Zamer William E, Scheiner Samuel M
Biological Sciences Directorate, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, USA
Biological Sciences Directorate, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, USA.
Integr Comp Biol. 2014 Nov;54(5):736-56. doi: 10.1093/icb/icu075. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
Implicit or subconscious theory is especially common in the biological sciences. Yet, theory plays a variety of roles in scientific inquiry. First and foremost, it determines what does and does not count as a valid or interesting question or line of inquiry. Second, theory determines the background assumptions within which inquiries are pursued. Third, theory provides linkages among disciplines. For these reasons, it is important and useful to develop explicit theories for biology. A general theory of organisms is developed, which includes 10 fundamental principles that apply to all organisms, and 6 that apply to multicellular organisms only. The value of a general theory comes from its utility to help guide the development of more specific theories and models. That process is demonstrated by examining two domains: ecoimmunology and development. For the former, a constitutive theory of ecoimmunology is presented, and used to develop a specific model that explains energetic trade-offs that may result from an immunological response of a host to a pathogen. For the latter, some of the issues involved in trying to devise a constitutive theory that covers all of development are explored, and a more narrow theory of phenotypic novelty is presented. By its very nature, little of a theory of organisms will be new. Rather, the theory presented here is a formal expression of nearly two centuries of conceptual advances and practice in research. Any theory is dynamic and subject to debate and change. Such debate will occur as part of the present, initial formulation, as the ideas presented here are refined. The very process of debating the form of the theory acts to clarify thinking. The overarching goal is to stimulate debate about the role of theory in the study of organisms, and thereby advance our understanding of them.
隐性或潜意识理论在生物科学中尤为常见。然而,理论在科学探究中发挥着多种作用。首先也是最重要的,它决定了什么算作有效的或有趣的问题或探究方向,什么不算。其次,理论决定了进行探究时所依据的背景假设。第三,理论在各学科之间建立联系。基于这些原因,为生物学发展明确的理论是重要且有用的。我们构建了一个关于生物体的通用理论,其中包括适用于所有生物体的10条基本原理,以及仅适用于多细胞生物体的6条原理。通用理论的价值在于它有助于指导更具体理论和模型的发展。通过考察两个领域来展示这个过程:生态免疫学和发育学。对于前者,提出了一种生态免疫学的构成性理论,并用于构建一个具体模型,该模型解释了宿主对病原体的免疫反应可能导致的能量权衡。对于后者,探讨了试图设计一个涵盖所有发育过程的构成性理论所涉及的一些问题,并提出了一个更狭义的表型新奇性理论。就其本质而言,生物体理论几乎没有什么新内容。相反,这里提出的理论是近两个世纪研究中概念进步和实践的一种形式化表达。任何理论都是动态的,会受到争论和变化的影响。在当前这个初步表述阶段,随着这里提出的观点得到完善,这样的争论将会出现。对理论形式进行争论的过程本身就有助于澄清思路。总体目标是激发关于理论在生物体研究中作用的争论,从而增进我们对生物体的理解。