Joanny Fanny, Löhr Sascha J Z, Engleitner Thomas, Lell Bertrand, Mordmüller Benjamin
Institut für Tropenmedizin, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Wilhelmstraße 27, 72074 Tübingen, Germany.
Malar J. 2014 Jun 14;13:234. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-234.
Proper malaria diagnosis depends on the detection of asexual forms of Plasmodium spp. in the blood. Thick blood smear microscopy is the accepted gold standard of malaria diagnosis and is widely implemented. Surprisingly, diagnostic performance of this method is not well investigated and many clinicians in African routine settings base treatment decisions independent of microscopy results. This leads to overtreatment and poor management of other febrile diseases. Implementation of quality control programmes is recommended, but requires sustained funding, external logistic support and constant training and supervision of the staff. This study describes an easily applicable method to assess the performance of thick blood smear microscopy by determining the limit of blank and limit of detection. These two values are representative of the diagnostic quality and allow the correct discrimination between positive and negative samples.
Standard-conform methodology was applied and adapted to determine the limit of blank and the limit of detection of two thick blood smear microscopy methods (WHO and Lambaréné method) in a research centre in Lambaréné, Gabon. Duplicates of negative and low parasitaemia thick blood smears were read by several microscopists. The mean and standard deviation of the results were used to calculate the limit of blank and subsequently the limit of detection.
The limit of blank was 0 parasites/μL for both methods. The limit of detection was 62 and 88 parasites/μL for the Lambaréné and WHO method, respectively.
With a simple, back-of-the-envelope calculation, the performance of two malaria microscopy methods can be measured. These results are specific for each diagnostic unit and cannot be generalized but implementation of a system to control microscopy performance can improve confidence in parasitological results and thereby strengthen malaria control.
准确的疟疾诊断依赖于在血液中检测疟原虫属的无性体。厚血膜显微镜检查是公认的疟疾诊断金标准且被广泛应用。令人惊讶的是,该方法的诊断性能并未得到充分研究,在非洲的常规医疗环境中,许多临床医生在做出治疗决策时并不依赖显微镜检查结果。这导致了过度治疗以及对其他发热性疾病的管理不善。建议实施质量控制项目,但这需要持续的资金、外部后勤支持以及对工作人员的持续培训和监督。本研究描述了一种通过确定空白限和检测限来评估厚血膜显微镜检查性能的简单适用方法。这两个值代表了诊断质量,并能正确区分阳性和阴性样本。
采用符合标准的方法并进行调整,以确定加蓬兰巴雷内一个研究中心的两种厚血膜显微镜检查方法(世卫组织方法和兰巴雷内方法)的空白限和检测限。几名显微镜检查人员对阴性和低疟原虫血症厚血膜的复制品进行读数。结果的平均值和标准差用于计算空白限,进而计算检测限。
两种方法的空白限均为0个寄生虫/微升。兰巴雷内方法和世卫组织方法的检测限分别为62个和88个寄生虫/微升。
通过简单的大致计算,就可以测量两种疟疾显微镜检查方法的性能。这些结果针对每个诊断单位具有特异性,不能一概而论,但实施一个控制显微镜检查性能的系统可以提高对寄生虫学结果的信心,从而加强疟疾防控。