• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术的学习曲线及长期疗效

Learning curve and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

作者信息

Hu Wei-guo, Ma Jun-Jun, Zang Lu, Xue Pei, Xu Hua, Wang Ming-Liang, Lu Ai-Guo, Li Jian-Wen, Feng Bo, Zheng Min-Hua

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine , Shanghai, China; Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center , Shanghai, China .

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Jul;24(7):487-92. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0570. Epub 2014 Jun 16.

DOI:10.1089/lap.2013.0570
PMID:24933012
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the learning curve of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) with lymph node dissection and the oncological results and long-term outcomes of different periods in the learning stage.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred twenty-four patients with gastric cancer who received LADG with lymph node dissection from January 2004 to December 2009 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. They were divided into three groups (A-C) according to different operative date: 41 were in Group A (early), 41 in Group B (middle), and 42 in Group C (laer). There were no significant statistical differences among the three groups with respect to age, gender, early/advanced gastric cancer, Union for International Cancer Control stage, and lymph node dissection. Then the following items were compared in these groups: operative time, blood loss, number of lymph nodes harvested, postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay, and long-term survival.

RESULTS

The operative time in Group A (235.0±50.3 minutes) was significantly longer than in Groups B (201.7±39.6 minutes) and C (199.0±44.7 minutes), but there was no significant difference between Groups B and C. The harvest of lymph nodes from Group A (11.0±5.5) was significantly less than from Groups B (16.3±9.2) and C (17.2±8.7), but there was no significant difference between Groups B and C. The postoperative hospital stay and complications, overall survival, and disease-free survival showed no difference among the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The learning curve of gastrointestinal surgeons with experience of laparoscopic operation is about 40 cases. The oncological principles and long-term outcomes were not sacrificed during the learning stage.

摘要

目的

探讨腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术(LADG)联合淋巴结清扫的学习曲线,以及学习阶段不同时期的肿瘤学结果和长期预后。

患者与方法

回顾性分析2004年1月至2009年12月期间接受LADG联合淋巴结清扫的124例胃癌患者。根据手术日期将他们分为三组(A - C):A组(早期)41例,B组(中期)41例,C组(后期)42例。三组在年龄、性别、早期/进展期胃癌、国际癌症控制联盟分期和淋巴结清扫方面无显著统计学差异。然后比较这些组的以下项目:手术时间、失血量、清扫淋巴结数量、术后并发症、术后住院时间和长期生存率。

结果

A组的手术时间(235.0±50.3分钟)显著长于B组(201.7±39.6分钟)和C组(199.0±44.7分钟),但B组和C组之间无显著差异。A组清扫的淋巴结数量(11.0±5.5)显著少于B组(16.3±9.2)和C组(17.2±8.7),但B组和C组之间无显著差异。三组的术后住院时间、并发症、总生存率和无病生存率无差异。

结论

有腹腔镜手术经验的胃肠外科医生的学习曲线约为40例。在学习阶段未牺牲肿瘤学原则和长期预后。

相似文献

1
Learning curve and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术的学习曲线及长期疗效
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Jul;24(7):487-92. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0570. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
2
Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted by conventional open distal gastrectomy and extraperigastric lymph node dissection in early gastric cancer.早期胃癌腹腔镜辅助下与传统开放远端胃切除术及胃周外淋巴结清扫术的比较
J Surg Oncol. 2005 Jul 1;91(1):90-4. doi: 10.1002/jso.20271.
3
Learning curve for laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with regional lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer.早期胃癌腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术联合区域淋巴结清扫的学习曲线
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008 Jun;18(3):236-41. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31816aa13f.
4
Laparoscopic-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node resection for advanced gastric cancer: effect of learning curve on short-term outcomes. a meta-analysis.腹腔镜辅助与开放远端胃癌根治术联合D2淋巴结清扫治疗进展期胃癌:学习曲线对短期结局的影响。一项荟萃分析。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Mar;24(3):139-50. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0481.
5
[Efficacy comparison of laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph dissection for advanced gastric cancer].[腹腔镜与开放远端胃癌根治术联合D2淋巴结清扫治疗进展期胃癌的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 May;19(5):530-4.
6
Impact of Abdominal Shape on Short-Term Surgical Outcome of Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.腹部形态对腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术短期手术疗效的影响
J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Jun;20(6):1091-7. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3125-z. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
7
Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: technical and oncologic aspects.腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术联合D2淋巴结清扫术:技术与肿瘤学方面
Surg Endosc. 2008 Mar;22(3):655-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9431-5.
8
Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with D1+beta compared with D1+alpha lymph node dissection.腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术采用D1 +β与D1 +α淋巴结清扫术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2008 Apr;22(4):955-60. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9529-9. Epub 2007 Aug 19.
9
Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer during a surgeon's learning curve period.腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术学习曲线期间的短期疗效。
Surg Endosc. 2009 Oct;23(10):2250-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0315-0. Epub 2009 Jan 27.
10
Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for middle-third advanced gastric cancer.腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术与腹腔镜辅助全胃切除术联合 D2 淋巴结清扫术治疗胃中三分之一进展期胃癌。
Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2255-2262. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5919-9. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Survival Outcomes Between Minimally Invasive and Open Gastrectomy in Early and Locally Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma in a Western Center.西方某中心早期及局部进展期胃腺癌患者行微创与开放胃切除术的生存结局
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 Feb 20;56(1):68. doi: 10.1007/s12029-024-01163-y.
2
Establishing the Learning Curve of Laparoscopic and Robotic Distal Gastrectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis.腹腔镜和机器人远端胃切除术学习曲线的确立:系统评价和荟萃回归分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Dec;27(12):2946-2982. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05812-8. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
3
The Learning Curve for Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy in Gastric Cancer Patients.
胃癌患者手辅助腹腔镜全胃切除术的学习曲线
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 19;11(22):6841. doi: 10.3390/jcm11226841.
4
Short-term postoperative outcomes of gastric adenocarcinoma patients treated with curative intent in low-volume centers.低容量中心行根治性治疗的胃腺癌患者的短期术后结局。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Oct 17;20(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02804-x.
5
Outcomes of laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开腹胃癌 D2 淋巴结清扫术治疗胃癌的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Med Res. 2022 Jul 18;27(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s40001-022-00748-2.
6
Study on the application of preoperative three-dimensional CT angiography of perigastric arteries in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy.胃周动脉术前三维 CT 血管造影在腹腔镜胃癌根治术中的应用研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 11;12(1):6026. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09584-0.
7
Long-term oncological outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy for grossly early gastric cancer-mimicking advanced gastric cancer: Propensity score matching analysis.腹腔镜胃切除术治疗酷似进展期胃癌的大体早期胃癌的长期肿瘤学结局:倾向评分匹配分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 4;99(49):e23441. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023441.
8
Laparoscopic versus open approach in gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗进展期胃癌的疗效比较:系统评价。
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jun 13;18(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-01888-7.
9
Non-robotic minimally invasive gastrectomy as an independent risk factor for postoperative intra-abdominal infectious complications: A single-center, retrospective and propensity score-matched analysis.非机器人微创胃切除术是术后腹腔内感染并发症的独立危险因素:一项单中心回顾性倾向评分匹配分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Mar 21;26(11):1172-1184. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i11.1172.
10
Learning curve and short-term outcomes of modularized LADG for advanced gastric cancer: A retrospective study.模块化腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的学习曲线及短期疗效:一项回顾性研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Mar;98(10):e14670. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014670.