037/a0032182. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
4
How the speed of motor-response decisions, but not focal-attentional selection, differs as a function of task set and target prevalence.运动反应决策的速度如何,而不是焦点注意选择,随任务集和目标出现率的不同而不同。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jul 10;109(28):E1990-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1206382109. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
5
Oculomotor evidence for top-down control following the initial saccade.眼动证据表明,在最初的扫视之后存在自上而下的控制。
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e23552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023552. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
6
No control in orientation search: the effects of instruction on oculomotor selection in visual search.定向搜索中无控制:指令对视觉搜索中眼动选择的影响。
Vision Res. 2011 Oct 1;51(19):2156-66. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.08.013. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
7
The time course of color- and luminance-based salience effects.基于颜色和亮度的显著效应的时程。
Front Psychol. 2010 Nov 17;1:189. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00189. eCollection 2010.
8
How longer saccade latencies lead to a competition for salience.更长的扫视潜伏期如何导致突显竞争。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Jul;22(7):916-23. doi: 10.1177/0956797611410572. Epub 2011 May 31.
9
Object salience is transiently represented whereas object presence is not: evidence from temporal order judgment.物体显著性是短暂表征的,而物体的存在则不是:来自时间顺序判断的证据。
Perception. 2011;40(1):63-73. doi: 10.1068/p6718.
10
Why salience is not enough: reflections on top-down selection in vision.为何显著性并不够:关于视觉中自上而下选择的思考
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Oct;135(2):130-2; discussion 133-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.05.012. Epub 2010 Jun 26.