Moghadam Fatemeh Velayati, Majidinia Sara, Chasteen Joseph, Ghavamnasiri Marjaneh
Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Department of Oral Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Eur J Dent. 2013 Oct;7(4):405-411. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.120655.
The purpose of the present randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the color change, rebound effect and sensitivity of at-home bleaching with 15% carbamide peroxide and power bleaching using 38% hydrogen peroxide.
For bleaching techniques, 20 subjects were randomized in a split mouth design (at-home and power bleaching): In maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (n = 20). Color was recorded before bleaching, immediately after bleaching, at 2 weeks, 1, 3 and 6 month intervals. Tooth sensitivity was recorded using the visual analog scale. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare both groups regarding bleaching effectiveness (ΔE1), rebound effect (ΔE2) and color difference between the rebounded tooth color and unbleached teeth (ΔE3) while the Wilcoxon compared ΔE within each group. Distribution of sensitivity was evaluated using the Chi-square test (α =0.05).
There was no significant difference between groups regarding ΔE1 and ΔE3 (P > 0.05). Even though, ΔE2 showed no significant difference between groups after bleaching as well as at 2 week, 1 month and 3 month follow-up periods (P > 0.05). Although, significant difference was found in ΔE2 (P < 0.05 Mann-Whitney) between two methods after 6 months and a high degree of rebound effect was obtained with power bleaching. Within each group, there was no significant difference between ΔE1 and ΔE3 (P < 0.05 Wilcoxon). The distribution of sensitivity was identical with both techniques (P > 0.05).
Bleaching techniques resulted in identical tooth whitening and post-operative sensitivity using both techniques, but faster color regression was found with power bleaching even though color regression to the baseline of the teeth in both groups was the same after 6 months.
本随机临床试验的目的是评估使用15%过氧化脲进行家庭漂白以及使用38%过氧化氢进行强力漂白后的颜色变化、反弹效应和敏感性。
对于漂白技术,20名受试者采用半口设计(家庭漂白和强力漂白)随机分组:在上颌和下颌前牙(n = 20)。在漂白前、漂白后即刻、2周、1、3和6个月间隔时记录颜色。使用视觉模拟量表记录牙齿敏感性。采用Mann-Whitney检验比较两组在漂白效果(ΔE1)、反弹效应(ΔE2)以及反弹牙齿颜色与未漂白牙齿之间的颜色差异(ΔE3),而Wilcoxon检验比较每组内的ΔE。使用卡方检验评估敏感性分布(α = 0.05)。
两组在ΔE1和ΔE3方面无显著差异(P > 0.05)。尽管如此,ΔE2在漂白后以及2周、1个月和3个月随访期两组之间也无显著差异(P > 0.05)。然而,6个月后两种方法在ΔE2方面存在显著差异(Mann-Whitney检验,P < 0.05),并且强力漂白获得了高度的反弹效应。在每组内,ΔE1和ΔE3之间无显著差异(Wilcoxon检验,P < 0.05)。两种技术的敏感性分布相同(P > 0.05)。
两种漂白技术导致相同的牙齿美白效果和术后敏感性,但强力漂白发现颜色回归更快,尽管两组牙齿在6个月后颜色均回归到基线水平。