Suppr超能文献

挑战3D-QSAR的金标准:模板比较分子场分析(CoMFA)与X射线对齐。

Challenging the gold standard for 3D-QSAR: template CoMFA versus X-ray alignment.

作者信息

Wendt Bernd, Cramer Richard D

机构信息

Certara, Martin-Kollar-Str. 17, 81829, Munich, Germany,

出版信息

J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2014 Aug;28(8):803-24. doi: 10.1007/s10822-014-9761-z. Epub 2014 Jun 17.

Abstract

X-ray-based alignments of bioactive compounds are commonly used to correlate structural changes with changes in potencies, ultimately leading to three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships such as CoMFA or CoMSIA models that can provide further guidance for the design of new compounds. We have analyzed data sets where the alignment of the compounds is entirely based on experimentally derived ligand poses from X-ray-crystallography. We developed CoMFA and CoMSIA models from these X-ray-determined receptor-bound conformations and compared the results with models generated from ligand-centric Template CoMFA, finding that the fluctuations in the positions and conformations of compounds dominate X-ray-based alignments can yield poorer predictions than those from the self-consistent template CoMFA alignments. Also, when there exist multiple different binding modes, structural interpretation in terms of binding site constraints can often be simpler with template-based alignments than with X-ray-based alignments.

摘要

基于X射线的生物活性化合物比对通常用于将结构变化与活性变化相关联,最终得出三维定量构效关系,如CoMFA或CoMSIA模型,这些模型可为新化合物的设计提供进一步指导。我们分析了化合物比对完全基于X射线晶体学实验得出的配体构象的数据集。我们从这些由X射线确定的受体结合构象中开发了CoMFA和CoMSIA模型,并将结果与以配体为中心的模板CoMFA生成的模型进行比较,发现化合物位置和构象的波动主导基于X射线的比对,其预测效果可能比自洽模板CoMFA比对的预测效果更差。此外,当存在多种不同的结合模式时,基于模板的比对在根据结合位点限制进行结构解释方面通常比基于X射线的比对更简单。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验