• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在流化床反应器中比较乳酸盐和甘油作为单电子供体用于硫酸盐还原的情况。

Comparing lactate and glycerol as a single-electron donor for sulfate reduction in fluidized bed reactors.

作者信息

Bertolino Sueli M, Melgaço Lucas A, Sá Renata G, Leão Versiane A

机构信息

Bio & Hydrometallurgy Laboratories, Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Campus Morro do Cruzeiro, s.n., Bauxita, Ouro Preto, MG, 35400-000, Brazil.

出版信息

Biodegradation. 2014 Sep;25(5):719-33. doi: 10.1007/s10532-014-9694-1. Epub 2014 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1007/s10532-014-9694-1
PMID:24929339
Abstract

Among the greatest challenges to the full implementation of biological sulfate reduction are the cost and availability of the electron source. With the development of the biofuel industry, new organic substrates have become available. Therefore, this work sought to compare the performance of a sulfidogenic process utilizing either lactate or glycerol as the substrate for sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) growth. Although sulfate reduction is energetically more favorable with lactate, glycerol is a less expensive alternative because excess production is forecasted with the worldwide development of the biodiesel industry. Continuous experiments were performed in a fluidized bed (FB) reactor containing activated carbon as a carrier for a mixed bacterial population composed of sulfate-reducing and fermentative bacteria. During the lactate-fed phases, incomplete oxidation of lactate to acetate by SRB was the dominant metabolic pathway resulting in as much as 90 % sulfate reduction and high acetate concentrations (2.7 g L(-1)). Conversely, in the glycerol-fed phases, glycerol degradation resulted from syntrophic cooperation between sulfate-reducing and fermentative bacteria that produce butyrate along with acetate (1.0 g L(-1)) as oxidation products. To our knowledge, this is the first report of butyrate formation during sulfate reduction in a glycerol-fed continuous-flow reactor. Sulfate concentrations were reduced by about 90 % (from 2,000 to 100-300 mg L(-1)) when glycerol was being fed to the reactor. Since the FB reactor was able to stand a change from lactate to glycerol, this reactor is recommended as the preferred option should glycerol be selected as a cost-effective alternative to lactate for continuous sulfate reduction.

摘要

全面实施生物硫酸盐还原面临的最大挑战之一是电子源的成本和可用性。随着生物燃料行业的发展,新的有机底物已经出现。因此,本研究旨在比较以乳酸或甘油为底物培养硫酸盐还原菌(SRB)的产硫化过程的性能。尽管以乳酸进行硫酸盐还原在能量上更有利,但甘油是一种成本较低的替代品,因为随着全球生物柴油行业的发展,预计会有过量的甘油产生。在一个流化床(FB)反应器中进行了连续实验,该反应器以活性炭为载体,用于培养由硫酸盐还原菌和发酵菌组成的混合菌群。在以乳酸为进料的阶段,SRB将乳酸不完全氧化为乙酸是主要的代谢途径,导致高达90%的硫酸盐还原和高浓度的乙酸(2.7 g L(-1))。相反,在以甘油为进料的阶段,甘油的降解是由硫酸盐还原菌和发酵菌之间的互营合作导致的,它们产生丁酸以及乙酸(1.0 g L(-1))作为氧化产物。据我们所知,这是关于在以甘油为进料的连续流反应器中进行硫酸盐还原过程中形成丁酸的首次报道。当向反应器中进料甘油时,硫酸盐浓度降低了约90%(从2000降至100 - 300 mg L(-1))。由于FB反应器能够承受从乳酸到甘油的转变,因此如果选择甘油作为比乳酸更具成本效益的连续硫酸盐还原替代物,推荐该反应器作为首选选项。

相似文献

1
Comparing lactate and glycerol as a single-electron donor for sulfate reduction in fluidized bed reactors.在流化床反应器中比较乳酸盐和甘油作为单电子供体用于硫酸盐还原的情况。
Biodegradation. 2014 Sep;25(5):719-33. doi: 10.1007/s10532-014-9694-1. Epub 2014 Jun 15.
2
Study of anaerobic lactate metabolism under biosulfidogenic conditions.生物产硫化物条件下厌氧乳酸代谢的研究
Water Res. 2009 Aug;43(14):3345-54. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.11.044. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
3
Simple organic electron donors support diverse sulfate-reducing communities in fluidized-bed reactors treating acidic metal- and sulfate-containing wastewater.简单有机电子供体可支持流化床反应器中多种硫酸盐还原菌群,用于处理含酸性金属和硫酸盐的废水。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2004 Mar 1;47(3):279-89. doi: 10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00284-8.
4
Contributions of fermentative acidogenic bacteria and sulfate-reducing bacteria to lactate degradation and sulfate reduction.发酵产酸细菌和硫酸盐还原细菌对乳酸降解和硫酸盐还原的作用。
Chemosphere. 2008 May;72(2):233-42. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.01.046. Epub 2008 Mar 10.
5
Bacterial glycerol oxidation coupled to sulfate reduction at neutral and acidic pH.在中性和酸性pH条件下,细菌甘油氧化与硫酸盐还原相耦合。
J Gen Appl Microbiol. 2018 Mar 27;64(1):1-8. doi: 10.2323/jgam.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
6
Implications of volatile fatty acid profile on the metabolic pathway during continuous sulfate reduction.挥发性脂肪酸谱对连续硫酸盐还原过程中代谢途径的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2012 Jul 30;103:15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.02.022. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
7
Neural network prediction of thermophilic (65 degrees C) sulfidogenic fluidized-bed reactor performance for the treatment of metal-containing wastewater.用于处理含金属废水的嗜热(65摄氏度)产硫化物流化床反应器性能的神经网络预测
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007 Jul 1;97(4):780-7. doi: 10.1002/bit.21282.
8
Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.上流式厌氧污泥床反应器——综述
Indian J Environ Health. 2001 Apr;43(2):1-82.
9
Performance of a down-flow fluidized bed reactor under sulfate reduction conditions using volatile fatty acids as electron donors.使用挥发性脂肪酸作为电子供体的下流式流化床反应器在硫酸盐还原条件下的性能。
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007 Jul 1;97(4):771-9. doi: 10.1002/bit.21288.
10
Microbial sulfate reduction in a liquid-solid fluidized bed reactor.液固流化床反应器中的微生物硫酸盐还原作用
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2000 Nov 20;70(4):370-80.

引用本文的文献

1
Insights of energy potential in thermophilic sugarcane vinasse and molasses treatment: does two-stage codigestion enhance operational performance?嗜热甘蔗废醪和糖蜜处理中的能源潜力洞察:两段式共消化是否能提高运行性能?
Biodegradation. 2024 Oct 29;36(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s10532-024-10097-y.
2
On the formation of superoxide radicals on colloidal ATiO (A = Sr and Ba) nanocrystal surfaces.关于在胶体ATiO(A = Sr和Ba)纳米晶体表面上超氧自由基的形成。
Nanoscale Adv. 2020 Apr 16;2(5):1949-1955. doi: 10.1039/d0na00106f. eCollection 2020 May 19.
3
Using a high-organic matter biowall to treat a trichloroethylene plume at the Beaver Dam Road landfill.
利用高有机质生物墙处理比弗坝路垃圾填埋场的三氯乙烯羽流。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Mar;25(9):8735-8746. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-1137-1. Epub 2018 Jan 11.