Additional benefit of endoscopic ultrasound with bronchoscope-guided fine needle aspiration to endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in the evaluation of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and endoscopic ultrasound with bronchoscope-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-B-FNA) are minimally invasive procedures for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. This study aimed to investigate the additional diagnostic value of EUS-B-FNA following EBUS-TBNA.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature review of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register databases and extracted the studies reporting the implementation of the combined EBUS-TBNA/EUS-B-FNA. A proportional meta-analysis was conducted to determine the pooled diagnostic yield of this procedure.

RESULTS

We identified nine studies involving 2,375 patients. The overall pooled diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA alone and combined EBUS-TBNA/EUS-B-FNA was 0.87 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79-0.95, I=96.55%] and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.85-0.99, I=97.89%), respectively. Adding EUS-B-FNA to EBUS-TBNA increased the diagnostic yield by approximately 0.05. There was statistical heterogeneity among the studies (I=54.49%). Among the 832 patients in seven studies, additional diagnostic benefits of EUS-B-FNA were observed in 37 lesions. The most common diagnosed lesion was in station 4L (n=10), followed by station 5 (n=8) and station 7 (n=8).

CONCLUSIONS

In pooled estimates, the addition of EUS-B-FNA to EBUS-TBNA increased the diagnostic yield for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. Nodal station 4L, station 5, and station 8 were lesions frequently diagnosed by the addition of EUS-B-FNA. Because of statistical between-study heterogeneity, our findings should be interpreted with caution.