Rapacciuolo Giovanni, Maher Sean P, Schneider Adam C, Hammond Talisin T, Jabis Meredith D, Walsh Rachel E, Iknayan Kelly J, Walden Genevieve K, Oldfather Meagan F, Ackerly David D, Beissinger Steven R
Berkeley Initiative in Global Change Biology, University of California Berkeley, 3101 Valley Life Sciences Building, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA; Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California Berkeley, 130 Mulford Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA; Department of Integrative Biology, University of California Berkeley, 1005 Valley Life Sciences Building, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Sep;20(9):2841-55. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12638. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
Understanding recent biogeographic responses to climate change is fundamental for improving our predictions of likely future responses and guiding conservation planning at both local and global scales. Studies of observed biogeographic responses to 20th century climate change have principally examined effects related to ubiquitous increases in temperature - collectively termed a warming fingerprint. Although the importance of changes in other aspects of climate - particularly precipitation and water availability - is widely acknowledged from a theoretical standpoint and supported by paleontological evidence, we lack a practical understanding of how these changes interact with temperature to drive biogeographic responses. Further complicating matters, differences in life history and ecological attributes may lead species to respond differently to the same changes in climate. Here, we examine whether recent biogeographic patterns across California are consistent with a warming fingerprint. We describe how various components of climate have changed regionally in California during the 20th century and review empirical evidence of biogeographic responses to these changes, particularly elevational range shifts. Many responses to climate change do not appear to be consistent with a warming fingerprint, with downslope shifts in elevation being as common as upslope shifts across a number of taxa and many demographic and community responses being inconsistent with upslope shifts. We identify a number of potential direct and indirect mechanisms for these responses, including the influence of aspects of climate change other than temperature (e.g., the shifting seasonal balance of energy and water availability), differences in each taxon's sensitivity to climate change, trophic interactions, and land-use change. Finally, we highlight the need to move beyond a warming fingerprint in studies of biogeographic responses by considering a more multifaceted view of climate, emphasizing local-scale effects, and including a priori knowledge of relevant natural history for the taxa and regions under study.
了解近期生物地理对气候变化的响应对于改进我们对未来可能响应的预测以及指导地方和全球尺度的保护规划至关重要。对20世纪气候变化观察到的生物地理响应的研究主要考察了与普遍升温相关的影响——统称为变暖指纹。尽管从理论角度广泛承认气候其他方面变化的重要性——特别是降水和水资源可利用性——并得到古生物学证据的支持,但我们对这些变化如何与温度相互作用以驱动生物地理响应缺乏实际的理解。更复杂的是,生活史和生态属性的差异可能导致物种对相同的气候变化做出不同的响应。在这里,我们研究加利福尼亚州近期的生物地理模式是否与变暖指纹一致。我们描述了20世纪加利福尼亚州气候的各个组成部分在区域上是如何变化的,并回顾了生物地理对这些变化响应的实证证据,特别是海拔范围的变化。许多对气候变化的响应似乎与变暖指纹不一致,在许多分类群中,海拔向下坡移动与向上坡移动一样常见,而且许多人口统计学和群落响应与向上坡移动不一致。我们确定了这些响应的一些潜在直接和间接机制,包括温度以外的气候变化方面的影响(例如,能量和水资源可利用性的季节性平衡变化)、每个分类群对气候变化的敏感性差异、营养相互作用和土地利用变化。最后,我们强调在生物地理响应研究中需要超越变暖指纹,通过考虑更全面的气候观点、强调局部尺度效应以及纳入所研究分类群和区域的相关自然史的先验知识。