Shi Dan, Xu Jian-Xia, Wu Hua-Xiang, Wang Ying, Zhou Qi-Jing, Yu Ri-Sheng
Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jiefang Road 88#, Hangzhou, 310009, China.
Clin Rheumatol. 2015 Apr;34(4):755-65. doi: 10.1007/s10067-014-2725-9. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
This study aims to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of the tophus urate volume, erosion volume, and the erosion score measurements in patients with gout by using dual-energy CT (DECT) scans comparing their bone erosion volumes against bone erosion scores and also to determine a valid measure of joint destruction in chronic gout. Sixty-six subjects underwent DECT scans of the hands or feet. Two independent observers measured the tophus urate volumes and bone erosion volumes using automated volume assessment software and the erosion scores based on the rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging score (RAMRIS). The intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility were analyzed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and limits of agreements analysis. The relationship between erosion volumes and erosion scores was analyzed. The intraobserver and interobserver ICC for tophus urate volume measurements (n = 636) were 1.000 (95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) 1.000 to 1.000) and 1.000 (95 % CI 1.000 to 1.000), 0.999 (0.999, 0.999) and 0.999 (0.999, 0.999) for bone erosion volumes (n = 350), 0.937 (0.928, 0.946) and 0.899 (0.883, 0.912) for erosion scores (n = 350). Strong positive correlations were demonstrated between individual erosion volumes and scores (r s = 0.914, p < 0.001) as well as total erosion volume and score per patient (r = 0.838-0.867, p < 0.001). This study demonstrated a high reproducibility of tophus urate volumes, erosion volumes, and erosion score measurements using DECT. Erosion volumes show to be a more direct and accurate method to evaluate bone erosion compared with erosion score, strongly supporting it as a superior and standard measure of structural joint damage in gout.
本研究旨在通过双能CT(DECT)扫描评估痛风患者痛风石尿酸盐体积、侵蚀体积和侵蚀评分测量的观察者内和观察者间的可重复性,将其骨侵蚀体积与骨侵蚀评分进行比较,并确定慢性痛风关节破坏的有效测量方法。66名受试者接受了手部或足部的DECT扫描。两名独立观察者使用自动体积评估软件测量痛风石尿酸盐体积和骨侵蚀体积,并根据类风湿关节炎磁共振成像评分(RAMRIS)对侵蚀评分进行测量。通过组内相关系数(ICC)和一致性界限分析来分析观察者内和观察者间的可重复性。分析侵蚀体积与侵蚀评分之间的关系。痛风石尿酸盐体积测量(n = 636)的观察者内和观察者间ICC分别为1.000(95%置信区间(95%CI)1.000至1.000)和1.000(95%CI 1.000至1.000),骨侵蚀体积(n = 350)的ICC分别为0.999(0.999,0.999)和0.999(0.999,0.999),侵蚀评分(n = 350)的ICC分别为0.937(0.928,0.946)和0.899(0.883,0.912)。个体侵蚀体积与评分之间(rs = 0.914,p < 0.001)以及每位患者的总侵蚀体积与评分之间(r = 0.838 - 0.867,p < 0.001)均显示出强正相关。本研究表明,使用DECT测量痛风石尿酸盐体积、侵蚀体积和侵蚀评分具有高可重复性。与侵蚀评分相比,侵蚀体积显示出是评估骨侵蚀的更直接和准确的方法,有力地支持其作为痛风中关节结构损伤的一种优越且标准的测量方法。