• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哮喘质量改进计划在维持认证中的有效性。

Effectiveness of an asthma quality improvement program designed for maintenance of certification.

机构信息

Pediatric Physicians' Organization at Children's, Brookline, Massachusetts;Division of General Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; andDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

Pediatric Physicians' Organization at Children's, Brookline, Massachusetts;

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2014 Jul;134(1):e242-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-2643. Epub 2014 Jun 16.

DOI:10.1542/peds.2013-2643
PMID:24935994
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Pediatricians are required to perform quality improvement for board recertification. We developed an asthma project within the Pediatric Physicians' Organization at Children's, an independent practice association affiliated with Boston Children's Hospital, designed to meet recertification requirements and improve asthma care.

METHODS

The program was based on the learning collaborative model. We developed practice-based registries of children 5 to 17 years of age with persistent asthma and helped physicians improve processes of asthma care through education, data feedback, and sharing of best practices.

RESULTS

Fifty-six physicians participated in 3 cohorts; 594 patients were included in the project. In all cohorts, improvements occurred in the use of asthma action plans (62.4%-76.8% cohort 1, 50.6%-88.4% cohort 2, 53.0%-79.6% cohort 3) and Asthma Control Tests (4.6%-55.2% cohort 1, 9.0%-67.8% cohort 2, 15.2%-61.4% cohort 3). Less consistent improvements were observed in seasonal influenza vaccines, controller medications, and asthma follow-up visits. The proportion of patients experiencing ≥1 asthma exacerbation within the year declined in all 3 cohorts (37.8%-19.9%, P = .0002 cohort 1; 27.8%-20.7%, P = .1 cohort 2; 36.6%-26.9%, P = .1 cohort 3). For each cohort, asthma exacerbations declined to a greater extent than those of a comparison group.

CONCLUSIONS

This asthma quality improvement project designed for maintenance of certification improved processes of care among patients with persistent asthma. The learning collaborative approach may be a useful model for other board-recertification quality improvement projects but requires a substantial investment of organizational time and staff.

摘要

目的

儿科医生需要进行质量改进以获得委员会再认证。我们在儿童医疗机构的儿科医生组织内开发了一个哮喘项目,这是一家与波士顿儿童医院相关的独立实践协会,旨在满足再认证要求并改善哮喘护理。

方法

该计划基于学习合作模式。我们为 5 至 17 岁持续性哮喘儿童建立了基于实践的登记处,并通过教育、数据反馈和最佳实践共享帮助医生改善哮喘护理流程。

结果

56 名医生参加了 3 个队列;594 名患者参与了该项目。在所有队列中,哮喘行动计划的使用均有所改善(第 1 队列为 62.4%-76.8%,第 2 队列为 50.6%-88.4%,第 3 队列为 53.0%-79.6%),哮喘控制测试的使用也有所改善(第 1 队列为 4.6%-55.2%,第 2 队列为 9.0%-67.8%,第 3 队列为 15.2%-61.4%)。季节性流感疫苗、控制器药物和哮喘随访的使用情况改善不那么一致。在所有 3 个队列中,一年内经历≥1 次哮喘加重的患者比例均有所下降(第 1 队列为 37.8%-19.9%,P=0.0002;第 2 队列为 27.8%-20.7%,P=0.1;第 3 队列为 36.6%-26.9%,P=0.1)。对于每个队列,哮喘加重的程度都比对照组更严重。

结论

这项针对维持认证的哮喘质量改进项目改善了持续性哮喘患者的护理流程。学习合作方法可能是其他委员会再认证质量改进项目的有用模式,但需要组织投入大量的时间和员工。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of an asthma quality improvement program designed for maintenance of certification.哮喘质量改进计划在维持认证中的有效性。
Pediatrics. 2014 Jul;134(1):e242-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-2643. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
2
Exemplar pediatric collaborative improvement networks: achieving results.典范儿科合作改进网络:取得成果。
Pediatrics. 2013 Jun;131 Suppl 4:S196-203. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3786F.
3
Application of quality-improvement methods in a community practice: the Sandhills Pediatrics Asthma Initiative.质量改进方法在社区实践中的应用:沙丘儿科哮喘倡议
N C Med J. 2005 May-Jun;66(3):218-20.
4
A multisite randomized trial of the effects of physician education and organizational change in chronic-asthma care: health outcomes of the Pediatric Asthma Care Patient Outcomes Research Team II Study.一项关于医生教育和组织变革对慢性哮喘护理影响的多中心随机试验:儿科哮喘护理患者结局研究团队II研究的健康结局
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004 Sep;158(9):875-83. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.158.9.875.
5
Pediatric collaborative improvement networks: background and overview.儿科合作改进网络:背景与概述。
Pediatrics. 2013 Jun;131 Suppl 4:S189-95. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3786E.
6
Correlation of care process measures with childhood asthma exacerbations.护理过程措施与儿童哮喘恶化的相关性。
Pediatrics. 2013 Jan;131(1):e136-43. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1144. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
7
Pediatric collaborative networks for quality improvement and research.用于质量改进和研究的儿科协作网络。
Acad Pediatr. 2013 Nov-Dec;13(6 Suppl):S69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.07.004.
8
Urban primary care physicians' perceptions about initiation of controller medications during a pediatric emergency department visit for asthma.城市基层医疗医生对儿童哮喘急诊就诊期间启动控制药物治疗的看法。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Jan;28(1):8-11. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31823ed4c4.
9
Impact of a quality improvement program on care and outcomes for children with asthma.质量改进项目对哮喘儿童护理及治疗结果的影响。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005 May;159(5):464-9. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.159.5.464.
10
Physician professionalism and accountability: the role of collaborative improvement networks.医师的专业性和责任感:合作改进网络的作用。
Pediatrics. 2013 Jun;131 Suppl 4:S204-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3786G.

引用本文的文献

1
Deploying an asthma dashboard to support quality improvement across a nationally representative sentinel network of 7.6 million people in England.在英格兰一个具有全国代表性的 760 万人群哨点网络中部署哮喘监测仪表板,以支持质量改进。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2024 Jun 29;34(1):18. doi: 10.1038/s41533-024-00377-8.
2
Interventions on health care providers to improve seasonal influenza vaccination rates among patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence since 2000.干预医疗保健提供者以提高患者季节性流感疫苗接种率:2000 年以来证据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Fam Pract. 2021 Jul 28;38(4):524-536. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaa149.
3
Statewide Asthma Learning Collaborative Participation and Asthma-Related Emergency Department Use.
全州哮喘学习协作参与与哮喘相关急诊就诊。
Pediatrics. 2020 Dec;146(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-0213.
4
Use of Asthma APGAR Tools in Primary Care Practices: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.在初级保健实践中使用哮喘 APGAR 工具:一项集群随机对照试验。
Ann Fam Med. 2018 Mar;16(2):100-110. doi: 10.1370/afm.2179.
5
IOEASMA: an integrated clinical and educational pathway for managing asthma in children and adolescents.IOEASMA:一种综合的临床和教育途径,用于管理儿童和青少年哮喘。
Ital J Pediatr. 2017 Jun 24;43(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13052-017-0374-8.
6
Improving Pediatric Asthma Care and Outcomes Across Multiple Hospitals.改善多家医院的儿科哮喘护理及治疗效果
Pediatrics. 2015 Dec;136(6):e1602-10. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0285. Epub 2015 Nov 2.