• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探究消极思维的认知负荷:一项新颖的双任务实验。

Exploring the cognitive load of negative thinking: a novel dual-task experiment.

作者信息

Takano Keisuke, Iijima Yudai, Sakamoto Shinji, Tanno Yoshihiko

机构信息

College of Humanities and Sciences, Nihon University, 3-25-40, Sakurajosui Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 156-0045, Japan.

The University of Tokyo, 3-8-1, Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan.

出版信息

J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;45(4):435-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 Jun 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.05.003
PMID:24929783
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Females are more likely to engage in the preoccupation of past negative experiences than males, which might contribute to their greater tendency toward depression. However, there is limited understanding regarding the cognitive basis for the negative autobiographical information processing of females. In the present study, we assessed the cognitive resources required for negative thinking, by using a novel dual-task paradigm that combined think-aloud and time-estimation tasks.

METHODS

Fifty-three Japanese undergraduate students were asked to think aloud about personal past or future emotional episodes for a particular duration. In addition, they were asked to estimate the duration of their speech. Their estimates were compared to the actual time taken, and the errors were used as indices of cognitive burden during the speech task.

RESULTS

As compared to males, females exhibited greater judgment errors, particularly when thinking about their past negative experiences. This suggests that females allocate more attentional resources toward thinking about the past.

LIMITATIONS

Participants could rehearse the task during the time reproduction phase, and the quality of the rehearsal and their memory capacity might have influenced the accuracy of their duration judgment.

CONCLUSIONS

Females tend to allocate more attentional resources than males to thinking about past negative episodes, which in turn might be associated with reduced availability of resources for central cognitive control processes such as inhibition of and switching away from processing of negative autobiographical information.

摘要

背景与目的

女性比男性更倾向于纠结过去的负面经历,这可能导致她们更易患抑郁症。然而,对于女性负面自传信息处理的认知基础,我们了解有限。在本研究中,我们通过使用一种结合出声思考和时间估计任务的新型双重任务范式,评估了负面思维所需的认知资源。

方法

53名日本本科生被要求在特定时长内出声思考个人过去或未来的情感事件。此外,他们还被要求估计自己讲话的时长。将他们的估计与实际用时进行比较,误差用作言语任务中认知负担的指标。

结果

与男性相比,女性表现出更大的判断误差,尤其是在思考过去的负面经历时。这表明女性在思考过去时会分配更多注意力资源。

局限性

参与者可能在时间再现阶段排练任务,排练质量和他们的记忆能力可能影响了他们时长判断的准确性。

结论

女性比男性倾向于分配更多注意力资源来思考过去的负面事件,这反过来可能与诸如抑制和转移对负面自传信息处理等中央认知控制过程的资源可用性降低有关。

相似文献

1
Exploring the cognitive load of negative thinking: a novel dual-task experiment.探究消极思维的认知负荷:一项新颖的双任务实验。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;45(4):435-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
2
Deep thinking increases task-set shielding and reduces shifting flexibility in dual-task performance.深度思考会增加任务集屏蔽,降低双重任务表现中的转换灵活性。
Cognition. 2012 May;123(2):303-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.11.015. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
3
Shared cognitive processes underlying past and future thinking: the impact of imagery and concurrent task demands on event specificity.过去和未来思维的共同认知过程:意象和并发任务需求对事件特异性的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Mar;38(2):356-65. doi: 10.1037/a0025451. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
4
Difficulties in disengaging attentional resources from self-generated thoughts moderate the link between dysphoria and maladaptive self-referential thinking.从自我产生的想法中转移注意力资源的困难程度,调节了抑郁和适应不良的自我参照思维之间的联系。
Cogn Emot. 2012;26(4):748-57. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.613917. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
5
How cognitive load affects duration judgments: A meta-analytic review.认知负荷如何影响时长判断:一项元分析综述。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Jul;134(3):330-43. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.03.006. Epub 2010 Apr 18.
6
The impact of cognitive restructuring and mindfulness strategies on postevent processing and affect in social anxiety disorder.认知重构和正念策略对社交焦虑障碍后事件处理和影响的影响。
J Anxiety Disord. 2014 Aug;28(6):570-9. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.05.012. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
7
It's all in the detail: intentional forgetting of autobiographical memories using the autobiographical think/no-think task.细节决定一切:使用自传体思维/无思维任务有意遗忘自传体记忆。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Mar;39(2):375-93. doi: 10.1037/a0028888. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
8
Remembering the past and imagining the future: differences in event specificity of spontaneously generated thought.回忆过去与想象未来:自发产生的思维在事件特异性上的差异。
Memory. 2009 May;17(4):367-73. doi: 10.1080/09658210902751669. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
9
Thinking aloud influences perceived time.边想边说会影响对时间的感知。
Hum Factors. 2015 Feb;57(1):101-9. doi: 10.1177/0018720814540208.
10
Rumination relates to reduced autobiographical memory specificity in formerly depressed patients following a self-discrepancy challenge: the case of autobiographical memory specificity reactivity.反刍与曾患有抑郁症患者在自我差异挑战后的自传体记忆特异性降低有关:自传体记忆特异性反应的案例。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;43(4):1002-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The burden of brooding on neural error processing: The role of repetitive negative thinking in major depressive disorder with and without comorbid anxiety disorders.沉思神经错误处理的负担:重复消极思维在伴发或不伴发焦虑障碍的重性抑郁障碍中的作用。
J Affect Disord. 2025 Jan 15;369:27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.09.151. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
2
Young people's future thinking and mental health: The development and validation of the Adolescent Future Thinking Rating Scale.青少年的未来思维与心理健康:青少年未来思维评定量表的编制与验证
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2023 Oct 3;33(1):e1994. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1994.
3
Orbito-frontal cortex mechanism of inhibition of return in current and remitted depression.
眶额皮层在当前和缓解期抑郁中抑制返回的机制。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Jul;39(7):2941-2954. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24051. Epub 2018 Mar 25.