• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜腹侧网片直肠固定术的熟练程度获得曲线和结果预测因素。

Proficiency gain curve and predictors of outcome for laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy.

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, UK.

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Frenchay Hospital, Bristol & University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Surgery. 2014 Jul;156(1):158-67. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.03.008. Epub 2014 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2014.03.008
PMID:24929765
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) is a well-recognized treatment for rectal prolapse and high-grade rectal intussusception. However, it is technically complex with the possibility of clinically relevant morbidity. The objectives were to define (i) the efficacy and safety of LVMR, (ii) risk factors for poor clinical outcome, and (iii) the autodidactic proficiency gain curve.

METHODS

All primary LVMR cases performed by the senior author between January 1997 and February 2013 were included in the study. In addition to the clinical outcomes, quality-of-life outcomes, including the Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score and obstructive defecation syndrome score, were evaluated. Risk factors for operative complications, recurrence, and mesh-related complications were identified by the use of logistic regression models. Proficiency gain curves for functional and clinical outcomes were assessed using cumulative sum curves.

RESULTS

A total of 636 LVMRs were performed during the study period. The mean percentage improvement in the Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score and obstructive defecation syndrome score were 89.7% (SD 21.8%) and 56.7% (SD 20.6%). The operative complication, recurrent symptoms, and mesh-related complication rates were 9.9%, 9.4%, and 3.1%, respectively. Predictors of operative complication were male sex and previous abdominal operation; the only predictor of mesh-related complications and recurrence was the use of polyester mesh. The learning curve for operative time was 54 cases, but for other clinical and quality-of-life outcomes was between 82 and 105 cases.

CONCLUSION

LVMR treats rectal prolapse effectively, providing good symptomatic relief with minimal morbidity. However, the self-taught learning curve for this complex laparoscopic procedure is protracted.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜下腹膜前直肠固定术(LVMR)是治疗直肠脱垂和高位直肠套叠的一种公认方法。然而,该手术技术复杂,存在临床相关发病率的可能。目的是定义(i)LVMR 的疗效和安全性,(ii)不良临床结局的风险因素,以及(iii)自学能力提高曲线。

方法

纳入 1997 年 1 月至 2013 年 2 月期间由资深作者进行的所有原发性 LVMR 病例。除临床结果外,还评估了生活质量结果,包括克利夫兰诊所失禁评分和梗阻性排便障碍综合征评分。使用逻辑回归模型确定手术并发症、复发和网片相关并发症的风险因素。使用累积和曲线评估功能和临床结局的熟练度提高曲线。

结果

研究期间共进行了 636 例 LVMR。克利夫兰诊所失禁评分和梗阻性排便障碍综合征评分的平均改善百分比分别为 89.7%(SD 21.8%)和 56.7%(SD 20.6%)。手术并发症、症状复发和网片相关并发症的发生率分别为 9.9%、9.4%和 3.1%。手术并发症的预测因素为男性和既往腹部手术;网片相关并发症和复发的唯一预测因素是使用聚酯网。手术时间的学习曲线为 54 例,但其他临床和生活质量结局的学习曲线在 82 至 105 例之间。

