Ley Brett, Elicker Brett M, Hartman Thomas E, Ryerson Christopher J, Vittinghoff Eric, Ryu Jay H, Lee Joyce S, Jones Kirk D, Richeldi Luca, King Talmadge E, Collard Harold R
From the Departments of Medicine (B.L., J.S.L., T.E.K., H.R.C.), Radiology (B.M.E.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (E.V.), and Pathology (K.D.J.), University of California-San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, Box 0111, San Francisco, CA 94143; Departments of Radiology (T.E.H.) and Medicine (J.H.R.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada (C.J.R.); and Department of Respiratory Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, England (L.R.).
Radiology. 2014 Nov;273(2):570-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14130216. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
To investigate the prognostic value of quantitative computed tomographic (CT) scoring for the extent of fibrosis or emphysema in the context of a clinical model that includes the gender, age, and physiology ( GAP gender, age, and physiology model) of the patient.
Study cohorts were approved by local institutional review boards, and all patients provided written consent. This was a retrospective cohort study that included 348 patients (246 men, 102 women; mean age, 69 years ± 9) with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis from two institutions. Fibrosis and emphysema visual scores were independently determined by two radiologists. Models were based on competing risks regression for death and were evaluated by using the C index and reclassification improvement.
The CT- GAP gender, age, and physiology model (a modification of the original GAP gender, age, and physiology model that replaces diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide with CT fibrosis score) had accuracy comparable to that of the original GAP gender, age, and physiology model, with a C index of 70.3 (95% confidence interval: 66.4, 74.0); difference in C index compared with the GAP gender, age, and physiology model of -0.4 (95% confidence interval: -2.2, 3.4). The performance of the original GAP gender, age, and physiology model did not change significantly with the simple addition of fibrosis score, with a change in C index of 0.0 (95% confidence interval: -1.8, 0.5) or of emphysema score, with a change in C index of 0.0 [95% confidence interval: -1.3, 0.4]).
CT fibrosis score can replace diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide test results in a modified GAP gender, age, and physiology model (the CT- GAP gender, age, and physiology model) with comparable performance. This may be a useful alternative model in situations where CT scoring is more reliable and available than diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide.
在包含患者性别、年龄和生理状况(GAP性别、年龄和生理模型)的临床模型背景下,研究定量计算机断层扫描(CT)评分对纤维化或肺气肿程度的预后价值。
研究队列经当地机构审查委员会批准,所有患者均提供书面同意书。这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了来自两家机构的348例特发性肺纤维化患者(246例男性,102例女性;平均年龄69岁±9岁)。纤维化和肺气肿的视觉评分由两名放射科医生独立确定。模型基于死亡的竞争风险回归,并使用C指数和重新分类改善进行评估。
CT-GAP性别、年龄和生理模型(对原始GAP性别、年龄和生理模型的修改,用CT纤维化评分替代一氧化碳弥散量)的准确性与原始GAP性别、年龄和生理模型相当,C指数为70.3(95%置信区间:66.4,74.0);与GAP性别、年龄和生理模型相比,C指数差异为-0.4(95%置信区间:-2.2,3.4)。单纯添加纤维化评分时,原始GAP性别、年龄和生理模型的性能无显著变化,C指数变化为0.0(95%置信区间:-1.8,0.5);添加肺气肿评分时,C指数变化为0.0[95%置信区间:-1.3,0.4])。
在性能相当的改良GAP性别、年龄和生理模型(CT-GAP性别、年龄和生理模型)中,CT纤维化评分可替代一氧化碳弥散量测试结果。在CT评分比一氧化碳弥散量更可靠且可用的情况下,这可能是一个有用的替代模型。