Suppr超能文献

使用可变压力的可调电阻脉冲传感进行纳米颗粒ζ电位测量。

Nanoparticle ζ-potential measurements using tunable resistive pulse sensing with variable pressure.

作者信息

Eldridge James A, Willmott Geoff R, Anderson Will, Vogel Robert

机构信息

Callaghan Innovation, 69 Gracefield Road, PO Box 31310, Lower Hutt 5040, New Zealand; The MacDiarmid Institute for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology, School of Chemical and Physical Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6140, New Zealand; School of Chemical and Physical Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6140, New Zealand.

Callaghan Innovation, 69 Gracefield Road, PO Box 31310, Lower Hutt 5040, New Zealand; The MacDiarmid Institute for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology, School of Chemical and Physical Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6140, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Colloid Interface Sci. 2014 Sep 1;429:45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.05.013. Epub 2014 May 20.

Abstract

Modern resistive pulse sensing techniques can be used to measure nanoparticle electrophoretic mobility, and hence ζ-potential. In contrast to conventional light scattering methods, resistive pulse sensing produces particle-by-particle data. We have used tunable resistive pulse sensing (TRPS) to compare methods for measuring the ζ-potential of carboxylated polystyrene nanoparticles. The five particle sets studied had nominal surface charge density (σ) between 0 and -0.67 C m(-2), and diameters in the range 160-230 nm. Data were collected with pressure in the range ±500 Pa applied across a tunable pore. In each experiment, pressure was varied either continuously or in discrete steps. Calculations of the ζ-potential were obtained by analysing both the rate and the full-width half maximum duration of resistive pulses. Data obtained from duration analyses were more reproducible than rate methods, yielding typical variations smaller than ±5 mV. When σ was greater (less negative) than -0.32 C m(-2), all of the analysis methods studied yielded a monotonic relationship between ζ-potential and σ. Complicated pulse data were observed near the pressure at which the net particle flux is zero, and these observations have been explored by examining competition between electrokinetic and pressure-driven transport. The typical difference between ζ-potentials obtained using TRPS and phase analysis light scattering was 15% (<5 mV), with an experimental error of ∼10% attributable to both techniques.

摘要

现代电阻脉冲传感技术可用于测量纳米颗粒的电泳迁移率,进而测量ζ电位。与传统的光散射方法不同,电阻脉冲传感可逐个颗粒地生成数据。我们使用可调电阻脉冲传感(TRPS)来比较测量羧基化聚苯乙烯纳米颗粒ζ电位的方法。所研究的五组颗粒的标称表面电荷密度(σ)在0至 -0.67 C m⁻²之间,直径范围为160 - 230 nm。在可调孔径上施加±500 Pa范围内的压力来收集数据。在每个实验中,压力要么连续变化,要么以离散步骤变化。通过分析电阻脉冲的速率和半高宽持续时间来计算ζ电位。从持续时间分析获得的数据比速率方法更具可重复性,典型变化小于±5 mV。当σ大于(负值更小)-0.32 C m⁻²时,所研究的所有分析方法在ζ电位和σ之间都呈现出单调关系。在净颗粒通量为零的压力附近观察到复杂的脉冲数据,并且通过研究电动传输和压力驱动传输之间的竞争对这些观察结果进行了探讨。使用TRPS和相位分析光散射获得的ζ电位之间的典型差异为15%(<5 mV),两种技术的实验误差约为10%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验