结论

LVMR 有效治疗直肠脱垂,提供良好的症状缓解,且发病率低。然而,这种复杂的腹腔镜手术的自学能力提高曲线较为漫长。

相似文献

1
Proficiency gain curve and predictors of outcome for laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy.腹腔镜腹侧网片直肠固定术的熟练程度获得曲线和结果预测因素。
Surgery. 2014 Jul;156(1):158-67. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.03.008. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
2
Outcome of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for external rectal prolapse.腹腔镜下腹膜网片直肠固定术治疗直肠外脱垂的疗效
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Nov;16(11):914-9. doi: 10.1111/codi.12741.
3
Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in male patients with internal or external rectal prolapse.腹腔镜下腹膜网片直肠固定术治疗男性直肠内脱垂或外脱垂患者
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Dec;16(12):995-1000. doi: 10.1111/codi.12763.
4
Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy vs Delorme's operation in management of complete rectal prolapse: a prospective randomized study.腹腔镜下腹膜网片直肠固定术与德洛姆手术治疗完全性直肠脱垂的前瞻性随机研究
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Jan;19(1):50-57. doi: 10.1111/codi.13399.
5
Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy using biologic mesh for the treatment of obstructed defaecation syndrome and/or faecal incontinence in patients with internal rectal prolapse: a critical appraisal of the first 100 cases.使用生物补片的腹腔镜下腹直肌固定术治疗直肠内脱垂患者的排便梗阻综合征和/或大便失禁:对前100例病例的批判性评估
Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Apr;19(4):209-19. doi: 10.1007/s10151-014-1255-4. Epub 2015 Jan 11.
6
Does Ventral Rectopexy Improve Pelvic Floor Function in the Long Term?腹直肠固定术能长期改善盆底功能吗?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Feb;61(2):230-238. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000974.
7
Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy, posterior colporrhaphy and vaginal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of recto-genital prolapse and mechanical outlet obstruction.腹腔镜下腹直肌固定术、后盆腔修补术及阴道骶骨固定术治疗直肠生殖器脱垂和机械性出口梗阻。
Colorectal Dis. 2008 Feb;10(2):138-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01259.x. Epub 2007 May 10.
8
Robot-Assisted Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A 5-Year Experience at a Tertiary Referral Center.机器人辅助腹侧网状直肠固定术治疗直肠脱垂:在一家三级转诊中心的5年经验
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Nov;60(11):1215-1223. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000895.
9
Is robotic-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy superior to laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in the management of obstructed defaecation?机器人辅助腹侧网片直肠固定术在治疗梗阻性排便困难方面优于腹腔镜腹侧网片直肠固定术吗?
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Aug;15(8):e469-75. doi: 10.1111/codi.12251.
10
How to deal with complications after laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy: lessons learnt from a tertiary referral centre.如何处理腹腔镜腹侧网片直肠固定术后的并发症:来自三级转诊中心的经验教训。
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jun;15(6):707-12. doi: 10.1111/codi.12164.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: the PEXITY study.腹腔镜腹侧直肠固定术治疗全层直肠脱垂的长期疗效:PEXITY研究
Tech Coloproctol. 2025 Feb 14;29(1):68. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-03104-0.
2
The Learning Curve in Urogynecology and Functional Urology: A Systematic Review.女性盆底重建外科与功能性泌尿外科的学习曲线:一项系统评价
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Jan 16. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-06016-7.
3
Could robotic-assisted surgery reduce mesh-related complications after ventral mesh rectopexy? Experience of a tertiary centre and systematic review of the literature.
机器人辅助手术能否减少腹侧网片直肠固定术后的网片相关并发症?三级中心的经验和文献系统评价。
Colorectal Dis. 2024 Apr;26(4):609-621. doi: 10.1111/codi.16938. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
4
Current diagnostic tools and treatment modalities for rectal prolapse.直肠脱垂的当前诊断工具和治疗方式。
World J Clin Cases. 2023 Jun 6;11(16):3680-3693. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i16.3680.
5
Skill-qualified surgeons positively affect short-term outcomes after laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a survey of the National Clinical Database of Japan.技能熟练的外科医生对腹腔镜胃癌根治术的短期疗效有积极影响:来自日本国家临床数据库的调查。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4627-4640. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09950-7. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
6
A comparative study on the surgical options for male rectal prolapse.男性直肠脱垂手术方式的比较研究
J Minim Access Surg. 2022 Jul-Sep;18(3):426-430. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_214_21.
7
Approaching Combined Rectal and Vaginal Prolapse.直肠阴道联合脱垂的处理
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2022 Jan 17;34(5):302-310. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1726351. eCollection 2021 Sep.
8
Predictive Factors for Recurrence of External Rectal Prolapse after Laparoscopic Ventral Rectopexy.腹腔镜腹侧直肠固定术后直肠外脱垂复发的预测因素
J Anus Rectum Colon. 2021 Oct 28;5(4):376-385. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2021-024. eCollection 2021.
9
Update on Robotic Rectal Prolapse Treatment.机器人辅助直肠脱垂治疗的最新进展
J Pers Med. 2021 Jul 23;11(8):706. doi: 10.3390/jpm11080706.
10
Proctorship in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery.微创结直肠手术中的监考
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2021 May;34(3):186-193. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1722765. Epub 2021 Mar 29.